• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能在脑膜炎鉴别诊断中的应用:一项全国性研究。

Artificial Intelligence in Differential Diagnostics of Meningitis: A Nationwide Study.

作者信息

Mentis Alexios-Fotios A, Garcia Irene, Jiménez Juan, Paparoupa Maria, Xirogianni Athanasia, Papandreou Anastasia, Tzanakaki Georgina

机构信息

National Meningitis Reference Laboratory, Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of West Attica, 122 43 Athens, Greece.

Department of Mathematical Sciences and Informatics, and Health Research Institute (IdISBa), University of the Balearic Islands (UIB), 07122 Palma, Balearic Islands, Spain.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 28;11(4):602. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040602.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics11040602
PMID:33800653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8065596/
Abstract

Differential diagnosis between bacterial and viral meningitis is crucial. In our study, to differentiate bacterial vs. viral meningitis, three machine learning (ML) algorithms (multiple logistic regression (MLR), random forest (RF), and naïve-Bayes (NB)) were applied for the two age groups (0-14 and >14 years) of patients with meningitis by both conventional (culture) and molecular (PCR) methods. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neutrophils, CSF lymphocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), blood albumin, blood C-reactive protein (CRP), glucose, blood soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), and CSF lymphocytes-to-blood CRP ratio (LCR) were used as predictors for the ML algorithms. The performance of the ML algorithms was evaluated through a cross-validation procedure, and optimal predictions of the type of meningitis were above 95% for viral and 78% for bacterial meningitis. Overall, MLR and RF yielded the best performance when using CSF neutrophils, CSF lymphocytes, NLR, albumin, glucose, gender, and CRP. Also, our results reconfirm the high diagnostic accuracy of NLR in the differential diagnosis between bacterial and viral meningitis.

摘要

鉴别细菌性脑膜炎和病毒性脑膜炎至关重要。在我们的研究中,为了区分细菌性脑膜炎和病毒性脑膜炎,通过传统(培养)和分子(PCR)方法,对两个年龄组(0 - 14岁和>14岁)的脑膜炎患者应用了三种机器学习(ML)算法(多元逻辑回归(MLR)、随机森林(RF)和朴素贝叶斯(NB))。脑脊液(CSF)中性粒细胞、CSF淋巴细胞、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血白蛋白、血C反应蛋白(CRP)、葡萄糖、血可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂受体(suPAR)以及CSF淋巴细胞与血CRP比值(LCR)被用作ML算法的预测指标。通过交叉验证程序评估ML算法的性能,对于病毒性脑膜炎,脑膜炎类型的最佳预测准确率高于95%,对于细菌性脑膜炎则为78%。总体而言,当使用CSF中性粒细胞、CSF淋巴细胞、NLR、白蛋白、葡萄糖、性别和CRP时,MLR和RF表现最佳。此外,我们的结果再次证实了NLR在细菌性脑膜炎和病毒性脑膜炎鉴别诊断中的高诊断准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c7/8065596/7203f6b18a47/diagnostics-11-00602-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c7/8065596/7203f6b18a47/diagnostics-11-00602-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c7/8065596/7203f6b18a47/diagnostics-11-00602-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Differential Diagnostics of Meningitis: A Nationwide Study.人工智能在脑膜炎鉴别诊断中的应用:一项全国性研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 28;11(4):602. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040602.
2
The cerebrospinal fluid neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is a sensitive biomarker for bacterial meningitis in children.脑脊液中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值是儿童细菌性脑膜炎的敏感生物标志物。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2022 Jun;38(6):1165-1171. doi: 10.1007/s00381-022-05501-y. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
3
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the differential diagnosis of acute bacterial meningitis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在急性细菌性脑膜炎鉴别诊断中的应用
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Mar;35(3):397-403. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2552-1. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
4
Age-specific application of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in meningitis: a nationwide study.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在脑膜炎中的年龄特异性应用:一项全国性研究。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;36(9):1553-1557. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-2967-y. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
5
The usefulness of hematological parameters and cerebrospinal fluid indexes in the differential diagnosis of acute bacterial from viral meningitis.血液学参数和脑脊液指标在急性细菌性与病毒性脑膜炎鉴别诊断中的作用。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023 Sep;107(1):116005. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.116005. Epub 2023 Jun 11.
6
[The value of C-reactive protein for the differentiation of bacterial meningitis from viral meningitis].[C反应蛋白在鉴别细菌性脑膜炎和病毒性脑膜炎中的价值]
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 1995 Jan-Jun;99(1-2):144-50.
7
NLRP3 in the Cerebrospinal Fluid as a Potential Biomarker for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Community-Acquired Bacterial Meningitis in Adults.脑脊液中 NLRP3 作为成人社区获得性细菌性脑膜炎诊断和预后的潜在生物标志物。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Jan 25;11:803186. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.803186. eCollection 2021.
8
Comparison of C Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin Levels in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum to Differentiate Bacterial from Viral Meningitis.比较脑脊液和血清中C反应蛋白及降钙素原水平以鉴别细菌性脑膜炎和病毒性脑膜炎
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2018 Jul;48(4):506-510.
9
[Differential diagnosis of bacterial and viral meningitis in childhood acute meningitis: a statistical model].[儿童急性脑膜炎中细菌性和病毒性脑膜炎的鉴别诊断:一种统计模型]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2007 Jan;41(1):63-9.
10
Is Cerebrospinal Fluid C-reactive Protein a Better Tool than Blood C-reactive Protein in Laboratory Diagnosis of Meningitis in Children?在儿童脑膜炎的实验室诊断中,脑脊液C反应蛋白比血液C反应蛋白是更好的工具吗?
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2013 Feb;13(1):93-9. doi: 10.12816/0003201. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A Machine Learning Approach for Identifying People With Neuroinfectious Diseases in Electronic Health Records: Algorithm Development and Validation.一种用于在电子健康记录中识别神经感染性疾病患者的机器学习方法:算法开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Aug 29;13:e63157. doi: 10.2196/63157.
2
Improving meningitis surveillance and diagnosis with machine learning: Insights from São Paulo.利用机器学习改善脑膜炎监测与诊断:来自圣保罗的见解。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jul 10;4(7):e0000925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000925. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Diagnostic prediction models for bacterial meningitis in children with a suspected central nervous system infection: a systematic review and prospective validation study.

