Rabinovich D, Haran T, Eisenstein M, Shakked Z
Department of Structural Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot, Israel.
J Mol Biol. 1988 Mar 5;200(1):151-61. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90340-3.
The mismatched duplex d(GGGTGCCC) (I) and its two Watson-Crick analogues (dGGGCGCCC) (II) and d(GGGTACCC) (III) were synthesized. The X-ray crystal structures of (I) and (II) were determined at resolutions of 2.5 and 1.7 A (1 A = 0.1 nm) and refined to R factors of 15 and 16%, respectively. (I) and (II) crystallize as A-DNA doublehelical octamers in space groups P61 and P4(3)2(1)2, respectively, and are stable at room temperature. The central two G.T mispairs of (I) adopt the wobble geometry as observed in other G.T mismatches. The two structures differ significantly in their local conformational features at the central helical regions as well as in some global ones. In particular, T-G adopts a large helical twist (44 degrees) whereas C-G adopts a small one (24 degrees). This difference can be rationalized on the basis of simple geometrical considerations. Base-pair stacking energies which were calculated for the two duplexes indicate that (I) is destabilized with respect to (II). Helix-coil transition measurements were performed for each of the three oligomers by means of ultraviolet absorbance spectrophotometry. The results indicate that the stability of the duplexes and the co-operativity of the transition are in the following order: (I) less than (III) less than (II). Such studies may help in understanding why certain regions of DNA are more likely to undergo spontaneous mutations than others.
合成了错配双链体d(GGGTGCCC)(I)及其两个沃森-克里克类似物dGGGCGCCC(II)和d(GGGTACCC)(III)。以2.5 Å和1.7 Å(1 Å = 0.1 nm)的分辨率测定了(I)和(II)的X射线晶体结构,分别精修至R因子为15%和16%。(I)和(II)分别以A-DNA双螺旋八聚体形式在空间群P61和P4(3)2(1)2中结晶,且在室温下稳定。(I)的中间两个G.T错配采用了在其他G.T错配中观察到的摆动几何结构。这两种结构在中心螺旋区域的局部构象特征以及一些整体特征上有显著差异。特别是,T-G采用了较大的螺旋扭转(44度),而C-G采用了较小的螺旋扭转(24度)。这种差异可以基于简单的几何考虑来解释。为这两种双链体计算的碱基对堆积能表明,(I)相对于(II)是不稳定的。通过紫外吸收分光光度法对三种寡聚物分别进行了螺旋-卷曲转变测量。结果表明,双链体的稳定性和转变的协同性按以下顺序排列:(I)<(III)<(II)。此类研究可能有助于理解为什么DNA的某些区域比其他区域更易发生自发突变。