• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无症状人群中心血管风险评分与亚临床动脉粥样硬化若干标志物之间的关系

The Relationship between Cardiovascular Risk Scores and Several Markers of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in an Asymptomatic Population.

作者信息

Mitu Ovidiu, Crisan Adrian, Redwood Simon, Cazacu-Davidescu Ioan-Elian, Mitu Ivona, Costache Irina-Iuliana, Onofrei Viviana, Miftode Radu-Stefan, Costache Alexandru-Dan, Haba Cristian Mihai Stefan, Mitu Florin

机构信息

1st Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.

Department of Cardiology, Clinical Emergency Hospital "Sf. Spiridon", 700111 Iasi, Romania.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 1;10(5):955. doi: 10.3390/jcm10050955.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10050955
PMID:33804436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7957548/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current cardiovascular disease (CVD) primary prevention guidelines prioritize risk stratification by using clinical risk scores. However, subclinical atherosclerosis may rest long term undetected. This study aimed to evaluate multiple subclinical atherosclerosis parameters in relation to several CV risk scores in asymptomatic individuals.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, single-center study included 120 asymptomatic CVD subjects. Four CVD risk scores were computed: SCORE, Framingham, QRISK, and PROCAM. Subclinical atherosclerosis has been determined by carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), pulse wave velocity (PWV), aortic and brachial augmentation indexes (AIXAo, respectively AIXbr), aortic systolic blood pressure (SBPao), and ankle-brachial index (ABI).

RESULTS

The mean age was 52.01 ± 10.73 years. For cIMT-SCORE was more sensitive; for PWV-Framingham score was more sensitive; for AIXbr-QRISK and PROCAM were more sensitive while for AIXao-QRISK presented better results. As for SBPao-SCORE presented more sensitive results. However, ABI did not correlate with any CVD risk score.

CONCLUSIONS

All four CV risk scores are associated with markers of subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic population, except for ABI, with specific particularities for each CVD risk score. Moreover, we propose specific cut-off values of CV risk scores that may indicate the need for subclinical atherosclerosis assessment.

摘要

背景

当前心血管疾病(CVD)一级预防指南通过使用临床风险评分对风险分层进行优先排序。然而,亚临床动脉粥样硬化可能长期未被发现。本研究旨在评估无症状个体中多个亚临床动脉粥样硬化参数与几种心血管风险评分之间的关系。

方法

一项横断面单中心研究纳入了120例无症状CVD受试者。计算了四种CVD风险评分:SCORE、弗雷明汉姆评分、QRISK和PROCAM。通过颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT)、脉搏波速度(PWV)、主动脉和肱动脉增强指数(分别为AIXAo和AIXbr)、主动脉收缩压(SBPao)和踝臂指数(ABI)来确定亚临床动脉粥样硬化。

结果

平均年龄为52.01±10.73岁。对于cIMT,SCORE更敏感;对于PWV,弗雷明汉姆评分更敏感;对于AIXbr,QRISK和PROCAM更敏感,而对于AIXao,QRISK表现出更好的结果。至于SBPao,SCORE呈现出更敏感的结果。然而,ABI与任何CVD风险评分均无相关性。

