• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法语版Catquest-9SF的效度及使用电子记事本录入患者报告结局指标的情况

Validity of the French version of Catquest-9SF and use of an electronic notepad for entering patient-reported outcome measures.

作者信息

Katz Gregory, Rouquette Alexandra, Lignereux François, Mourgues Thierry, Weber Michel, Lundström Mats

机构信息

Chair of Innovation & Value in Health, University of Paris School of Medicine, Paris, France.

Value-Based Health Care Consortium, Paris, France.

出版信息

Eye Vis (Lond). 2021 Apr 1;8(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40662-021-00233-7.

DOI:10.1186/s40662-021-00233-7
PMID:33789766
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8015069/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Catquest-9SF questionnaire is a patient reported outcome measure that quantifies the visual benefits from cataract surgery. The purpose of this study was to translate and adapt the Catquest-9SF questionnaire for France, to assess its psychometric properties via Rasch analysis, and to assess its validity when completed using an electronic notepad.

METHODS

The Catquest-9SF questionnaire was translated following the guidelines of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. Catquest-9SF and clinical data were collected from patients before and after routine cataract surgery. All questionnaire data were collected via an electronic notepad. Rasch analysis was performed to assess psychometric properties, and sensitivity to change was analysed for patients with complete paired pre- and post-operative questionnaires.

RESULTS

A complete filled-in preoperative questionnaire was obtained for 848 patients. Rasch analysis showed good precision (person separation: 2.32, person reliability: 0.84), ordered category probability curves, no item misfit, and unidimensionality. The respondents were slightly more able than the level of item difficulty (targeting: -1.12 logits). Sensitivity was analysed on 211 paired questionnaires, and the postoperative questionnaires showed a clear ceiling effect. The effect size was 2.6. The use of an electronic notepad for completing the questionnaire worked out very well after some adjustments.

CONCLUSIONS

The French version of Catquest-9SF has good psychometric properties and is suitable for use in French-speaking patients. The use of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire in an electronic format showed good validity.

摘要

背景

Catquest-9SF问卷是一种患者报告结局指标,用于量化白内障手术带来的视觉益处。本研究的目的是将Catquest-9SF问卷翻译成法语并进行适应性调整,通过拉施分析评估其心理测量特性,并评估使用电子记事本填写时的有效性。

方法

按照国际药物经济学和结局研究协会的指南对Catquest-9SF问卷进行翻译。在常规白内障手术前后收集患者的Catquest-9SF问卷和临床数据。所有问卷数据均通过电子记事本收集。进行拉施分析以评估心理测量特性,并对术前和术后问卷完整配对的患者分析其对变化的敏感性。

结果

共获得848例患者完整填写的术前问卷。拉施分析显示精度良好(人员分离度:2.32,人员信度:0.84),有序类别概率曲线良好,无项目不匹配,且具有单维度性。受访者的能力略高于项目难度水平(目标定位:-1.12对数单位)。对211对配对问卷进行了敏感性分析,术后问卷显示出明显的天花板效应。效应大小为2.6。经过一些调整后,使用电子记事本填写问卷效果良好。

