• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同韵律线索对分词的影响

The Influence of Different Prosodic Cues on Word Segmentation.

作者信息

Matzinger Theresa, Ritt Nikolaus, Fitch W Tecumseh

机构信息

Department of English, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 16;12:622042. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.622042. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.622042
PMID:33796045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8007974/
Abstract

A prerequisite for spoken language learning is segmenting continuous speech into words. Amongst many possible cues to identify word boundaries, listeners can use both transitional probabilities between syllables and various prosodic cues. However, the relative importance of these cues remains unclear, and previous experiments have not directly compared the effects of contrasting multiple prosodic cues. We used artificial language learning experiments, where native German speaking participants extracted meaningless trisyllabic "words" from a continuous speech stream, to evaluate these factors. We compared a baseline condition (statistical cues only) to five test conditions, in which word-final syllables were either (a) followed by a pause, (b) lengthened, (c) shortened, (d) changed to a lower pitch, or (e) changed to a higher pitch. To evaluate robustness and generality we used three tasks varying in difficulty. Overall, pauses and final lengthening were perceived as converging with the statistical cues and facilitated speech segmentation, with pauses helping most. Final-syllable shortening hindered baseline speech segmentation, indicating that when cues conflict, prosodic cues can override statistical cues. Surprisingly, pitch cues had little effect, suggesting that duration may be more relevant for speech segmentation than pitch in our study context. We discuss our findings with regard to the contribution to speech segmentation of language-universal boundary cues vs. language-specific stress patterns.

摘要

口语学习的一个前提条件是将连续的语音分割成单词。在众多识别单词边界的可能线索中,听者既可以利用音节之间的过渡概率,也可以利用各种韵律线索。然而,这些线索的相对重要性仍不明确,而且先前的实验并未直接比较多种对比韵律线索的效果。我们采用人工语言学习实验来评估这些因素,在实验中,以德语为母语的参与者从连续的语音流中提取无意义的三音节“单词”。我们将一个基线条件(仅统计线索)与五个测试条件进行了比较,在测试条件中,词尾音节要么(a)后面跟着一个停顿,(b)被延长,(c)被缩短,(d)变为较低的音高,要么(e)变为较高的音高。为了评估稳健性和普遍性,我们使用了三个难度不同的任务。总体而言,停顿和词尾延长被认为与统计线索一致,并促进了语音分割,其中停顿的帮助最大。词尾音节缩短阻碍了基线语音分割,这表明当线索冲突时,韵律线索可以超越统计线索。令人惊讶的是,音高线索影响很小,这表明在我们的研究背景下,时长可能比音高对语音分割更重要。我们结合语言通用边界线索与特定语言重音模式对语音分割的贡献来讨论我们的研究结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/f613de033475/fpsyg-12-622042-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/d5d448a1ac02/fpsyg-12-622042-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/84e3d0cc733e/fpsyg-12-622042-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/66542bc991c8/fpsyg-12-622042-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/271b231d6ef5/fpsyg-12-622042-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/9a2cc0059627/fpsyg-12-622042-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/61660bdd5c5e/fpsyg-12-622042-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/bc2378bcdbc7/fpsyg-12-622042-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/c20713493f8f/fpsyg-12-622042-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/f613de033475/fpsyg-12-622042-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/d5d448a1ac02/fpsyg-12-622042-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/84e3d0cc733e/fpsyg-12-622042-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/66542bc991c8/fpsyg-12-622042-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/271b231d6ef5/fpsyg-12-622042-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/9a2cc0059627/fpsyg-12-622042-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/61660bdd5c5e/fpsyg-12-622042-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/bc2378bcdbc7/fpsyg-12-622042-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/c20713493f8f/fpsyg-12-622042-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/8007974/f613de033475/fpsyg-12-622042-g0009.jpg

