Child Trends, 7315 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1200W, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 23;18(6):3305. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063305.
This study presents findings from a randomized control trial replication evaluation of Pulse, an app-based pregnancy prevention program implemented with Black and Latinx women aged 18-20, a population with high rates of unplanned pregnancy. We used social media advertisements to enroll 1013 women online across the U.S. and automatically randomized participants to either the Pulse reproductive health app or a general health control app, stratifying by age and race/Latinx ethnicity. Participants received reminder text messages to view the app as well as text messages with app-related content throughout the intervention. Linear probability models were conducted on the analytic sample of 871 participants who completed the six-week survey and 798 who completed the six-month survey and adjusted for permuted block randomization and multiple hypothesis testing. Compared to the control group, intervention group participants had higher contraceptive knowledge ( = 0.000), which replicates findings from an earlier evaluation. However, these impacts were not sustained at six-month follow-up ( = 0.162). We found no other significant program impacts. This contrasts with an earlier evaluation that found intervention participants were less likely to have had sex without a hormonal or long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method and had greater self-confidence to use contraception consistently than the control group. Different demographic characteristics, lower app usage, and more negative attitudes about and usage of hormonal/LARC contraception in the current sample may help to explain fewer impacts than the earlier evaluation.
本研究报告了一项针对 Pulse 的随机对照试验复制评估的结果,Pulse 是一款基于应用程序的怀孕预防计划,针对的是年龄在 18-20 岁的黑人和拉丁裔女性,这些人群的意外怀孕率很高。我们使用社交媒体广告在美国各地招募了 1013 名女性,并通过年龄和种族/拉丁裔进行分层,自动将参与者随机分配到 Pulse 生殖健康应用程序或一般健康对照组。参与者会收到查看应用程序的提醒短信,以及包含应用程序相关内容的短信。在对完成六周调查的 871 名参与者和完成六个月调查的 798 名参与者的分析样本中,采用线性概率模型进行分析,并对随机分组和多重假设检验进行了调整。与对照组相比,干预组参与者的避孕知识更高(=0.000),这复制了早期评估的结果。然而,这些影响在六个月的随访中没有持续(=0.162)。我们没有发现其他显著的项目影响。这与早期评估形成对比,早期评估发现,与对照组相比,干预组参与者在没有激素或长效可逆避孕方法的情况下发生性行为的可能性较低,并且更有信心持续使用避孕措施。当前样本中不同的人口统计学特征、较低的应用程序使用率,以及对激素/LARC 避孕措施的负面态度和使用情况,可能有助于解释为什么当前评估的影响比早期评估小。