Independent Researcher, Formerly with the Food Research Laboratory, Centre for Food Safety, Hong Kong.
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2021 Jun;38(6):997-1012. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2021.1898679. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
Cereals and feed contaminated with ergot alkaloids (EAs) have been of concern for several decades. Nowadays, analysis of EAs is focused on ergometrine, ergotamine, ergosine, ergocristine, ergocryptine (a mixture of α- and β-isomers) and ergocornine and their related -inine epimers as listed in the European Commission Recommendation 2012/154/EU. Liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection has been used for quantification of EAs for decades whilst LC-MS has become the work-horse for quantification of EAs in the last decade. However, in LC-MS analysis matrix effects of different magnitudes exist for each EA epimer, especially ergometrine/ergometrinine, even after different clean-up procedures. This leads to an underestimation or overestimation of EAs levels. Moreover, isotopic labelled standards for EAs are still not available in the market. This review aims to provide background information on different analytical methods, discuss their advantages and disadvantages and possible advancement. Moreover, the method performance requirements to support forthcoming regulations are also discussed.
几十年来,受到污染的谷物和饲料中的麦角生物碱(EAs)一直是人们关注的焦点。如今,EAs 的分析主要集中在麦角新碱、麦角胺、麦角酸、麦角柯宁碱、麦角隐亭(α-和β-异构体的混合物)和麦角柯宁碱以及欧盟委员会 2012/154/EU 号建议中列出的相关-inine 表异构体上。几十年来,荧光检测液相色谱法一直用于 EAs 的定量分析,而在过去十年中,LC-MS 已成为 EAs 定量分析的主力。然而,对于每种 EA 表异构体,即使经过不同的净化程序,LC-MS 分析中仍存在不同程度的基质效应,特别是麦角新碱/麦角新碱,这导致 EAs 水平的低估或高估。此外,市场上仍然没有 EAs 的同位素标记标准品。本文旨在提供不同分析方法的背景信息,讨论它们的优缺点和可能的进展。此外,还讨论了支持即将出台的法规的方法性能要求。