Liu Keibun, Nakamura Kensuke, Katsukawa Hajime, Elhadi Muhammed, Nydahl Peter, Ely Eugene Wesley, Kudchadkar Sapna R, Takahashi Kunihiko, Inoue Shigeaki, Lefor Alan Kawarai, Kesecioglu Jozef, Nishida Osamu
Critical Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland and The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, Japan.
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Mar 12;3(3):e0353. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000353. eCollection 2021 Mar.
To investigate implementation of evidence-based and supportive cares in ICUs, such as the ABCDEF, nutrition therapy, and ICU diary, for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection in ICUs and their association with ICU clinical practice and setting.
A worldwide, 2-day point prevalence study.
The study was carried out on June 3, 2020, and July 1, 2020. A total of 212 ICUs in 38 countries participated. Clinicians in each participating ICU completed web-based online surveys.
The ICU patients with coronavirus disease 2019.
None.
The implementation rate for the elements of the ABCDEF bundle, other supportive ICU care measures, and implementation-associated structures were investigated. Data were collected for 262 patients, of whom 47.3% underwent mechanical ventilation and 4.6% were treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Each element was implemented for the following percentages of patients: elements A (regular pain assessment), 45%; B (both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials), 28%; C (regular sedation assessment), 52%; D (regular delirium assessment), 35%; E (early mobility and exercise), 47%; and F (family engagement and empowerment), 16%. The implementation of element E was 4% for patients on mechanical ventilation and 8% for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Supportive care, such as protein provision throughout the ICU stay (under 1.2 g/kg for more than 50% of the patients) and introduction of ICU diary (25%), was infrequent. Implementation rates of elements A and D were higher in ICUs with specific protocols and fewer ICU beds exclusively for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection. Element E was implemented at a higher rate in ICUs that had more ICU beds assigned for them.
This point prevalence study showed low implementation of the ABCDEF bundle. Specific protocols and the number of ICU beds reserved for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection might be key factors for delivering appropriate supportive care.
调查重症监护病房(ICU)中针对2019冠状病毒病感染患者实施循证护理和支持性护理的情况,如ABCDEF集束化护理、营养治疗和ICU日记,并探究其与ICU临床实践及环境的关联。
一项全球性的为期2天的现况调查研究。
研究于2020年6月3日和2020年7月1日开展。共有来自38个国家的212个ICU参与。每个参与研究的ICU的临床医生完成基于网络的在线调查。
2019冠状病毒病的ICU患者。
无。
调查ABCDEF集束化护理各要素、其他支持性ICU护理措施以及与实施相关的结构的实施率。收集了262例患者的数据,其中47.3%接受机械通气,4.6%接受体外膜肺氧合治疗。各要素在患者中的实施比例如下:要素A(定期疼痛评估),45%;要素B(自主唤醒和呼吸试验),28%;要素C(定期镇静评估),52%;要素D(定期谵妄评估),35%;要素E(早期活动和锻炼),47%;要素F(家庭参与和赋权),16%。接受机械通气的患者要素E的实施率为4%,接受体外膜肺氧合治疗的患者为8%。支持性护理措施,如在整个ICU住院期间提供蛋白质(超过50%的患者低于1.2 g/kg)和引入ICU日记(25%),并不常见。在有特定方案且专门用于2019冠状病毒病感染患者的ICU床位较少的ICU中,要素A和要素D的实施率较高。要素E在分配了更多ICU床位的ICU中实施率较高。
这项现况调查研究显示ABCDEF集束化护理的实施率较低。特定方案以及为2019冠状病毒病感染患者预留的ICU床位数可能是提供适当支持性护理的关键因素。