Kawata Eri, Siew Dou-Anne, Payne James Gordon, Louzada Martha, Kovacs Michael J, Lazo-Langner Alejandro
Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Thromb Res. 2021 Jun;202:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
Clinical manifestations and optimal management strategies in patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) are not well characterized.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all newly diagnosed SVT evaluated between January 2007 and December 2018. Efficacy outcome was thrombosis resolution, and safety outcomes included death and occurrence of bleeding.
We included 155 patients with a mean age of 56.2 (18-87). Local risk factors were present in 118 (76.1%) patients and 30 (19.4%) had only systemic/thrombophilia. Local risk factors included abdominal cancers (31%), surgery (20.6%) and liver cirrhosis (19.4%). Thrombophilia screening was conducted in approximately 50% of patients. Factor V Leiden or Prothrombin G20210A mutations were observed in 7.1% of patients whereas 14.4% were JAK2V617F mutation positive. Most common manifestations at onset were abdominal pain (56.1%), whereas 44.6% were incidentally found. Portal vein thrombosis was observed more in primary cases (91.9% vs. 69.5%, p = 0.012). Anticoagulation was used in 93.5% cases. Indefinite anticoagulation was used more frequently in primary SVT (62.2% vs. 41.5%, p = 0.045). Thrombosis resolution and bleeding complications among primary (without local risk factors) and secondary (with local risk factors) SVT were observed in 48.5%, 65%, 8.1%, and 11.9%, respectively with no difference when comparing patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin and/or low molecular weight heparin (58% vs. 62%, p = 0.326, 9% vs. 12%, p = 0.518).
In this cohort anticoagulation resulted in partial or complete thrombosis resolution in a significant proportion of patients with an acceptable bleeding risk regardless local risk factors or type of anticoagulant.
内脏静脉血栓形成(SVT)患者的临床表现和最佳管理策略尚未得到充分描述。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2007年1月至2018年12月期间评估的所有新诊断的SVT患者。疗效结局为血栓溶解,安全结局包括死亡和出血的发生。
我们纳入了155例患者,平均年龄为56.2岁(18 - 87岁)。118例(76.1%)患者存在局部危险因素,30例(19.4%)仅有全身/血栓形成倾向。局部危险因素包括腹部癌症(31%)、手术(20.6%)和肝硬化(19.4%)。约50%的患者进行了血栓形成倾向筛查。7.1%的患者观察到因子V莱顿或凝血酶原G20210A突变,而14.4%的患者JAK2V617F突变呈阳性。发病时最常见的表现是腹痛(56.1%),而44.6%是偶然发现的。门静脉血栓形成在原发性病例中更常见(91.9%对69.5%,p = 0.012)。93.5%的病例使用了抗凝治疗。原发性SVT更频繁地使用长期抗凝治疗(62.2%对41.5%,p = 0.045)。原发性(无局部危险因素)和继发性(有局部危险因素)SVT的血栓溶解和出血并发症分别为48.5%、65%、8.1%和11.9%,比较直接口服抗凝剂或华法林和/或低分子肝素治疗的患者时无差异(58%对62%,p = 0.326,9%对12%,p = 0.518)。
在该队列中,无论局部危险因素或抗凝剂类型如何,抗凝治疗在相当比例的患者中导致了部分或完全血栓溶解,且出血风险可接受。