Centre Max Weber-UMR 5283, Université Lumière-Lyon 2, 69676 Bron, France.
Social Sciences Group, Institut Paul Bocuse Research Center, 69130 Ecully, France.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 19;18(6):3186. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063186.
There exists a normative representation of family meals in contemporary Western societies which is promoted as imperative through public health programs, larger discourses and by some studies in the nutritional and public health research fields. Family meals, also called domestic commensality, are represented as convivial events and are associated with positive health and wellbeing outcomes but there is minimal evidence to show they are beneficial for family members and it is not known which aspect of the family meal could be responsible for these alleged benefits. This normative family meal image is based on a representation of the family as a peaceful unit exempt from external constraints. This narrative literature review of qualitative studies of family meals seeks to put forward the underlying premises of this representation and compare it with reports about actual practices. The results emphasize that eating together is still practiced and remains valued by family members, which is in contrast to discourses lamenting the decline of the family meal. However, the valorisation and recurrence of family meals depends on class, gender and cultural positions. There is a gap between the norm of healthy or convivial and achievable family meals, which can reinforce the so-called "mental load" and "emotion work" of those in charge of feeding the family and heighten inequalities within the household. In fact, there are many challenges to family meals which originate from external constraints or are inherent aspects of family life. The results from this review suggest that we should focus on family meals by taking into account the food work surrounding it and focussing on the interactional aspects of family meals. Ethnographic methods allow the researcher to observe the diversities and complexities of commensality as well as family dynamics and, in doing so, could provide more realistic representations of eating within the family.
在当代西方社会,有一种规范的家庭用餐模式,通过公共卫生项目、更广泛的论述以及营养和公共卫生研究领域的一些研究,这种模式被宣传为强制性的。家庭用餐,也称为家庭共餐,被描绘成欢乐的活动,与积极的健康和幸福结果相关,但几乎没有证据表明它们对家庭成员有益,也不知道家庭用餐的哪个方面可能对这些所谓的好处负责。这种规范的家庭用餐形象是基于家庭作为一个免受外部约束的和平单位的代表。本研究对家庭用餐的定性研究进行了文献综述,旨在提出这种代表性的基本前提,并将其与实际做法的报告进行比较。结果强调,一起吃饭的做法仍然在实践中,并且仍然受到家庭成员的重视,这与哀叹家庭用餐衰落的论述形成了对比。然而,家庭用餐的重视和再现取决于阶级、性别和文化立场。健康或欢乐的家庭用餐的规范与可实现的家庭用餐之间存在差距,这可能会加剧负责为家庭提供食物的人的所谓“精神负担”和“情感劳动”,并加剧家庭内部的不平等。事实上,家庭用餐面临着许多挑战,这些挑战源自外部约束或家庭生活的固有方面。本综述的结果表明,我们应该通过考虑围绕家庭用餐的食物工作,并关注家庭用餐的互动方面来关注家庭用餐。民族志方法可以让研究人员观察共餐和家庭动态的多样性和复杂性,并以此提供更现实的家庭饮食代表。