Eberhardt Kirsten Alexandra, Dewald Felix, Heger Eva, Gieselmann Lutz, Vanshylla Kanika, Wirtz Maike, Kleipass Franziska, Johannis Wibke, Schommers Philipp, Gruell Henning, Brensing Karl August, Müller Roman-Ulrich, Augustin Max, Lehmann Clara, Koch Manuel, Klein Florian, Di Cristanziano Veronica
Department of Tropical Medicine, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine & I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Microorganisms. 2021 Mar 31;9(4):733. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040733.
: The investigation of the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 represents a key aspect in facing the COVID-19 pandemic. In the present study, we compared the new Immundiagnostik IDK® anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG assay with four widely-used commercial serological assays for the detection of antibodies targeting S (spike) and NC (nucleocapsid) proteins. Serum samples were taken from an unbiased group of convalescent patients and from a negative control group. Sample were simultaneously analyzed by the new Immundiagnostik IDK anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG assay, by the DiaSorin LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG assay, and by the Euroimmun anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG ELISA. Antibodies binding NC were detected by the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and by the pan-immunoglobulin immunoassay Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, we investigated samples of a group of COVID-19 convalescent subjects that were primarily tested S1 IgG non-reactive. Samples were also tested by live virus and pseudovirus neutralization tests. Overall, the IDK® anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG assay showed the highest sensitivity among the evaluated spike (S) protein-based assays. Additionally, the Immundiagnostik assay correlated well with serum-neutralizing activity. The novel IDK anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG assay showed high sensitivity and specificity, representing a valid option for use in the routine diagnostic.
对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗体反应的研究是应对新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)大流行的一个关键方面。在本研究中,我们将新的免疫诊断公司(Immundiagnostik)IDK®抗SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG检测方法与四种广泛使用的商业血清学检测方法进行了比较,以检测针对刺突(S)蛋白和核衣壳(NC)蛋白的抗体。血清样本取自一组无偏倚的康复患者和一个阴性对照组。样本同时通过新的免疫诊断公司IDK抗SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG检测方法、索林集团(DiaSorin)LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG检测方法以及欧蒙(Euroimmun)抗SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)进行分析。通过雅培(Abbott)SARS-CoV-2 IgG检测方法和罗氏(Roche)电化学发光免疫分析法(Elecsys)抗SARS-CoV-2全免疫球蛋白免疫测定法检测结合NC的抗体。此外,我们还对一组最初检测S1 IgG呈非反应性的COVID-19康复受试者的样本进行了研究。样本还通过活病毒和假病毒中和试验进行检测。总体而言,IDK®抗SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG检测方法在评估的基于刺突(S)蛋白的检测方法中显示出最高的灵敏度。此外,免疫诊断检测方法与血清中和活性具有良好的相关性。新型IDK抗SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG检测方法显示出高灵敏度和特异性,是用于常规诊断的一个有效选择。