Weerasuriya Chathika Krishan, Harris Rebecca Claire, Quaife Matthew, McQuaid Christopher Finn, White Richard G, Gomez Gabriela B
TB Modelling Group, TB Centre and Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
COVID-19 Medical Franchise, Sanofi Pasteur, Singapore 189767, Singapore.
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Mar 11;9(3):245. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9030245.
New tuberculosis vaccines have made substantial progress in the development pipeline. Previous modelling suggests that adolescent/adult mass vaccination may cost-effectively contribute towards achieving global tuberculosis control goals. These analyses have not considered the budgetary feasibility of vaccine programmes. We estimate the maximum total cost that the public health sectors in India and China should expect to pay to introduce a M72/AS01-like vaccine deemed cost-effective at country-specific willingness to pay thresholds for cost-effectiveness. To estimate the total disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted by the vaccination programme, we simulated a 50% efficacy vaccine providing 10-years of protection in post-infection populations between 2027 and 2050 in India and China using a dynamic transmission model of . We investigated two mass vaccination strategies, both delivered every 10-years achieving 70% coverage: Vaccinating adults and adolescents (age ≥10y), or only the most efficient 10-year age subgroup (defined as greatest DALYs averted per vaccine given). We used country-specific thresholds for cost-effectiveness to estimate the maximum total cost (C) a government should be willing to pay for each vaccination strategy. Adult/adolescent vaccination resulted in a C of $21 billion (uncertainty interval [UI]: 16-27) in India, and $15B (UI:12-29) in China at willingness to pay thresholds of $264/DALY averted and $3650/DALY averted, respectively. Vaccinating the highest efficiency age group (India: 50-59y; China: 60-69y) resulted in a C of $5B (UI:4-6) in India and $6B (UI:4-7) in China. Mass vaccination against tuberculosis of all adults and adolescents, deemed cost-effective, will likely impose a substantial budgetary burden. Targeted tuberculosis vaccination, deemed cost-effective, may represent a more affordable approach.
新型结核病疫苗在研发进程中取得了重大进展。先前的模型分析表明,对青少年/成年人进行大规模疫苗接种可能在成本效益方面有助于实现全球结核病控制目标。但这些分析并未考虑疫苗计划的预算可行性。我们估算了印度和中国公共卫生部门为引入一种在各国特定的成本效益支付意愿阈值下被视为具有成本效益的M72/AS01类疫苗预计应支付的最高总成本。为了估算疫苗接种计划避免的伤残调整生命年(DALY)总数,我们使用一个动态传播模型模拟了一种在2027年至2050年间对印度和中国感染后人群提供10年保护、效力为50%的疫苗。我们研究了两种大规模疫苗接种策略,均每10年进行一次接种,覆盖率达到70%:为成年人和青少年(年龄≥10岁)接种,或仅为最有效的10岁年龄亚组(定义为每接种一剂疫苗避免的DALY数最多)接种。我们使用各国特定的成本效益阈值来估算政府为每种疫苗接种策略愿意支付的最高总成本(C)。在印度,按照每避免一个DALY分别支付264美元和在中国按照每避免一个DALY支付3650美元的支付意愿阈值,对成年人/青少年进行疫苗接种在印度产生的最高总成本为210亿美元(不确定区间[UI]:160亿 - 270亿美元),在中国为150亿美元(UI:120亿 - 290亿美元)。为最高效率年龄组(印度:50 - 59岁;中国:60 - 69岁)接种在印度产生的最高总成本为50亿美元(UI:40亿 - 60亿美元),在中国为60亿美元(UI:40亿 - 70亿美元)。对所有成年人和青少年进行结核病大规模疫苗接种虽被视为具有成本效益,但可能会带来巨大的预算负担。而针对性的结核病疫苗接种虽也被视为具有成本效益,但可能是一种更经济实惠的方法。