Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110 (J.W.J.); Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (J.D.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France (J.G., A.G.); Department of Radiology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France (X.B., J.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.N.K., M.C.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (S.G., F.A.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (A.J.H.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI (J.I.); Departments of Radiology (F.P) and Interventional Radiology (C.M.), Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Department of Radiology, Ascension Providence Rochester Hospital, Rochester, Mich (P.J.L.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (T.d.B., F.D.).
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2021 Feb 12;3(2):e200101. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2021200101. eCollection 2021 Mar.
To assess the clinical effectiveness of cryoablation for palliation of painful bone metastases.
MOTION (Multicenter Study of Cryoablation for Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases) (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02511678) was a multicenter, prospective, single-arm study of adults with metastatic bone disease who were not candidates for or had not benefited from standard therapy, that took place from February 2016 to March 2018. At baseline, participants rated their pain using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (reference range from 0 to 10 points); those with moderate to severe pain, who had at least one metastatic candidate tumor for ablation, were included. The primary effectiveness endpoint was change in pain score from baseline to week 8. Participants were followed for 24 weeks after treatment. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and logistic regression to evaluate changes in pain score over the postprocedure follow-up period.
A total of 66 participants (mean age, 60.8 years ± 14.3 [standard deviation]; 35 [53.0%] men) were enrolled and received cryoablation; 65 completed follow-up. Mean change in pain score from baseline to week 8 was -2.61 points (95% CI: -3.45, -1.78). Mean pain scores improved by 2 points at week 1 and reached clinically meaningful levels (more than a 2-point decrease) after week 8; scores continued to improve throughout follow-up. Quality of life improved, opioid doses were stabilized, and functional status was maintained over 6 months. Serious adverse events occurred in three participants.
Cryoablation of metastatic bone tumors provided rapid and durable pain palliation, improved quality of life, and offered an alternative to opioids for pain control. Ablation Techniques, Metastases, Pain Management, Radiation Therapy/Oncology© RSNA, 2021.
评估冷冻消融治疗骨转移疼痛的临床疗效。
MOTION(多中心冷冻消融治疗骨转移疼痛研究)(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02511678)是一项多中心、前瞻性、单臂研究,纳入了不符合标准治疗条件或未从标准治疗中获益的转移性骨病成人患者,研究于 2016 年 2 月至 2018 年 3 月进行。基线时,参与者使用简短疼痛量表(Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form)对疼痛进行评分(参考范围为 0 至 10 分);有中度至重度疼痛且至少有一个候选消融的转移性肿瘤的患者纳入研究。主要有效性终点是从基线到第 8 周疼痛评分的变化。治疗后随访 24 周。统计分析包括描述性统计和逻辑回归,以评估术后随访期间疼痛评分的变化。
共纳入 66 名参与者(平均年龄 60.8 岁±14.3[标准差];35 名[53.0%]男性)接受冷冻消融治疗,65 名完成随访。从基线到第 8 周,疼痛评分的平均变化为-2.61 分(95%CI:-3.45,-1.78)。疼痛评分在第 1 周改善 2 分,并在第 8 周后达到有临床意义的水平(下降超过 2 分);评分在随访期间持续改善。生活质量提高,阿片类药物剂量稳定,功能状态在 6 个月内保持稳定。3 名参与者发生严重不良事件。
冷冻消融治疗转移性骨肿瘤能迅速持久地缓解疼痛,改善生活质量,为疼痛控制提供了一种替代阿片类药物的方法。消融技术、转移瘤、疼痛管理、放射治疗/肿瘤学