• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

审视新冠疫情期间共享单车使用的时空变化模式。

Examining spatiotemporal changing patterns of bike-sharing usage during COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Hu Songhua, Xiong Chenfeng, Liu Zhanqin, Zhang Lei

机构信息

Maryland Transportation Institute (MTI), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, United States of America.

Shock Trauma and Anesthesiology Research (STAR) Center, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States of America.

出版信息

J Transp Geogr. 2021 Feb;91:102997. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.102997. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.102997
PMID:33642707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7894132/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a globally unprecedented change in human mobility. Leveraging two-year bike-sharing trips from the largest bike-sharing program in Chicago, this study examines the spatiotemporal evolution of bike-sharing usage across the pandemic and compares it with other modes of transport. A set of generalized additive (mixed) models are fitted to identify relationships and delineate nonlinear temporal interactions between station-level daily bike-sharing usage and various independent variables including socio-demographics, land use, transportation features, station characteristics, and COVID-19 infections. Results show: 1) the proportion of commuting trips is substantially lower during the pandemic; 2) the trend of bike-sharing usage follows an "increase-decrease-rebound" pattern; 3) bike-sharing presents as a more resilient option compared with transit, driving, and walking; 4) regions with more white, Asian, and fewer African-American residents are found to become less dependent on bike-sharing; 5) open space and residential areas exhibit less decrease and earlier start-to-recover time; 6) stations near the city center, with more docks, or located in high-income areas go from more increase before the pandemic to more decrease during the pandemic. Findings provide a timely understanding of bike-sharing usage changes and offer suggestions on how different stakeholders should respond to this unprecedented crisis.

摘要

新冠疫情导致全球人类出行发生了前所未有的变化。本研究利用芝加哥最大的共享单车项目的两年骑行数据,考察了疫情期间共享单车使用情况的时空演变,并将其与其他交通方式进行了比较。通过拟合一组广义相加(混合)模型,以确定站点级每日共享单车使用量与包括社会人口统计学、土地利用、交通特征、站点特征以及新冠感染病例等各种自变量之间的关系,并描绘非线性时间交互作用。结果表明:1)疫情期间通勤出行的比例大幅降低;2)共享单车使用量的趋势呈“增加-减少-反弹”模式;3)与公交、驾车和步行相比,共享单车是一种更具韧性的出行选择;4)发现白人、亚裔居民较多而非洲裔居民较少的地区对共享单车的依赖程度降低;5)开放空间和居民区的使用量下降较少且恢复时间较早;6)市中心附近、有更多停车桩或位于高收入地区的站点,从疫情前使用量增加较多转变为疫情期间下降较多。研究结果及时揭示了共享单车使用情况的变化,并就不同利益相关者应如何应对这一前所未有的危机提供了建议。

