Department of Neurology and Cerebrovascular Center Seoul National University Bundang HospitalSeoul National University College of Medicine Seongnam Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurology Ilsan Paik HospitalInje University Goyang Republic of Korea.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):e019457. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019457. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
Background It remains unclear whether physicians' attitudes toward timely management of elevated blood pressure affect the risk of stroke recurrence. Methods and Results From a multicenter stroke registry database, we identified 2933 patients with acute ischemic stroke who were admitted to participating centers in 2011, survived at the 1-year follow-up period, and returned to outpatient clinics ≥2 times after discharge. As a surrogate measure of physicians' attitude, individual treatment intensification (TI) scores were calculated by dividing the difference between the frequencies of observed and expected medication changes by the frequency of clinic visits and categorizing them into 5 groups. The association between TI groups and the recurrence of stroke within 1 year was analyzed using hierarchical frailty models, with adjustment for clustering within each hospital and relevant covariates. Mean±SD of the TI score was -0.13±0.28. The TI score groups were significantly associated with increased risk of recurrent stroke compared with Group 3 (TI score range, -0.25 to 0); Group 1 (range, -1 to -0.5), adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 13.43 (95% CI, 5.95-30.35); Group 2 (range, -0.5 to -0.25), adjusted HR 4.59 (95% CI, 2.01-10.46); and Group 4 (TI score 0), adjusted HR 6.60 (95% CI, 3.02-14.45); but not with Group 5 (range, 0-1), adjusted HR 1.68 (95% CI, 0.62-4.56). This elevated risk in the lowest TI score groups persisted when confining analysis to those with hypertension, history of blood pressure-lowering medication, no atrial fibrillation, and regular clinic visits and stratifying the subjects by functional capacity at discharge. Conclusions A low TI score, which implies physicians' therapeutic inertia in blood pressure management, was associated with a higher risk of recurrent stroke. The TI score may be a useful performance indicator in the outpatient clinic setting to prevent recurrent stroke.
背景 目前尚不清楚医生对及时控制血压升高的态度是否会影响中风复发的风险。
方法和结果 我们从一个多中心中风登记数据库中,确定了 2933 名急性缺血性中风患者,他们在 2011 年被收入参与中心,在 1 年随访期间存活下来,并在出院后至少 2 次返回门诊就诊。作为医生态度的替代衡量指标,通过将观察到的和预期的药物变化频率之间的差异除以就诊次数来计算个体治疗强化(TI)评分,并将其分为 5 组。使用分层脆弱性模型分析 TI 组与 1 年内中风复发的关系,调整了每个医院内的聚类和相关协变量。TI 评分的平均值±标准差为-0.13±0.28。与第 3 组(TI 评分范围,-0.25 至 0)相比,TI 评分组与中风复发的风险增加显著相关;第 1 组(范围,-1 至-0.5),调整后的危险比(HR)为 13.43(95%可信区间,5.95-30.35);第 2 组(范围,-0.5 至-0.25),调整后的 HR 为 4.59(95%可信区间,2.01-10.46);第 4 组(TI 评分为 0),调整后的 HR 为 6.60(95%可信区间,3.02-14.45);但与第 5 组(范围,0-1)无关,调整后的 HR 为 1.68(95%可信区间,0.62-4.56)。当将分析仅限于那些有高血压、降压药物治疗史、无房颤和定期门诊就诊的患者,并按出院时的功能能力对受试者进行分层时,最低 TI 评分组的这种风险增加仍然存在。
结论 低 TI 评分提示医生在血压管理方面存在治疗惰性,与中风复发风险增加相关。TI 评分可能是门诊环境中预防中风复发的一个有用的绩效指标。