Cossio-Bolaños Marco, Vidal-Espinoza Rubén, Castelli Correia de Campos Luis Felipe, Urzua-Alul Luis, Fuentes-López José Damián, Sulla-Torres Jose, Andruske Cynthia Lee, Gomez-Campos Rossana
Universidad Católica del Maule, Avenida San Miguel 3605, 3466706 Talca, Chile.
Universidad Católica Silva Henriquez, Gral. Jofré 462, 8330225 Santiago, Chile.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 2;9(3):264. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030264.
(1) Background: Spirometry is useful for diagnosing and monitoring many respiratory diseases. The objectives were: (a) compare maximum expiratory flow (MEF) values with those from international studies, (b) determine if MEF should be evaluated by chronological age and/or maturity, (c) develop reference norms for children, and adolescents. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional study was designed with 3900 subjects ages 6.0 and 17.9 years old. Weight, standing height, sitting height, and MEF were measured. Length of the lower limbs, body mass index (BMI), and age of peak height velocity growth (APHV) were calculated. (3) Results: Values for the curves (p50) for females of all ages from Spain and Italy were higher (92 to 382 (L/min)) than those for females from Arequipa (Peru). Curve values for males from Spain and Italy were greater [70 to 125 (L/min)] than the males studied. MEF values were similar to those of Chilean students ages 6 to 11. However, from 12 to 17 years old, values were lower in males (25 to 55 (L/min)) and in females (23.5 to 90 (L/min)). Correlations between chronological age and MEF in males were from (r = 0.68, R = 0.39) and in females from (r = 0.46, R = 0.21). Correlations between maturity (APHV) and MEF for males were from (r = 0.66, R = 0.44) and for females (r = 0.51, R = 0.26). Percentiles were calculated for chronological age and APHV. Conclusion: Differences occurred in MEF when compared with other geographical regions of the world. We determined that maturity may be a more effective indicator for analyzing MEF. Reference values were generated using chronological age and maturity.
(1) 背景:肺量计对于诊断和监测多种呼吸系统疾病很有用。目标如下:(a) 将最大呼气流量 (MEF) 值与国际研究中的值进行比较,(b) 确定是否应按实际年龄和/或成熟度来评估 MEF,(c) 制定儿童和青少年的参考标准。(2) 方法:设计了一项横断面研究,研究对象为 3900 名年龄在 6.0 至 17.9 岁之间的受试者。测量了体重、站立身高、坐高和 MEF。计算了下肢长度、体重指数 (BMI) 和身高增长高峰年龄 (APHV)。(3) 结果:来自西班牙和意大利的所有年龄段女性的曲线值 (p50) 高于来自阿雷基帕(秘鲁)的女性 [92 至 382(升/分钟)]。来自西班牙和意大利的男性曲线值 [70 至 125(升/分钟)] 高于所研究的男性。MEF 值与 6 至 11 岁智利学生的相似。然而,12 至 17 岁时,男性(25 至 55(升/分钟))和女性(23.5 至 90(升/分钟))的值较低。男性实际年龄与 MEF 之间的相关性为 (r = 0.68, R = 0.39),女性为 (r = 0.46, R = 0.21)。男性成熟度(APHV)与 MEF 之间的相关性为 (r = 0.66, R = 0.44),女性为 (r = 0.51, R = 0.26)。计算了实际年龄和 APHV 的百分位数。结论:与世界其他地理区域相比,MEF 存在差异。我们确定成熟度可能是分析 MEF 更有效的指标。使用实际年龄和成熟度生成了参考值。