Lim Ming D, Birney Damian P
School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
J Intell. 2021 Mar 1;9(1):12. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9010012.
Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to a set of competencies to process, understand, and reason with affective information. Recent studies suggest ability measures of experiential and strategic EI differentially predict performance on non-emotional and emotionally laden tasks. To explore cognitive processes underlying these abilities further, we varied the affective context of a traditional letter-based -back working-memory task. In study 1, participants completed 0-, 2-, and 3-back tasks with flanking distractors that were either emotional (fearful or happy faces) or non-emotional (shapes or letters stimuli). Strategic EI, but not experiential EI, significantly influenced participants' accuracy across all -back levels, irrespective of flanker type. In Study 2, participants completed 1-, 2-, and 3-back levels. Experiential EI was positively associated with response times for emotional flankers at the 1-back level but not other levels or flanker types, suggesting those higher in experiential EI reacted slower on low-load trials with affective context. In Study 3, flankers were asynchronously presented either 300 ms or 1000 ms before probes. Results mirrored Study 1 for accuracy rates and Study 2 for response times. Our findings (a) provide experimental evidence for the distinctness of experiential and strategic EI and (b) suggest that each are related to different aspects of cognitive processes underlying working memory.
情商(EI)是指一套处理、理解情感信息并据此进行推理的能力。最近的研究表明,体验型和策略型情商的能力测量在预测非情感任务和情感负载任务的表现上存在差异。为了进一步探究这些能力背后的认知过程,我们改变了传统基于字母的反向工作记忆任务的情感背景。在研究1中,参与者完成了0-、2-和3-回溯任务,侧翼干扰物为情感性的(恐惧或开心的面孔)或非情感性的(形状或字母刺激)。策略型情商而非体验型情商,在所有回溯水平上都显著影响了参与者的准确率,与侧翼干扰物类型无关。在研究2中,参与者完成了1-、2-和3-回溯水平的任务。体验型情商与1-回溯水平下情感侧翼干扰物的反应时间呈正相关,但在其他水平或侧翼干扰物类型下并非如此,这表明体验型情商较高的人在有情感背景的低负荷试验中反应较慢。在研究3中,侧翼干扰物在探测之前分别提前300毫秒或1000毫秒异步呈现。结果在准确率方面与研究1相似,在反应时间方面与研究2相似。我们的研究结果(a)为体验型和策略型情商的差异性提供了实验证据,(b)表明它们各自与工作记忆背后认知过程的不同方面相关。