Miller Megan R, Sorensen Madeleine R, Markle Erin D, Clarkson Taylor C, Knight Ashley L, Savran Michelle J, Foy Brian D
Center for Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1685, USA.
Insects. 2021 Mar 30;12(4):304. doi: 10.3390/insects12040304.
Arbovirus transmission studies are dependent on the ability to estimate the titer of virus transmitted from infectious mosquitoes to a host. There are several methods for estimating virus titer in mosquito saliva, including (1) using forced salivation (FS) whereby the infectious mosquito's proboscis is forced into a capillary tube containing media to collect and test their saliva for virus, and (2) by quantifying virus expectorated into host tissues or into the blood contained in an artificial feeder immediately after blood feeding. We studied FS and bloodmeals to estimate and compare titers of Zika virus and chikungunya virus transmitted by the mosquito vector . Infectious virus and viral genomes of both viruses were detected more often from individual mosquitoes using immersion oil for the FS media compared to fetal bovine serum (FBS) plus glycerol, but the FS media had no influence on virus quantification from positive samples. FS virus titers were equivalent when comparing individuals or groups of mosquitoes that never received a blood meal compared to those that were blood fed immediately prior, showing that blood feeding does not influence FS. This suggested that performing FS on mosquitoes after blood feeding might be an efficient way to estimate virus transmitted during blood feeding. However, detecting virus from the blood remaining in an artificial feeder post-blood feeding was mostly unsuccessful relative to quantifying virus from FS of the post-blood fed mosquitoes. In contrast, immunocompromised mice always became infected after being fed on by Zika-infected mosquitoes, even when no infectious virus was detected in their saliva by FS post-blood feed. Due to this discrepancy, we tested the ingested bloodmeals of individual mosquitoes that fed on artificial blood feeders for virus, and compared these to virus in their saliva harvested from FS and to virus in their bodies. These experiments revealed ~50-100 times higher virus titers in the dissected bloodmeals compared to those detected in the same mosquitoes' saliva, demonstrating how mosquitoes re-ingest much of their saliva during artificial blood feeding, and highlighting a large increase in virus transmission during blood feeding. Both FS and the dissected bloodmeals of artificially blood-fed mosquitoes showed that the quantity of viral RNA expectorated by mosquitoes was 2-5 logs more than the quantity of infectious virus. The results from this study add critical information to understanding and quantifying the transmission of arboviruses.
虫媒病毒传播研究依赖于估计从感染性蚊子传播到宿主的病毒滴度的能力。有几种估计蚊子唾液中病毒滴度的方法,包括:(1)使用强制排唾法(FS),即将感染性蚊子的喙强行插入装有培养基的毛细管中,以收集并检测其唾液中的病毒;(2)通过对吸血后立即咳出到宿主组织或人工饲养器中的血液中的病毒进行定量。我们研究了强制排唾法和血餐来估计和比较蚊媒传播的寨卡病毒和基孔肯雅病毒的滴度。与胎牛血清(FBS)加甘油相比,使用浸油作为强制排唾法培养基时,从单个蚊子中更常检测到两种病毒的感染性病毒和病毒基因组,但强制排唾法培养基对阳性样本的病毒定量没有影响。与那些刚进行过吸血的蚊子个体或群体相比,从未进食血餐的蚊子个体或群体的强制排唾法病毒滴度相当,这表明吸血不影响强制排唾法。这表明在吸血后对蚊子进行强制排唾法可能是估计吸血过程中传播的病毒的有效方法。然而,相对于对吸血后蚊子的强制排唾法进行病毒定量,从人工饲养器中吸血后剩余血液中检测病毒大多不成功。相比之下,免疫功能低下的小鼠在被感染寨卡病毒的蚊子叮咬后总是会被感染,即使在吸血后通过强制排唾法在其唾液中未检测到感染性病毒。由于这种差异,我们检测了以人工饲养器为食的单个蚊子摄入的血餐中的病毒,并将其与从强制排唾法收集的唾液中的病毒以及它们体内的病毒进行比较。这些实验表明,解剖后的血餐中的病毒滴度比在同一蚊子唾液中检测到的病毒滴度高约50 - 100倍,这表明蚊子在人工吸血过程中会重新摄取大量唾液,并突出了吸血过程中病毒传播的大幅增加。人工吸血蚊子的强制排唾法和解剖后的血餐都表明,蚊子咳出的病毒RNA数量比感染性病毒数量多2 - 5个对数级。这项研究的结果为理解和量化虫媒病毒的传播增添了关键信息。