Suppr超能文献

不同引出方法下连贯言语结果的差异。

Differences in Connected Speech Outcomes Across Elicitation Methods.

作者信息

Schnur Tatiana T, Wang Sharon

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Aphasiology. 2024;38(5):816-837. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2023.2239509. Epub 2023 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Connected speech is often used to assess many aspects of an individual's language abilities after stroke. However, it is unknown the degree to which elicitation methods differ in generating structural and syntactic aspects of connected speech, two critical components of successful communication. Quantifying the degree to which elicitation methods differ in eliciting structurally, syntactically, and lexically complex connected speech at the earliest stage of stroke before reorganization and rehabilitation of function independent of clinical diagnosis of aphasia has not been examined to date. Addressing this gap has implications for early clinical intervention as well as empirical studies of connected speech production.

AIMS

We compared two common elicitation methods, picture description and storytelling on lexical, structural, and syntactic measures of connected speech in speakers during the acute stage of left hemisphere stroke.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: We measured connected speech using an automated quantitative production analysis approach (Fromm et al., 2021) in 71 native-English speaking participants (27 female; 59 ± 13 years) within an average 3.9 days from left hemisphere stroke onset. We tested the degree of agreement and consistency between elicitation methods for lexical, structural, and syntactic measures of connected speech, as well as the degree of concordance in classifying deficits across individuals.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Storytelling elicited significantly more words and more structurally complex, lexically diverse, and syntactically accurate speech in comparison to picture description. Elicitation methods differed in measuring outcomes across participants for the lexical and syntactic, but not structural complexity aspects of connected speech where storytelling classified more participants with impairments in comparison to picture description.

CONCLUSIONS

These differences suggest storytelling provides assessment of connected speech abilities more reflective of real-world abilities where its use is particularly critical for examining individual differences and providing diagnoses of acute stroke language deficits. As a result, using storytelling as a connected speech elicitation method more effectively captures a patient's language capabilities after stroke, consequently informing clinical diagnosis and treatment.

摘要

背景

连贯言语常用于评估中风后个体语言能力的多个方面。然而,目前尚不清楚不同的诱发方法在生成连贯言语的结构和句法方面存在多大差异,而这两个方面是成功沟通的关键组成部分。在功能重组和康复之前,即独立于失语症临床诊断的中风早期阶段,量化不同诱发方法在引出结构、句法和词汇复杂的连贯言语方面的差异程度,迄今为止尚未得到研究。填补这一空白对早期临床干预以及连贯言语产生的实证研究具有重要意义。

目的

我们比较了两种常见的诱发方法,即图片描述和讲故事,以评估左半球中风急性期患者连贯言语的词汇、结构和句法指标。

方法与过程

我们采用自动定量产出分析方法(弗洛姆等人,2021年),对71名以英语为母语的参与者(27名女性;平均年龄59±13岁)在左半球中风发作后平均3.9天内的连贯言语进行了测量。我们测试了连贯言语的词汇、结构和句法指标在不同诱发方法之间的一致性和连贯性程度,以及个体间缺陷分类的一致性程度。

结果与结论

与图片描述相比,讲故事能引出更多的单词,以及结构更复杂、词汇更丰富和句法更准确的言语。在连贯言语的词汇和句法复杂性方面,不同诱发方法在测量参与者的结果时存在差异,但在结构复杂性方面没有差异,与图片描述相比,讲故事能将更多有损伤的参与者分类出来。

结论

这些差异表明,讲故事能更真实地反映现实世界中的能力,在评估连贯言语能力方面更具优势,其对于检查个体差异和诊断急性中风语言缺陷尤为关键。因此,将讲故事作为连贯言语诱发方法能更有效地捕捉中风后患者的语言能力,从而为临床诊断和治疗提供依据。

相似文献

1
Differences in Connected Speech Outcomes Across Elicitation Methods.
Aphasiology. 2024;38(5):816-837. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2023.2239509. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
2
Description of connected speech across different elicitation tasks in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Sep;56(5):1074-1085. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12660. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
5
Anterior connectivity critical for recovery of connected speech after stroke.
Brain Commun. 2022 Oct 19;4(6):fcac266. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac266. eCollection 2022.
7
Connected Speech Characteristics of Bengali Speakers With Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence for Language-Specific Diagnostic Markers.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Sep 7;13:707628. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.707628. eCollection 2021.
8
Effects of context and word class on lexical retrieval in Chinese speakers with anomic aphasia.
Aphasiology. 2015 Jan;29(1):81-100. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.951598.
9
Improved vocabulary production after naming therapy in aphasia: can gains in picture naming generalize to connected speech?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009 Nov-Dec;44(6):1036-62. doi: 10.1080/13682820802585975.
10
Are single-word picture naming assessments a valid measure of word retrieval in connected speech?
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Feb;24(1):97-109. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2021.1966098. Epub 2021 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Analyzing Language in the Picnic Scene Picture and in Conversation: The Type of Discourse Sample We Choose Influences Findings in People With Aphasia.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Jul 10;32(4):1413-1430. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00279. Epub 2023 May 31.
2
Contributions of semantic and phonological working memory to narrative language independent of single word production: Evidence from acute stroke.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2022 Jul-Dec;39(5-8):296-324. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2023.2186782. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
3
Anterior connectivity critical for recovery of connected speech after stroke.
Brain Commun. 2022 Oct 19;4(6):fcac266. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac266. eCollection 2022.
4
Assessing naming errors using an automated machine learning approach.
Neuropsychology. 2022 Nov;36(8):709-718. doi: 10.1037/neu0000860. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
5
An efficient, accurate and clinically-applicable index of content word fluency in Aphasia.
Aphasiology. 2022 Aug 3;36(8):921-939. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2021.1923946. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
7
Incidence of Aphasia in Ischemic Stroke.
Neuroepidemiology. 2022;56(3):174-182. doi: 10.1159/000524206. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
9
Description of connected speech across different elicitation tasks in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Sep;56(5):1074-1085. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12660. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
10
Agrammatism and Paragrammatism: A Cortical Double Dissociation Revealed by Lesion-Symptom Mapping.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020;1(2):208-225. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00010. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验