结论

法语版的Catquest-9SF具有良好的心理测量特性,适用于说法语的患者。以电子格式使用Catquest-9SF问卷显示出良好的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fb7/8015069/50ca565af77d/40662_2021_233_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fb7/8015069/d315fbbf4e70/40662_2021_233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fb7/8015069/ad9ccc5ec6f2/40662_2021_233_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fb7/8015069/8ccb347605c2/40662_2021_233_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fb7/8015069/7a31fa5ea4b3/40662_2021_233_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fb7/8015069/50ca565af77d/40662_2021_233_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fb7/8015069/d315fbbf4e70/40662_2021_233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fb7/8015069/ad9ccc5ec6f2/40662_2021_233_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fb7/8015069/8ccb347605c2/40662_2021_233_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fb7/8015069/7a31fa5ea4b3/40662_2021_233_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fb7/8015069/50ca565af77d/40662_2021_233_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity of the French version of Catquest-9SF and use of an electronic notepad for entering patient-reported outcome measures.法语版Catquest-9SF的效度及使用电子记事本录入患者报告结局指标的情况
Eye Vis (Lond). 2021 Apr 1;8(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40662-021-00233-7.
2
Catquest-9SF questionnaire: Validation in a Greek-speaking population using Rasch analysis.Catquest-9SF 问卷:基于 Rasch 分析的希腊语人群验证。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 7;17(12):e0278683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278683. eCollection 2022.
3
Catquest-9SF questionnaire: validation of Malay and Chinese-language versions using Rasch analysis.Catquest-9SF 问卷:使用 Rasch 分析验证马来语和汉语版本。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jan 5;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0833-3.
4
The Italian Catquest-9SF cataract questionnaire: translation, validation and application.意大利 Catquest-9SF 白内障问卷:翻译、验证和应用。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2016 Apr 28;3:12. doi: 10.1186/s40662-016-0043-9. eCollection 2016.
5
Catquest-9SF questionnaire and eCAPS: Validation in a Canadian population.Catquest-9SF 问卷和 eCAPS:在加拿大人群中的验证。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 25;15(9):e0237788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237788. eCollection 2020.
6
Validation of Catquest-9SF in Danish: developing a revised form of the Catquest-9SF - the Danish Catquest-7SF.丹麦版 Catquest-9SF 的验证:开发 Catquest-9SF 的修订版——丹麦版 Catquest-7SF。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;97(2):173-177. doi: 10.1111/aos.13921. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
7
Validation, test-retest reliability and norm scores for the Dutch Catquest-9SF.荷兰版Catquest-9SF的效度、重测信度及常模分数
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 May;95(3):312-319. doi: 10.1111/aos.13287. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
8
Multi-center validation of Catquest-9SF visual function questionnaire in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省 Catquest-9SF 视觉功能问卷的多中心验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 6;18(7):e0278863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278863. eCollection 2023.
9
Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire: nine-item short-form Rasch-scaled revision of the Catquest questionnaire.Catquest-9SF患者结局问卷:Catquest问卷的九项简版拉施量表修订版。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):504-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.038.
10
The outcome of cataract surgery measured with the Catquest-9SF.采用 Catquest-9SF 评估白内障手术的结果。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec;89(8):718-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01801.x. Epub 2009 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-center validation of Catquest-9SF visual function questionnaire in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省 Catquest-9SF 视觉功能问卷的多中心验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 6;18(7):e0278863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278863. eCollection 2023.
2
Catquest-9SF questionnaire: Validation in a Greek-speaking population using Rasch analysis.Catquest-9SF 问卷:基于 Rasch 分析的希腊语人群验证。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 7;17(12):e0278683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278683. eCollection 2022.
3
Validation of the French version of the ICHOM adult oral health standard set.

本文引用的文献

1
Changing practice patterns in European cataract surgery as reflected in the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2008 to 2017.2008 年至 2017 年欧洲白内障和屈光手术质量结果登记研究反映的欧洲白内障手术实践模式的改变。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Mar 1;47(3):373-378. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000457.
2
Definition and clinical relevance of the concept of functional vision in cataract surgery ESCRS Position Statement on Intermediate Vision: ESCRS Functional Vision Working Group.白内障手术中功能性视力概念的定义及临床相关性:欧洲白内障与屈光手术医师学会(ESCRS)关于中间视力的立场声明:ESCRS功能性视力工作组
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Feb;46 Suppl 1:S1-S3. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000096.
3
验证 ICHOM 成人口腔健康标准集的法语文本。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Feb;9(1):142-149. doi: 10.1002/cre2.682. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Catquest-9SF questionnaire shows greater visual functioning in bilateral cataract populations: A prospective study.Catquest-9SF 问卷在双侧白内障人群中显示出更好的视觉功能:一项前瞻性研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov;70(11):3820-3826. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_736_22.
Validation of Catquest-9SF in Danish: developing a revised form of the Catquest-9SF - the Danish Catquest-7SF.丹麦版 Catquest-9SF 的验证:开发 Catquest-9SF 的修订版——丹麦版 Catquest-7SF。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;97(2):173-177. doi: 10.1111/aos.13921. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
4
Validation of the Spanish Catquest-9SF in patients with a monofocal or trifocal intraocular lens.西班牙版Catquest-9SF在单焦点或三焦点人工晶状体患者中的验证。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Dec;42(12):1791-1796. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.10.011.
5
Validation, test-retest reliability and norm scores for the Dutch Catquest-9SF.荷兰版Catquest-9SF的效度、重测信度及常模分数
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 May;95(3):312-319. doi: 10.1111/aos.13287. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
6
The Italian Catquest-9SF cataract questionnaire: translation, validation and application.意大利 Catquest-9SF 白内障问卷:翻译、验证和应用。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2016 Apr 28;3:12. doi: 10.1186/s40662-016-0043-9. eCollection 2016.
7
A Proposed Minimum Standard Set of Outcome Measures for Cataract Surgery.白内障手术结局评估的最低标准建议集。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov;133(11):1247-52. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.2810.
8
Indication for cataract surgery. Do we have evidence of who will benefit from surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.白内障手术的适应症。我们是否有证据表明谁将从手术中获益?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;94(1):10-20. doi: 10.1111/aos.12758. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
9
Determinants of patient satisfaction and function related to vision following cataract surgery in eyes with no visually consequential ocular co-morbidity.无视力相关眼部合并症的白内障手术患者的视觉满意度及视觉相关功能的决定因素。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Oct;253(10):1735-44. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3038-7. Epub 2015 May 13.
10
Validation of Catquest-9SF questionnaire in a Chinese cataract population.Catquest-9SF问卷在中国白内障人群中的效度验证。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 1;9(8):e103860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103860. eCollection 2014.