Pajor Anna
Department of Mathematics, Cracow University of Economics, ul. Rakowicka 27, 31-510 Kraków, Poland.
Department of Financial Mathematics, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, ul. Prof. Stanisława Łojasiewicza 6, 30-348 Kraków, Poland.
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Mar 27;23(4):399. doi: 10.3390/e23040399.
Formal Bayesian comparison of two competing models, based on the posterior odds ratio, amounts to estimation of the Bayes factor, which is equal to the ratio of respective two marginal data density values. In models with a large number of parameters and/or latent variables, they are expressed by high-dimensional integrals, which are often computationally infeasible. Therefore, other methods of evaluation of the Bayes factor are needed. In this paper, a new method of estimation of the Bayes factor is proposed. Simulation examples confirm good performance of the proposed estimators. Finally, these new estimators are used to formally compare different hybrid Multivariate Stochastic Volatility-Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (MSV-MGARCH) models which have a large number of latent variables. The empirical results show, among other things, that the validity of reduction of the hybrid MSV-MGARCH model to the MGARCH specification depends on the analyzed data set as well as on prior assumptions about model parameters.
基于后验概率比的两个竞争模型的形式贝叶斯比较,等同于对贝叶斯因子的估计,贝叶斯因子等于各自两个边际数据密度值的比率。在具有大量参数和/或潜在变量的模型中,它们由高维积分表示,而这些积分在计算上通常是不可行的。因此,需要其他评估贝叶斯因子的方法。本文提出了一种估计贝叶斯因子的新方法。模拟示例证实了所提出估计量的良好性能。最后,这些新的估计量被用于正式比较具有大量潜在变量的不同混合多元随机波动率 - 多元广义自回归条件异方差(MSV - MGARCH)模型。实证结果表明,除其他外,混合MSV - MGARCH模型简化为MGARCH规范的有效性取决于所分析的数据集以及关于模型参数的先验假设。