结论

除ABI外,所有四种心血管风险评分均与无症状人群中亚临床动脉粥样硬化标志物相关,每种CVD风险评分都有其特定的特点。此外,我们提出了心血管风险评分的特定临界值,这些临界值可能表明需要进行亚临床动脉粥样硬化评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd4/7957548/379e6057315a/jcm-10-00955-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd4/7957548/379e6057315a/jcm-10-00955-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd4/7957548/379e6057315a/jcm-10-00955-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Relationship between Cardiovascular Risk Scores and Several Markers of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in an Asymptomatic Population.无症状人群中心血管风险评分与亚临床动脉粥样硬化若干标志物之间的关系
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 1;10(5):955. doi: 10.3390/jcm10050955.
2
Subclinical cardiovascular disease assessment and its relationship with cardiovascular risk SCORE in a healthy adult population: A cross-sectional community-based study.健康成年人群中亚临床心血管疾病评估及其与心血管风险评分(SCORE)的关系:一项基于社区的横断面研究。
Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2017 May-Jun;29(3):111-119. doi: 10.1016/j.arteri.2016.10.004. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
3
The comparison of cardiovascular disease risk prediction scores and evaluation of subclinical atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.类风湿关节炎患者心血管疾病风险预测评分的比较及亚临床动脉粥样硬化的评估:一项横断面研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Dec;41(12):3675-3686. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06349-y. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
4
Subclinical atherosclerosis, cardiovascular health, and disease risk: is there a case for the Cardiovascular Health Index in the primary prevention population?亚临床动脉粥样硬化、心血管健康与疾病风险:心血管健康指数是否适用于一级预防人群?
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5263-6.
5
Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and subclinical atherosclerosis: a cross-sectional study on population over 40 years old.非酒精性脂肪性肝病与亚临床动脉粥样硬化之间的关联:一项针对40岁以上人群的横断面研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Jul 16;18(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0877-2.
6
Cardiovascular Risk in Myositis Patients Compared to the General Population: Preliminary Data From a Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.与普通人群相比,肌炎患者的心血管风险:一项单中心横断面研究的初步数据。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 3;9:861419. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.861419. eCollection 2022.
7
Gender, subclinical organ damage and cardiovascular risk stratification in hypertensive patients.性别、亚临床器官损伤与高血压患者心血管风险分层。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Feb;35(2):367-374. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1527304. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
8
Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Using Ultrasonographic Surrogate Markers of Atherosclerosis and Arterial Stiffness in Patients With Chronic Renal Impairment: A Narrative Review of the Evidence and a Critical View of Their Utility in Clinical Practice.使用超声替代标志物评估慢性肾功能损害患者的动脉粥样硬化和动脉僵硬度的心血管风险:证据的叙述性综述及其在临床实践中的效用批判性观点
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 Sep 10;7:2054358120954939. doi: 10.1177/2054358120954939. eCollection 2020.
9
The synergistic impact of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome on subclinical atherosclerosis.非酒精性脂肪性肝病与代谢综合征对亚临床动脉粥样硬化的协同影响。
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2016 Feb;84(2):203-209. doi: 10.1111/cen.12940. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
10
Carotid plaque burden as a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis: comparison with other tests for subclinical arterial disease in the High Risk Plaque BioImage study.颈动脉斑块负荷作为亚临床动脉粥样硬化的衡量指标:在高危斑块生物图像研究中与其他亚临床动脉疾病检测方法的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jul;5(7):681-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship Between Oxidative Stress and Cardiovascular Risk in Adolescents in Montenegro.黑山青少年氧化应激与心血管风险之间的关系。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Aug 7;26(15):7650. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157650.
2
Biochemical markers and carotid intima-media thickness in relation to cardiovascular risk in young women.生化标志物与颈动脉内膜中层厚度与年轻女性心血管风险的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 21;14(1):24776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75409-x.
3
Impact of Classical Risk Factors on Subclinical Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression: Insights from a Non-Diabetic Cohort.

