Schnur Tatiana T, Wang Sharon
Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Aphasiology. 2024;38(5):816-837. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2023.2239509. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
Connected speech is often used to assess many aspects of an individual's language abilities after stroke. However, it is unknown the degree to which elicitation methods differ in generating structural and syntactic aspects of connected speech, two critical components of successful communication. Quantifying the degree to which elicitation methods differ in eliciting structurally, syntactically, and lexically complex connected speech at the earliest stage of stroke before reorganization and rehabilitation of function independent of clinical diagnosis of aphasia has not been examined to date. Addressing this gap has implications for early clinical intervention as well as empirical studies of connected speech production.
We compared two common elicitation methods, picture description and storytelling on lexical, structural, and syntactic measures of connected speech in speakers during the acute stage of left hemisphere stroke.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: We measured connected speech using an automated quantitative production analysis approach (Fromm et al., 2021) in 71 native-English speaking participants (27 female; 59 ± 13 years) within an average 3.9 days from left hemisphere stroke onset. We tested the degree of agreement and consistency between elicitation methods for lexical, structural, and syntactic measures of connected speech, as well as the degree of concordance in classifying deficits across individuals.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Storytelling elicited significantly more words and more structurally complex, lexically diverse, and syntactically accurate speech in comparison to picture description. Elicitation methods differed in measuring outcomes across participants for the lexical and syntactic, but not structural complexity aspects of connected speech where storytelling classified more participants with impairments in comparison to picture description.
These differences suggest storytelling provides assessment of connected speech abilities more reflective of real-world abilities where its use is particularly critical for examining individual differences and providing diagnoses of acute stroke language deficits. As a result, using storytelling as a connected speech elicitation method more effectively captures a patient's language capabilities after stroke, consequently informing clinical diagnosis and treatment.
连贯言语常用于评估中风后个体语言能力的多个方面。然而,目前尚不清楚不同的诱发方法在生成连贯言语的结构和句法方面存在多大差异,而这两个方面是成功沟通的关键组成部分。在功能重组和康复之前,即独立于失语症临床诊断的中风早期阶段,量化不同诱发方法在引出结构、句法和词汇复杂的连贯言语方面的差异程度,迄今为止尚未得到研究。填补这一空白对早期临床干预以及连贯言语产生的实证研究具有重要意义。
我们比较了两种常见的诱发方法,即图片描述和讲故事,以评估左半球中风急性期患者连贯言语的词汇、结构和句法指标。
我们采用自动定量产出分析方法(弗洛姆等人,2021年),对71名以英语为母语的参与者(27名女性;平均年龄59±13岁)在左半球中风发作后平均3.9天内的连贯言语进行了测量。我们测试了连贯言语的词汇、结构和句法指标在不同诱发方法之间的一致性和连贯性程度,以及个体间缺陷分类的一致性程度。
与图片描述相比,讲故事能引出更多的单词,以及结构更复杂、词汇更丰富和句法更准确的言语。在连贯言语的词汇和句法复杂性方面,不同诱发方法在测量参与者的结果时存在差异,但在结构复杂性方面没有差异,与图片描述相比,讲故事能将更多有损伤的参与者分类出来。
这些差异表明,讲故事能更真实地反映现实世界中的能力,在评估连贯言语能力方面更具优势,其对于检查个体差异和诊断急性中风语言缺陷尤为关键。因此,将讲故事作为连贯言语诱发方法能更有效地捕捉中风后患者的语言能力,从而为临床诊断和治疗提供依据。