本文引用的文献

1
Disease severity-specific neutrophil signatures in blood transcriptomes stratify COVID-19 patients.血液转录组中疾病严重程度特异性中性粒细胞特征可对 COVID-19 患者进行分层。
Genome Med. 2021 Jan 13;13(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13073-020-00823-5.
2
Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and cancer prognosis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与癌症预后:观察性研究系统评价和荟萃分析的伞状评价。
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 20;18(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01817-1.
3
Probing infectious disease by single-cell RNA sequencing: Progresses and perspectives.
疑似中枢神经系统感染儿童细菌性脑膜炎的诊断预测模型:一项系统评价和前瞻性验证研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 7;14(8):e081172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081172.
4
Harnessing of Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Infections: A Systematic Review.利用人工智能诊断和预防医院获得性感染:一项系统综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;14(5):484. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14050484.
5
The effect of machine learning algorithms in the prediction, and diagnosis of meningitis: A systematic review.机器学习算法在脑膜炎预测和诊断中的作用:一项系统综述。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 14;7(2):e1893. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1893. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Applications of artificial intelligence in the field of oral and maxillofacial pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.人工智能在口腔颌面病理学领域的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03533-7.
7
Second Opinion for Non-Surgical Root Canal Treatment Prognosis Using Machine Learning Models.使用机器学习模型对非手术根管治疗预后的二次评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 23;13(17):2742. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172742.
8
A diagnostic model based on routine blood examination for serious bacterial infections in neonates-a cross-sectional study.基于常规血液检查的新生儿严重细菌感染诊断模型:一项横断面研究。
Epidemiol Infect. 2023 Jul 31;151:e137. doi: 10.1017/S0950268823001231.
9
Applications of artificial intelligence-machine learning for detection of stress: a critical overview.人工智能-机器学习在压力检测中的应用:批判性综述。
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;29(6):1882-1894. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02047-6. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
10
Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience towards the Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders-A Scoping Review.人工智能与神经科学在神经紊乱诊断中的交汇:综述
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 13;23(6):3062. doi: 10.3390/s23063062.
通过单细胞RNA测序探究传染病:进展与展望
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020;18:2962-2971. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.10.016. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI Extension.涉及人工智能干预的临床试验方案指南:SPIRIT-AI 扩展。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 9;370:m3210. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3210.
5
Machine Learning To Predict Serious Bacterial Infections in Young Febrile Infants.机器学习预测婴幼儿发热时严重细菌感染
Pediatrics. 2020 Sep;146(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-4096.
6
Blood transcriptomic discrimination of bacterial and viral infections in the emergency department: a multi-cohort observational validation study.急诊科血液转录组学区分细菌和病毒感染:一项多队列观察性验证研究。
BMC Med. 2020 Jul 21;18(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01653-3.
7
Impact of cerebrospinal fluid syndromic testing in the management of children with suspected central nervous system infection.脑脊液综合征检测在疑似中枢神经系统感染患儿管理中的影响。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;39(12):2379-2386. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03986-6. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
8
Lymphocyte-to-C-Reactive Protein Ratio: A Novel Predictor of Adverse Outcomes in COVID-19.淋巴细胞与C反应蛋白比值:COVID-19不良结局的新型预测指标
J Clin Med Res. 2020 Jul;12(7):415-422. doi: 10.14740/jocmr4227. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
9
Machine Learning Takes Laboratory Automation to the Next Level.机器学习将实验室自动化提升到新的水平。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Mar 25;58(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00012-20.
10
Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction.比较不同的监督机器学习算法在疾病预测中的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-1004-8.