From the School of Public Health Sciences (Hall, Fong, Oremus, Sakib, Butt, Jandu, Morita) and Department of Psychology (Hall, Fong), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience (Sheeran), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (Fong), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychology (Cheah), University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine (Liu-Ambrose), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems (Ayaz) and Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences (Ayaz), Drexel University; and Department of Family and Community Health (Ayaz), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Psychosom Med. 2021 May 1;83(4):309-321. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000932.
This review highlights the scope and significance of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with a focus on biobehavioral aspects and critical avenues for research.
A narrative review of the published research literature was undertaken, highlighting major empirical findings emerging during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Interactions among biological, behavioral, and societal processes were prominent across all regions of the globe during the first year of the COVID-19 emergency. Affective, cognitive, behavioral, socioeconomic, and technological factors all played a significant role in the spread of infection, response precautions, and outcomes of mitigation efforts. Affective symptoms, suicidality, and cognitive dysfunction have been widely described consequences of the infection, the economic fallout, and the necessary public health mitigation measures themselves. The impact of COVID-19 may be especially serious for those living with severe mental illness and/or chronic medical diseases, given the confluence of several adverse factors in a manner that appears to have syndemic potential.
The COVID-19 pandemic has made clear that biological and behavioral factors interact with societal processes in the infectious disease context. Empirical research examining mechanistic pathways from infection and recovery to immunological, behavioral, and emotional outcomes is critical. Examination of how emotional and behavioral factors relate to the pandemic-both as causes and as effects-can provide valuable insights that can improve management of the current pandemic and future pandemics to come.
本综述重点关注生物行为方面以及关键研究途径,强调 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的范围和意义。
对已发表的研究文献进行叙述性综述,重点介绍 COVID-19 大流行的第一波和第二波期间出现的主要实证发现。
在 COVID-19 紧急情况的第一年,全球所有地区的生物、行为和社会进程之间都存在着相互作用。情感、认知、行为、社会经济和技术因素都在感染传播、预防措施以及缓解努力的结果中发挥了重要作用。感染、经济影响以及必要的公共卫生缓解措施本身都导致了广泛描述的感染后果,包括情感症状、自杀意念和认知功能障碍。对于那些患有严重精神疾病和/或慢性疾病的人来说,COVID-19 的影响可能尤其严重,因为在这种情况下,几种不利因素汇聚在一起,似乎具有综合征的潜力。
COVID-19 大流行清楚地表明,在传染病背景下,生物和行为因素与社会进程相互作用。检查从感染和恢复到免疫、行为和情绪结果的机制途径的实证研究至关重要。研究情感和行为因素与大流行的关系——既是原因又是结果——可以提供宝贵的见解,从而改善对当前大流行和未来大流行的管理。