• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种面向奶农的新型实用动物福利评估方法。

A New, Practical Animal Welfare Assessment for Dairy Farmers.

作者信息

van Eerdenburg Frank J C M, Di Giacinto Alice M, Hulsen Jan, Snel Bert, Stegeman J Arjan

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Animal Sciences, Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 19;11(3):881. doi: 10.3390/ani11030881.

DOI:10.3390/ani11030881
PMID:33808871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8003747/
Abstract

The Welfare Quality assessment protocol (WQ) is the most extensive way to measure animal welfare. This study was set up to determine if resource-based welfare indicators, that are easier and faster to measure, could replace the more time consuming, animal-based measurements of the WQ. The WQ was applied on 60 dairy farms in the Netherlands, with good, moderate and poor welfare. The WQ protocol classified most farms (87%) as 'acceptable'. Several of the animal-based measures of WQ correlated well with measures in the environment. Using these correlations, an alternative welfare assessment protocol (new Welfare Monitor) was designed, which takes approximately 1.5 h for a farm with 100 dairy cows. Because the opinion of farmers about welfare assessment is important if one wants to improve conditions for the cows at a farm, another objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the new Welfare Monitor for the farmer. Over two years, the farms were visited, and advice was given to improve the conditions at the farm. After the first welfare assessment and advice, farmers improved the conditions for their cows substantially. Farms where the category score had increased made more improvements on average than those that did not upgrade.

