Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University.
Dent Mater J. 2021 May 29;40(3):781-791. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2020-260. Epub 2021 May 3.
To evaluate the bonding reliability of a universal adhesive compared to a commercial ceramic repair system for metal-ceramic cracks. In vitro part: sixty specimens with porcelain, metal and porcelain-metal substrate were fabricated. Half specimens were bonded by Singlebond Universal adhesive and Filtek Z350 resin composite. The other were processed by Ceramic Repair N. Shear bond strength was tested. In vivo part: forty patients with sixty ceramic fractured porcelain-fused-metal restorations were involved. Half were repaired by Singlebond Universal and Filtek Z350. The other were restored by Ceramic Repair N. The mean observation period was 65 weeks. Results showed the bond strength ranged from 13.97 MPa to 15.85 MPa using two different repair system on different substrate with no statistical difference. There was no statistical difference between the two adhesive system in survival rate according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. The universal adhesive had a similar repair performance compared to commercial ceramic repair system.
为了评估通用胶粘剂与商业陶瓷修复系统对金属陶瓷裂缝的粘结可靠性。体外部分:制作了 60 个具有瓷、金属和瓷金属基底的标本。一半的标本用单键通用胶粘剂和 Filtek Z350 树脂复合材料粘结。其他的则用 Ceramic Repair N 处理。测试剪切粘结强度。体内部分:涉及 40 名患者的 60 个陶瓷断裂烤瓷熔附金属修复体。一半用单键通用和 Filtek Z350 修复。另一半用 Ceramic Repair N 修复。平均观察期为 65 周。结果表明,使用两种不同的修复系统在不同的基底上的粘结强度范围为 13.97MPa 至 15.85MPa,无统计学差异。根据 Kaplan-Meier 分析,两种胶粘剂系统的存活率无统计学差异。通用胶粘剂与商业陶瓷修复系统具有相似的修复性能。