Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Graduate Restorative, School of dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 8;18(5):2722. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052722.
Dental laboratories (LABs) are integral to the performance of a dentist in providing successful oral rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to compare the adaptation, contour, contacts, and shade matching of different government and commercial dental LABs in the fabrication of porcelain fused to metal (PFM) crowns. Thirty-two dental LABs were selected to fabricate PFM crowns (one PFM crown each). Marginal adaptation, contour, proximal contacts, and shade matching were evaluated. Evaluation of the crowns' quality was performed following modified USPHS/FDI criteria. Visual and colorimeter assessments were employed to evaluate shade matching. Differences between groups were examined by Pearson's Chi-square and Fisher's exact test. The quality of marginal adaptation of crowns was good in 81.25%, however the quality of contours, contacts, and shade matching was compromised in 43.75%, 59.38%, and 39% of all LABs, respectively. Visual and colorimeter shade matching was acceptable in 62.5% and 80% of LABs in the cervical third and middle third regions of crowns, respectively, however in the incisal third the shade matching was unacceptable in nearly 60% of LABs. Commercial laboratories showed significantly better contours and shade matching, but not marginal adaptation. However, no significant differences were found in comparison of proximal contacts between the groups.
牙科实验室(LAB)是牙医成功进行口腔修复的重要组成部分。本研究旨在比较不同政府和商业牙科 LAB 制作金属烤瓷冠(PFM)时的适应性、轮廓、邻接和颜色匹配。选择了 32 个牙科 LAB 来制作 PFM 冠(每个 LAB 制作一个 PFM 冠)。评估了边缘适应性、轮廓、邻接和颜色匹配。根据美国牙科学会/国际牙科联合会(USPHS/FDI)的改良标准评估了牙冠的质量。采用视觉和比色仪评估了颜色匹配。采用 Pearson's Chi-square 和 Fisher's exact 检验比较了组间差异。牙冠边缘适应性的质量在 81.25%的情况下良好,但轮廓、邻接和颜色匹配的质量在 43.75%、59.38%和 39%的 LAB 中受到影响。牙冠颈部第三和中部第三区域的视觉和比色仪颜色匹配分别在 62.5%和 80%的 LAB 中可接受,但在切端区域,近 60%的 LAB 颜色匹配不可接受。商业实验室的轮廓和颜色匹配明显更好,但边缘适应性较差。然而,在比较邻接时,两组之间没有发现显著差异。