摘要

福利质量评估方案(WQ)是衡量动物福利最全面的方法。本研究旨在确定基于资源的福利指标(测量起来更简便快捷)是否能够取代耗时更长的基于动物的WQ测量方法。WQ应用于荷兰60个奶牛场,这些奶牛场的福利状况有好、中、差之分。WQ方案将大多数农场(87%)归类为“可接受”。WQ的一些基于动物的测量方法与环境测量方法具有良好的相关性。利用这些相关性,设计了一种替代性福利评估方案(新福利监测器),对于一个拥有100头奶牛的农场,使用该方案大约需要1.5小时。由于如果想要改善农场奶牛的状况,农民对福利评估的看法很重要,因此本研究的另一个目标是评估新福利监测器对农民的实用性。在两年多的时间里,研究人员走访了这些农场,并就改善农场状况提供了建议。在首次进行福利评估并给出建议后,农民们大幅改善了奶牛的饲养条件。类别得分提高的农场平均比未升级的农场改进更多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/859c/8003747/cadd12602a46/animals-11-00881-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/859c/8003747/7ffc68e0d7bd/animals-11-00881-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/859c/8003747/d313642364c7/animals-11-00881-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/859c/8003747/1150fa2cb2cd/animals-11-00881-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/859c/8003747/18a54d335d70/animals-11-00881-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/859c/8003747/cadd12602a46/animals-11-00881-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/859c/8003747/7ffc68e0d7bd/animals-11-00881-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/859c/8003747/d313642364c7/animals-11-00881-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/859c/8003747/1150fa2cb2cd/animals-11-00881-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/859c/8003747/18a54d335d70/animals-11-00881-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/859c/8003747/cadd12602a46/animals-11-00881-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A New, Practical Animal Welfare Assessment for Dairy Farmers.一种面向奶农的新型实用动物福利评估方法。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 19;11(3):881. doi: 10.3390/ani11030881.
2
The effects of herd size on the welfare of dairy cows in a pasture-based system using animal- and resource-based indicators.利用基于动物和资源的指标评估牧场体系中畜群规模对奶牛福利的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Apr;102(4):3406-3420. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14850. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
3
Assessment of on-farm welfare for dairy cattle in southern Spain and its effects on reproductive parameters.评估西班牙南部奶牛场的福利状况及其对繁殖参数的影响。
J Dairy Res. 2019 May;86(2):165-170. doi: 10.1017/S0022029919000207. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
4
Relationship between herd size and measures of animal welfare on dairy cattle farms with freestall housing in Germany.德国带卧床饲养系统奶牛场奶牛群规模与动物福利衡量指标之间的关系。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Aug;101(8):7397-7411. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14232. Epub 2018 May 16.
5
Trained-user opinion about Welfare Quality measures and integrated scoring of dairy cattle welfare.经过培训的用户对奶牛福利质量指标及综合评分的看法。
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Aug;100(8):6376-6388. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12255. Epub 2017 May 30.
6
Impact of Daily Grazing Time on Dairy Cow Welfare-Results of the Welfare Quality Protocol.每日放牧时间对奶牛福利的影响——福利质量协议的结果
Animals (Basel). 2017 Dec 22;8(1):1. doi: 10.3390/ani8010001.
7
Creating a model to detect dairy cattle farms with poor welfare using a national database.利用国家数据库创建一个用于检测福利状况不佳的奶牛场的模型。
Prev Vet Med. 2015 Dec 1;122(3):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.10.014. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
8
Application of the Welfare Quality® assessment system on European beef bull farms.福利质量®评估体系在欧洲肉牛养殖场的应用。
Animal. 2014 May;8(5):827-35. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114000366.
9
Evaluating results of the Welfare Quality multi-criteria evaluation model for classification of dairy cattle welfare at the herd level.评估福利质量多标准评估模型在牛群水平上对奶牛福利进行分类的结果。
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Oct;96(10):6264-73. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6129. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
10
Animal Welfare and Farmers' Satisfaction in Small-Scale Dairy Farms in the Eastern Alps: A "One Welfare" Approach.东阿尔卑斯山小规模奶牛场的动物福利与农民满意度:一种“同一福利”方法
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Nov 10;8:741497. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.741497. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Animal Welfare Framing as an Effective Approach to Communicating Climate Change-A Review.将动物福利框架作为传达气候变化的有效途径——综述
Vet Med Sci. 2025 Jan;11(1):e70154. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70154.
2
Animal-based welfare indicators for dairy cows and their validity and practicality: a systematic review of the existing literature.奶牛基于动物的福利指标及其有效性和实用性:对现有文献的系统综述
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jul 11;11:1429097. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1429097. eCollection 2024.
3
Thermographic Profiles in Livestock Systems under Full Sun and Shaded Pastures during an Extreme Climate Event in the Eastern Amazon, Brazil: of 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Protection of Dairy Cattle in the EU: State of Play and Directions for Policymaking from a Legal and Animal Advocacy Perspective.欧盟奶牛保护:从法律和动物权益倡导角度看进展情况及政策制定方向
Animals (Basel). 2019 Dec 2;9(12):1066. doi: 10.3390/ani9121066.
2
Applying the reasoned action approach to understanding health protection and health risk behaviors.运用理性行为理论理解健康保护和健康风险行为。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Dec;195:140-148. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Oct 22.
3
Sensitivity of the Welfare Quality® broiler chicken protocol to differences between intensively reared indoor flocks: which factors explain overall classification?
巴西亚马逊东部2023年极端气候事件期间全日照和遮荫牧场畜牧系统的热成像剖面图
Animals (Basel). 2024 Mar 11;14(6):855. doi: 10.3390/ani14060855.
4
Obtaining an animal welfare status in Norwegian dairy herds-A mountain to climb.获取挪威奶牛群的动物福利状况——困难重重。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Feb 24;10:1125860. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1125860. eCollection 2023.
5
The relationship between common data-based indicators and the welfare of Swiss dairy herds.基于常见数据的指标与瑞士奶牛群福利之间的关系。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Oct 20;9:991363. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.991363. eCollection 2022.
6
Practical Application of the Five Domains Animal Welfare Framework for Supply Food Animal Chain Managers.五领域动物福利框架在供应食用动物产业链管理者中的实际应用
Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 18;12(20):2831. doi: 10.3390/ani12202831.
7
New approaches for risk assessment and management of bovine protothecosis.牛原虫病风险评估与管理的新方法。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022 Aug;29(8):103368. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103368. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
8
Data-Based Variables Used as Indicators of Dairy Cow Welfare at Farm Level: A Review.农场层面用作奶牛福利指标的基于数据的变量:综述
Animals (Basel). 2021 Dec 4;11(12):3458. doi: 10.3390/ani11123458.
9
The Relationship between Animal Welfare and Antimicrobial Use in Italian Dairy Farms.意大利奶牛场动物福利与抗菌药物使用之间的关系
Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 2;11(9):2575. doi: 10.3390/ani11092575.
10
Precision Technologies to Address Dairy Cattle Welfare: Focus on Lameness, Mastitis and Body Condition.解决奶牛福利问题的精准技术:关注跛足、乳腺炎和体况
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 30;11(8):2253. doi: 10.3390/ani11082253.
福利质量®肉鸡协议对密集饲养的室内鸡群之间差异的敏感性:哪些因素解释了总体分类?
Animal. 2017 Feb;11(2):244-253. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116001476. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
4
Navigating the iceberg: reducing the number of parameters within the Welfare Quality(®) assessment protocol for dairy cows.探索冰山一角:减少奶牛福利质量(®)评估协议中的参数数量。
Animal. 2014 Dec;8(12):1978-86. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114002018. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
5
Evaluating results of the Welfare Quality multi-criteria evaluation model for classification of dairy cattle welfare at the herd level.评估福利质量多标准评估模型在牛群水平上对奶牛福利进行分类的结果。
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Oct;96(10):6264-73. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6129. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
6
The welfare of dairy cows is improved in relation to cleanliness and integument alterations on the hocks and lameness when sand is used as stall surface.当沙作为牛栏地面时,奶牛的福利会因跗关节的清洁和表皮变化以及跛行而得到改善。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Sep;95(9):4961-4967. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5169.
7
Rumination and its relationship to feeding and lying behavior in Holstein dairy cows.反刍行为及其与荷斯坦奶牛采食和卧息行为的关系。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jun;95(6):3212-7. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4741.
8
Sickness behavior in dairy cows during Escherichia coli mastitis.奶牛大肠杆菌乳腺炎期间的疾病行为。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Feb;95(2):630-8. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4350.
9
Can pre-collected register data be used to identify dairy herds with good cattle welfare?能否利用预先收集的登记数据来识别奶牛福利良好的奶牛场?
Acta Vet Scand. 2011;53 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-53-S1-S8. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
10
Time budgets of lactating dairy cattle in commercial freestall herds.泌乳奶牛在商业散栏牛群中的时间分配。
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Dec;93(12):5772-81. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3436.