• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优惠贸易协定对双边贸易的影响:结构引力模型分析。

The impact of preferential trade agreements on bilateral trade: A structural gravity model analysis.

机构信息

School of International Business, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.

School of Economics and Management, Panzhihua University, Panzhihua, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 30;16(3):e0249118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249118. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0249118
PMID:33784357
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8009400/
Abstract

Trade agreements are thought to raise trade integration, but existing preferential trade agreements (PTAs) are insufficient in measuring market access of products. This study develops a product-based coverage index of PTAs using the World Trade Organization (WTO) preferential trade agreements and calculates bilateral trade measures using the EORA multi-regional input-output (MRIO) tables covering 189 countries worldwide over the period 1990-2015; the structural gravity model is employed to test how PTAs affect bilateral trade. Our findings show that countries sharing a common PTA could boost the trade volume compared to those without PTAs, supporting the trade creation effect. However, the trade promotion effect of the product-based coverage index of PTAs is significant only if the member countries are low-and middle-income countries. Further, the wide range of product liberalization brought by PTAs can promote global production networks by stimulating the trade of intermediate goods. Our results are important for understanding the market access effect of PTAs with the increasing development of trade integration and global value chains (GVCs).

摘要

贸易协定被认为可以提高贸易一体化水平,但现有的优惠贸易协定(PTA)在衡量产品的市场准入方面还不够充分。本研究使用世界贸易组织(WTO)的优惠贸易协定开发了一个基于产品的 PTA 覆盖指数,并利用 EORA 多区域投入产出(MRIO)表计算了 1990 年至 2015 年期间涵盖全球 189 个国家的双边贸易措施;采用结构引力模型检验了 PTA 如何影响双边贸易。我们的研究结果表明,与没有 PTA 的国家相比,拥有共同 PTA 的国家可以增加贸易量,支持贸易创造效应。然而,只有在成员国为中低收入国家的情况下,基于产品的 PTA 覆盖指数的贸易促进效应才显著。此外,PTA 带来的广泛产品自由化可以通过刺激中间品贸易来促进全球生产网络。随着贸易一体化和全球价值链(GVC)的不断发展,我们的研究结果对于理解 PTA 的市场准入效应具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb39/8009400/106d9ffcc593/pone.0249118.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb39/8009400/3339c9ce9ae6/pone.0249118.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb39/8009400/350656192cd2/pone.0249118.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb39/8009400/78770faff457/pone.0249118.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb39/8009400/106d9ffcc593/pone.0249118.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb39/8009400/3339c9ce9ae6/pone.0249118.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb39/8009400/350656192cd2/pone.0249118.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb39/8009400/78770faff457/pone.0249118.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb39/8009400/106d9ffcc593/pone.0249118.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of preferential trade agreements on bilateral trade: A structural gravity model analysis.优惠贸易协定对双边贸易的影响:结构引力模型分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 30;16(3):e0249118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249118. eCollection 2021.
2
Trade liberalization and tuberculosis incidence: a longitudinal multi-level analysis in 22 high burden countries between 1990 and 2010.贸易自由化与结核病发病率:1990年至2010年间22个高负担国家的纵向多层次分析
Health Policy Plan. 2014 May;29(3):328-51. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt020. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
3
Unraveling the impact of environmental provisions in preferential trade agreements on green total factor energy efficiency.解析优惠贸易协定中的环境条款对绿色全要素能源效率的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;362:121205. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121205. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
Toxic trade: the impact of preferential trade agreements on alcohol imports from Australia in partner countries.有毒贸易:优惠贸易协定对澳大利亚在伙伴国家进口酒类的影响。
Addiction. 2020 Jul;115(7):1277-1284. doi: 10.1111/add.14925. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
5
Improving regulatory capacity to manage risks associated with trade agreements.提高管理与贸易协定相关风险的监管能力。
Global Health. 2015 Mar 21;11:14. doi: 10.1186/s12992-015-0099-7.
6
Trade, investment and public health: compiling the evidence, assembling the arguments.贸易、投资与公共卫生:汇集证据,形成观点。
Global Health. 2019 Jan 3;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0425-y.
7
Labor clauses in trade agreements: Hidden protectionism?贸易协定中的劳工条款:隐蔽的保护主义?
Rev Int Organ. 2022;17(3):453-483. doi: 10.1007/s11558-021-09423-3. Epub 2021 May 29.
8
Trade and investment liberalization and Asia's noncommunicable disease epidemic: a synthesis of data and existing literature.贸易与投资自由化及亚洲的非传染性疾病流行:数据与现有文献综述
Global Health. 2014 Sep 12;10:66. doi: 10.1186/s12992-014-0066-8.
9
The influence of regional preferential trade agreements on international manufacturing trade in value-added: Based on the complex network method.区域优惠贸易协定对国际制造业增加值贸易的影响:基于复杂网络方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0246250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246250. eCollection 2021.
10
Disentangling regional trade agreements, trade flows and tobacco affordability in sub-Saharan Africa.解析撒哈拉以南非洲地区的区域贸易协定、贸易流动与烟草可负担性
Global Health. 2017 Nov 14;13(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0305-x.

引用本文的文献

1
EU enlargements, Brexit and value-added trade: A structural gravity approach.欧盟扩张、英国脱欧与增值贸易:一种结构性引力模型方法
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 16;20(4):e0299738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299738. eCollection 2025.
2
Regional integration and export performance of Pakistan: Empirical evidence from the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).巴基斯坦的区域一体化与出口绩效:来自上海合作组织(SCO)的经验证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 17;19(10):e0311984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311984. eCollection 2024.
3
Bananas, coffee and palm oil: The trade of agricultural commodities in the framework of the EU-Colombia free trade agreement.
香蕉、咖啡和棕榈油:欧盟-哥伦比亚自由贸易协定框架下的农产品贸易。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 24;16(8):e0256242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256242. eCollection 2021.