Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK.
Faculty of Health, School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 5;18(5):2641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052641.
The prevalence of type-2 diabetes (T2D) is increasing, particularly among South Asian (SA) communities. Previous research has highlighted the heterogeneous nature of SA ethnicity and the need to consider culture in SA patients' self-management of T2D. We conducted a critical interpretative synthesis (CIS) which aimed to a) develop a new and comprehensive insight into the psychology which underpins SA patients' T2D self-management behaviours and b) present a conceptual model to inform future T2D interventions. A systematic search of the literature retrieved 19 articles, including 536 participants. These were reviewed using established CIS procedures. Analysis identified seven constructs, from which an overarching synthesizing argument 'Cultural Conflict' was derived. Our findings suggest that patients reconstruct knowledge to manage their psychological, behavioural, and cultural conflicts, impacting decisional conflicts associated with T2D self-management and health professional advice (un)consciously. Those unable to resolve this conflict were more likely to default towards cultural identity, continue to align with cultural preferences rather than health professional guidance, and reduce engagement with self-management. Our synthesis and supporting model promote novel ideas for self-management of T2D care for SA patients. Specifically, health professionals should be trained and supported to explore and mitigate negative health beliefs to enable patients to manage social-cultural influences that impact their self-management behaviours.
2 型糖尿病(T2D)的患病率正在上升,尤其是在南亚(SA)社区。先前的研究强调了 SA 族裔的异质性,以及需要考虑 SA 患者 T2D 自我管理中的文化因素。我们进行了一项批判性解释性综合(CIS)研究,旨在:a)深入了解 SA 患者 T2D 自我管理行为背后的心理学;b)提出一个概念模型,为未来的 T2D 干预措施提供信息。系统地检索文献,共检索到 19 篇文章,包括 536 名参与者。使用既定的 CIS 程序对这些文章进行了回顾。分析确定了七个结构,从中得出了一个总体综合论点“文化冲突”。我们的研究结果表明,患者重构知识以管理他们的心理、行为和文化冲突,这会影响与 T2D 自我管理和健康专业建议相关的决策冲突(无意识地)。那些无法解决这种冲突的人更有可能倾向于文化认同,继续遵循文化偏好而不是健康专业指导,并减少自我管理的参与度。我们的综合分析和支持模型为 SA 患者的 T2D 护理自我管理提供了新颖的想法。具体来说,应该培训和支持健康专业人员,以探讨和减轻负面健康信念,使患者能够管理影响其自我管理行为的社会文化影响。