本文引用的文献

1
Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Progression as Surrogate Marker for Cardiovascular Risk: Meta-Analysis of 119 Clinical Trials Involving 100 667 Patients.颈动脉内中膜厚度进展作为心血管风险的替代标志物:涉及 100667 名患者的 119 项临床试验的荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Aug 18;142(7):621-642. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046361. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Advanced carotid atherosclerosis in middle-aged subjects: comparison with PROCAM and SCORE risk categories, the potential for reclassification and cost-efficiency of carotid ultrasound in the setting of primary care.中年人群中的颈动脉粥样硬化:与 PROCAM 和 SCORE 风险分类的比较,在初级保健环境中颈动脉超声的重新分类潜力和成本效益。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2019 Jul 24;149:w20006. doi: 10.4414/smw.2019.20006. eCollection 2019 Jul 15.
3
经典危险因素对亚临床颈动脉粥样硬化进展的影响:来自非糖尿病队列的见解
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 12;25(3):103. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2503103. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Predictability of Cardiovascular Risk Scores for Carotid Atherosclerosis in Community-Dwelling Middle-Aged and Elderly Adults.社区中老年成年人颈动脉粥样硬化心血管风险评分的可预测性
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 26;13(9):2563. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092563.
5
Cardiovascular disease in Alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency: an observational study assessing the role of neutrophil proteinase activity and the suitability of validated screening tools.α1 抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症的心血管疾病:一项观察性研究,评估中性粒细胞蛋白酶活性的作用和经过验证的筛选工具的适用性。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Mar 21;19(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03124-x.
6
Chronic Kidney Disease Associated with Ischemic Heart Disease: To What Extent Do Biomarkers Help?与缺血性心脏病相关的慢性肾脏病:生物标志物有多大帮助?
Life (Basel). 2023 Dec 25;14(1):34. doi: 10.3390/life14010034.
7
Pulse Wave Velocity of 8.2 m/s as a Threshold Associated with Cardiovascular Target Organ Damage Presence.8.2m/s 的脉搏波速度作为心血管靶器官损害存在的阈值。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Oct;120(10):e20220934. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220934.
8
Syndecan-1: From a Promising Novel Cardiac Biomarker to a Surrogate Early Predictor of Kidney and Liver Injury in Patients with Acute Heart Failure.Syndecan-1:从一个有前景的新型心脏生物标志物到急性心力衰竭患者肾脏和肝脏损伤的替代早期预测指标。
Life (Basel). 2023 Mar 28;13(4):898. doi: 10.3390/life13040898.
9
Generic and disease-adapted cardiovascular risk scores as predictors of atherosclerosis progression in SLE.通用型和疾病适应型心血管风险评分作为 SLE 患者动脉粥样硬化进展的预测指标。
Lupus Sci Med. 2023 Mar;10(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000864.
10
The metabolic phenotype of the patient influences the reduction in carotid intima-media thickness achieved following metabolic surgery.患者的代谢表型会影响代谢手术后颈动脉内膜中层厚度的降低。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Nov;50(11):3000605221137475. doi: 10.1177/03000605221137475.
Association between carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and overall cardiovascular risk score assessed by the SCORE system in urban Polish population.颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度与 SCORE 系统评估的城市波兰人群总体心血管风险评分的相关性。
Kardiol Pol. 2019;77(3):363-370. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2019.0028. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
4
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
5
Arterial Stiffness: A Prognostic Marker in Coronary Heart Disease. Available Methods and Clinical Application.动脉僵硬:冠心病的一种预后标志物。现有方法及临床应用
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Jun 11;5:64. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00064. eCollection 2018.
6
Subclinical atherosclerosis, cardiovascular health, and disease risk: is there a case for the Cardiovascular Health Index in the primary prevention population?亚临床动脉粥样硬化、心血管健康与疾病风险:心血管健康指数是否适用于一级预防人群?
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5263-6.
7
Development and validation of QRISK3 risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study.用于估计心血管疾病未来风险的QRISK3风险预测算法的开发与验证:前瞻性队列研究
BMJ. 2017 May 23;357:j2099. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2099.
8
Relationship between Framingham risk score and subclinical atherosclerosis in carotid plaques: an in vivo study using multi-contrast MRI.弗明汉风险评分与颈动脉斑块内亚临床动脉粥样硬化的关系:使用多对比 MRI 的体内研究。
Sci China Life Sci. 2017 Jan;60(1):23-27. doi: 10.1007/s11427-016-0385-5. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
9
Statin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.他汀类药物用于成人心血管疾病的一级预防:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明
JAMA. 2016 Nov 15;316(19):1997-2007. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15450.
10
2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR).2016年欧洲临床实践心血管疾病预防指南:欧洲心脏病学会和其他学会关于临床实践心血管疾病预防的第六联合工作组(由10个学会的代表和特邀专家组成)由欧洲心血管预防与康复协会(EACPR)特别贡献制定。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 1;37(29):2315-2381. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106. Epub 2016 May 23.