相似文献

1
The Influence of Different Prosodic Cues on Word Segmentation.不同韵律线索对分词的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 16;12:622042. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.622042. eCollection 2021.
2
Prosody outweighs statistics in 6-month-old German-learning infants' speech segmentation.在 6 个月大的学习德语的婴儿的言语分割中,韵律胜过统计学。
Infancy. 2024 Sep-Oct;29(5):750-770. doi: 10.1111/infa.12593. Epub 2024 May 4.
3
Prosody enhances learning of statistical dependencies from continuous speech streams in adults.韵律有助于成年人从连续语音流中学习统计依赖性。
Cognition. 2025 Sep;262:106169. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106169. Epub 2025 May 10.
4
Prosody-driven syntax learning is robust to impoverished pitch and spectral cues.韵律驱动的句法学习对贫乏的音高和频谱线索具有鲁棒性。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 May;143(5):2756. doi: 10.1121/1.5031130.
5
Pupillary entrainment reveals individual differences in cue weighting in 9-month-old German-learning infants.瞳孔追踪揭示了 9 个月大德国语学习婴儿在 cue weighting 方面的个体差异。
Cognition. 2022 Jul;224:105054. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105054. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
6
Beneficial effects of word final stress in segmenting a new language: evidence from ERPs.词尾重音在新语言切分中的有益作用:来自事件相关电位的证据。
BMC Neurosci. 2008 Feb 18;9:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-9-23.
7
Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action.语音与动作中处理边界线索的相似之处。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1566. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01566. eCollection 2019.
8
Lexical Segmentation in Artificial Word Learning: The Effects of Converging Sublexical Cues.人工单词学习中的词汇切分:汇聚性次词汇线索的影响
Lang Speech. 2018 Mar;61(1):3-30. doi: 10.1177/0023830917694664. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
9
Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.对第二语言的体验会影响语音分割中基频的使用。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181709. eCollection 2017.
10
At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics.在11个月大时,韵律仍然比统计数据更重要。
Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):131-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00740.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) recognise meaningful content in monotonous streams of read speech.家犬(犬属)能够识别单调朗读语音流中的有意义内容。
Anim Cogn. 2025 Apr 12;28(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01948-z.
2
A neuro-cognitive model of comprehension based on prediction and unification.一种基于预测和整合的理解神经认知模型。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Apr 9;18:1356541. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1356541. eCollection 2024.
3
Jordanian EFL Students' Perception of Noncontrastive Allophonic Cues in English Speech Segmentation.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-native speaker pause patterns closely correspond to those of native speakers at different speech rates.非母语说话者的停顿模式与母语说话者在不同语速下的停顿模式非常吻合。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 3;15(4):e0230710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230710. eCollection 2020.
2
A Comparative Perspective on the Role of Acoustic Cues in Detecting Language Structure.声学线索在探测语言结构中的作用的比较视角。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Jul;12(3):859-874. doi: 10.1111/tops.12373. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
3
Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis.
约旦英语外语学生对英语语音切分中非对比性协同发音特征的感知。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Oct;52(5):1455-1469. doi: 10.1007/s10936-023-09944-5. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
4
Voice modulatory cues to structure across languages and species.跨语言和物种的语音调节线索。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Dec 20;376(1840):20200393. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0393. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
心理学、科学与知识构建:从复制危机看视角的拓展。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:487-510. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845.
4
Cross-linguistic differences in the use of durational cues for the segmentation of a novel language.在使用时长线索对一种新语言进行切分时的跨语言差异。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Jul;45(5):863-876. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0700-9.
5
Mandarin-English Bilinguals Process Lexical Tones in Newly Learned Words in Accordance with the Language Context.普通话-英语双语者会根据语言环境对新学单词中的声调进行处理。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0169001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169001. eCollection 2017.
6
Domain-general mechanisms for speech segmentation: The role of duration information in language learning.语音分割的通用机制:时长信息在语言学习中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Mar;43(3):466-476. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000325. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
7
An Exploration of Rhythmic Grouping of Speech Sequences by French- and German-Learning Infants.学习法语和德语的婴儿对语音序列节奏分组的探索。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jun 14;10:292. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00292. eCollection 2016.
8
Speech segmentation by statistical learning is supported by domain-general processes within working memory.工作记忆中的领域通用过程支持通过统计学习进行语音分割。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Dec;69(12):2390-2401. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1112825. Epub 2016 May 11.
9
Neural correlates of prosodic boundary perception in German preschoolers: If pause is present, pitch can go.德国学龄前儿童韵律边界感知的神经关联:如果有停顿,音高可以变化。
Brain Res. 2016 Feb 1;1632:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
10
A multimodal corpus of speech to infant and adult listeners.一个面向婴儿和成人听众的多模态语音语料库。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Dec;134(6):EL534. doi: 10.1121/1.4828977.