相似文献

1
Examining spatiotemporal changing patterns of bike-sharing usage during COVID-19 pandemic.审视新冠疫情期间共享单车使用的时空变化模式。
J Transp Geogr. 2021 Feb;91:102997. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.102997. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
2
Evolvement patterns of usage in a medium-sized bike-sharing system during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间一个中型共享单车系统的使用演变模式。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 Sep;96:104669. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104669. Epub 2023 May 24.
3
Investigation on changes in the usage patterns of Seoul Bike usage patterns owing to COVID-19 according to pass type.根据通行证类型对因新冠疫情导致的首尔共享单车使用模式变化的调查。
Heliyon. 2023 May;9(5):e16077. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16077. Epub 2023 May 10.
4
A long-term perspective on the COVID-19: The bike sharing system resilience under the epidemic environment.对新冠疫情的长期展望:疫情环境下共享单车系统的恢复力
J Transp Health. 2022 Sep;26:101460. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101460. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
5
Should bike-sharing continue operating during the COVID-19 pandemic? Empirical findings from Nanjing, China.在新冠疫情期间共享单车是否应继续运营?来自中国南京的实证研究结果。
J Transp Health. 2021 Dec;23:101264. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101264. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
6
Changes in public bike usage after the COVID-19 outbreak: A survey of Seoul public bike sharing users.新冠疫情爆发后公共自行车使用情况的变化:一项对首尔公共自行车共享用户的调查。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 Sep;96:104716. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104716. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
7
Exploring the spatiotemporal factors affecting bicycle-sharing demand during the COVID-19 pandemic.探索新冠疫情期间影响共享单车需求的时空因素。
Transportation (Amst). 2023 Mar 14:1-36. doi: 10.1007/s11116-023-10378-0.
8
Analysis of spatiotemporal mobility of shared-bike usage during COVID-19 pandemic in Beijing.新冠疫情期间北京共享单车使用的时空流动性分析
Trans GIS. 2021 Dec;25(6):2866-2887. doi: 10.1111/tgis.12784. Epub 2021 Sep 5.
9
The role of bike sharing during the coronavirus pandemic: An analysis of the mobility patterns and perceptions of Lisbon's users.新冠疫情期间共享单车的作用:对里斯本用户出行模式及看法的分析
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2022 May;159:17-34. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
10
Impacts of COVID-19 on bike-sharing usages in Seoul, South Korea.新冠疫情对韩国首尔共享单车使用情况的影响。
Cities. 2022 Nov;130:103849. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103849. Epub 2022 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the spatiotemporal factors affecting bicycle-sharing demand during the COVID-19 pandemic.探索新冠疫情期间影响共享单车需求的时空因素。
Transportation (Amst). 2023 Mar 14:1-36. doi: 10.1007/s11116-023-10378-0.
2
Changes in public bike usage after the COVID-19 outbreak: A survey of Seoul public bike sharing users.新冠疫情爆发后公共自行车使用情况的变化:一项对首尔公共自行车共享用户的调查。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 Sep;96:104716. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104716. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
3
Evolvement patterns of usage in a medium-sized bike-sharing system during the COVID-19 pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of COVID-19 on Public Transit Accessibility and Ridership.新冠疫情对公共交通可达性及客流量的影响。
Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):531-546. doi: 10.1177/03611981231160531. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
2
Promoting public bike-sharing: A lesson from the unsuccessful Pronto system.推广公共自行车共享:从失败的Pronto系统中吸取的教训。
Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2018 Aug;63:533-547. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.06.021. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
3
Understanding socioeconomic disparities in travel behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.了解新冠疫情期间出行行为中的社会经济差异。
新冠疫情期间一个中型共享单车系统的使用演变模式。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 Sep;96:104669. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104669. Epub 2023 May 24.
4
Sustainable response strategy for COVID-19: Pandemic zoning with urban multimodal transport data.COVID-19的可持续应对策略:利用城市多模式交通数据进行大流行分区
J Transp Geogr. 2023 Jun;110:103605. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103605. Epub 2023 May 17.
5
Investigation on changes in the usage patterns of Seoul Bike usage patterns owing to COVID-19 according to pass type.根据通行证类型对因新冠疫情导致的首尔共享单车使用模式变化的调查。
Heliyon. 2023 May;9(5):e16077. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16077. Epub 2023 May 10.
6
Shared E-Scooter Trajectory Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Austin, Texas.德克萨斯州奥斯汀市新冠疫情期间共享电动滑板车轨迹分析
Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):432-447. doi: 10.1177/03611981221083306. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
7
Who changed and who maintained their urban bike-sharing mobility after the COVID-19 outbreak? A within-subjects study.在新冠疫情爆发后,哪些人改变了,哪些人保持了他们的城市共享单车出行方式?一项受试者内研究。
Cities. 2023 Jun;137:104343. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104343. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
8
Interaction between travel restriction policies and the spread of COVID-19.旅行限制政策与新冠病毒传播之间的相互作用。
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2023 Jun;136:209-227. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
9
Discovering spatiotemporal usage patterns of a bike-sharing system by type of pass: a case study from Seoul.按通行证类型发现共享单车系统的时空使用模式:以首尔为例的研究
Transportation (Amst). 2023 Feb 21:1-35. doi: 10.1007/s11116-023-10371-7.
10
Executive orders or public fear: What caused transit ridership to drop in Chicago during COVID-19?行政命令还是公众恐惧:是什么导致新冠疫情期间芝加哥的公共交通客流量下降?
Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2022 Apr;105:103226. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103226. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
J Reg Sci. 2021 Sep;61(4):753-774. doi: 10.1111/jors.12527. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
How is COVID-19 reshaping activity-travel behavior? Evidence from a comprehensive survey in Chicago.新冠病毒如何重塑出行行为?来自芝加哥一项综合调查的证据。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Sep;7:100216. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100216. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
5
The link between bike sharing and subway use during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case-study of New York's Citi Bike.新冠疫情期间共享单车与地铁使用之间的联系:纽约花旗单车的案例研究
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100166. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
Modal share changes due to COVID-19: The case of Budapest.因新冠疫情导致的出行方式份额变化:以布达佩斯为例。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Nov;8:100141. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100141. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
7
The effect of COVID-19 and subsequent social distancing on travel behavior.新冠疫情及后续社交距离措施对出行行为的影响。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 May;5:100121. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100121. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
8
A big-data driven approach to analyzing and modeling human mobility trend under non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19 pandemic.一种大数据驱动的方法,用于分析和建模新冠疫情期间非药物干预下的人类流动趋势。
Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2021 Mar;124:102955. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102955. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
9
Socioeconomic Disparities in Subway Use and COVID-19 Outcomes in New York City.地铁使用与纽约市 COVID-19 结局的社会经济差异。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 1;190(7):1234-1242. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa277.
10
Mobile device location data reveal human mobility response to state-level stay-at-home orders during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.移动设备位置数据揭示了美国 COVID-19 大流行期间,人类对州级居家令的移动响应。
J R Soc Interface. 2020 Dec;17(173):20200344. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0344. Epub 2020 Dec 16.