• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How to create PICO questions about diagnostic tests.如何创建关于诊断测试的PICO问题。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021 Mar 31;26(4):155-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111676.
2
Evidence-Based Guidelines for Fatigue Risk Management in EMS: Formulating Research Questions and Selecting Outcomes.急救医疗服务中疲劳风险管理的循证指南：提出研究问题与选择结果
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Mar-Apr;21(2):149-156. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1241329. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
3
A women's health track for internal medicine residents using evidence-based medicine.一条针对内科住院医师的、采用循证医学的女性健康培训路径。
Acad Med. 2002 Jul;77(7):743-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200207000-00031.
4
Rethinking PICO in the Machine Learning Era: ML-PICO.重新思考机器学习时代的 PICO：ML-PICO。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Mar;12(2):407-416. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729752. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions.评估PICO作为临床问题的知识表示形式。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:359-63.
6
A call to action for evidence-based military women's health care: developing a women's health research agenda that addresses sex and gender in health and illness.呼吁制定循证的军事女性健康护理措施：制定一个女性健康研究议程，解决健康和疾病中的性别问题。
Biol Res Nurs. 2010 Oct;12(2):171-7. doi: 10.1177/1099800410375299. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
7
Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women's healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation - EVERYWOMAN.研究方案：平价医疗法案实施后安全网中妇女保健的混合方法研究 - EVERYWOMAN。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jun 11;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0445-y.
8
Services for women's sexual and reproductive health in India: an analysis of treatment-seeking for symptoms of reproductive tract infections in a nationally representative survey.印度女性性与生殖健康服务：一项全国代表性调查中对生殖道感染症状寻求治疗的分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Jul 28;20(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01024-3.
9
Women's preferences for and views on decision-making for diagnostic tests.女性对诊断测试决策的偏好与看法。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(9):1699-707. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00339-3.
10
PICO: What it is and what it is not.PICO：它是什么，以及它不是什么。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Oct;56:103194. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103194. Epub 2021 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Salivary MicroRNAs as Potential Noninvasive Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Protocol for a Scoping Review.唾液微小RNA作为鼻咽癌诊断的潜在非侵入性生物标志物：一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 4;14:e69484. doi: 10.2196/69484.
2
Performance of Diagnostic Breast Imaging in Symptomatic Pregnant and Lactating Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.有症状的怀孕和哺乳期患者的乳腺诊断成像性能：系统评价和荟萃分析
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 May;7(3):e240281. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240281.
3
The Diagnostic Blind Spot in Early Medical Education.早期医学教育中的诊断盲点
Fam Med. 2025 May 20;57(6):458-9. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2025.135278.
4
Clinical Questions Addressed by First-Year Medical Students in Primary Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.一年级医学生在初级保健中提出的临床问题：一项横断面研究。
Fam Med. 2025 Apr;57(4):261-267. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2025.381934. Epub 2025 Feb 15.
5
Accuracy of online symptom assessment applications, large language models, and laypeople for self-triage decisions.在线症状评估应用程序、大语言模型和非专业人员进行自我分诊决策的准确性。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Mar 25;8(1):178. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01566-6.
6
How to Design a Study and Write a Grant in Radiology?如何设计放射学研究并撰写科研基金申请书？
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan 9;35(Suppl 1):S136-S142. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1792077. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
PRIDASE 2024 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in endodontics: Explanation and elaboration.PRIDASE 2024牙髓病学诊断准确性研究报告指南：解释与阐述
Int Endod J. 2025 Jan;58(1):6-36. doi: 10.1111/iej.14148. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
8
Respiratory Syncytial Virus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Tomographic Findings (2000-2022).呼吸道合胞病毒：断层扫描结果的系统评价与荟萃分析（2000 - 2022年）
Children (Basel). 2023 Jul 5;10(7):1169. doi: 10.3390/children10071169.
9
Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021.执行摘要：意大利 2021 年脆性骨折的诊断、风险分层和护理连续性指南。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 18;14:1137671. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1137671. eCollection 2023.
10
Prediction of medical sciences students' performance on high-stakes examinations using machine learning models: a protocol for a systematic review.基于机器学习模型预测医学生在高风险考试中的表现：系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 4;13(5):e064956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064956.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality: Quasi-experimental evidence from rollout of the Dutch population-based program with 17-year follow-up of a cohort.筛查性乳腺 X 光摄影对乳腺癌死亡率的影响：基于荷兰人群的项目开展的准实验证据，该项目对队列进行了 17 年的随访。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Apr 15;146(8):2201-2208. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32584. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
2
Systematic reviews as a 'lens of evidence': Determinants of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening.系统评价作为“证据之镜”：乳腺癌筛查的获益与危害的决定因素。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Aug 15;145(4):994-1006. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32211. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
3
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews.考科蓝诊断试验准确性综述。
Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 7;2:82. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-82.
4
Screening for breast cancer with mammography.通过乳房X线摄影术筛查乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 4;2013(6):CD001877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub5.
5
Assessing the value of diagnostic tests: a framework for designing and evaluating trials.评估诊断试验的价值：设计和评估试验的框架
BMJ. 2012 Feb 21;344:e686. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e686.
6
Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways.比较准确性：针对现有诊断途径评估新测试
BMJ. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1089-92. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1089.
7
The Evidence Based Medicine approach to diagnostic testing: practicalities and limitations.基于循证医学的诊断性检测方法：实用性与局限性
Clin Biochem Rev. 2005 May;26(2):7-18.
8
Evaluation of diagnostic procedures.诊断程序的评估。
BMJ. 2002 Feb 23;324(7335):477-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7335.477.
9
Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis.评估乳腺钼靶筛查的准确性：一项荟萃分析。
Am J Prev Med. 1998 Feb;14(2):143-53. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(97)00019-6.
10
The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions.构建完善的临床问题：循证决策的关键。
ACP J Club. 1995 Nov-Dec;123(3):A12-3.

How to create PICO questions about diagnostic tests.

作者信息

Luijendijk Hendrika J

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

出版信息

BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021 Mar 31;26(4):155-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111676.

DOI:10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111676
PMID:33789913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8311106/
Abstract
摘要