School of Marxism, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Research Center for Educational Neuroscience, School of Educational Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 25;18(7):3400. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073400.
This study aims to translate and validate two perceived suicide stigma scales, including the Stigma of Suicide Attempt Scale (STOSA) and the Stigma of Suicide and Suicide Survivor Scale (STOSASS) into Chinese language, examining the factor structure, and assessing the correlation between suicide stigma and a series of variables. After translating and back translating the STOSA and STOSASS, an online survey was administrated to 412 college students in China. These two scales were tested for their dimensionality in a series of confirmatory factor analyses. A series of regression analyses were conducted to examine the factors that are associated with perceived and public suicide stigma, including demographics, psychological distress, suicidality, suicide exposure, and perceived entitativity of suicide ideators, decedents, and survivors. The results showed that the two translated scales, STOSA and STOSASS, were reliable (Cronbach's α = 0.79~0.83) and valid in Chinese contexts and it can be treated as unidimensional scales. Suicidality, exposure to suicide, and perceived entitativity of suicide-related persons were significantly associated with higher endorsement of public suicide stigma (SOSS Stigma, < 0.03), but not perceived stigma (STOSA, STOSASS). Higher levels of psychological distress were associated with both higher perceived and public suicide stigma ( < 0.05).
本研究旨在将自杀耻辱感量表(STOSA)和自杀与自杀幸存者耻辱感量表(STOSASS)翻译成中文,并检验其结构效度,评估自杀耻辱感与一系列变量之间的相关性。在对 STOSA 和 STOSASS 进行翻译和回译后,对中国 412 名大学生进行了在线调查。通过一系列验证性因素分析,对这两个量表进行了维度测试。进行了一系列回归分析,以检验与感知和公众自杀耻辱感相关的因素,包括人口统计学因素、心理困扰、自杀意念、自杀暴露和对自杀意念者、自杀身亡者和幸存者的感知实体性。结果表明,这两个翻译量表(STOSA 和 STOSASS)在中国背景下具有可靠性(Cronbach's α = 0.79~0.83)和有效性,可视为单维度量表。自杀意念、自杀暴露和对自杀相关人员的感知实体性与公众自杀耻辱感的更高认可显著相关(SOSS 耻辱感, < 0.03),但与感知耻辱感无关(STOSA,STOSASS)。较高的心理困扰水平与感知和公众自杀耻辱感都呈正相关( < 0.05)。