• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用来自不同检测组的临床样本对 Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测试剂盒进行评估。

Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay evaluation using clinical samples from different testing groups.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Scienze Biotecnologiche di Base, Cliniche Intensivologiche e Perioperatorie, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Dipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Apr 7;59(8):1468-1476. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0182. Print 2021 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1515/cclm-2021-0182
PMID:33823089
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Compared to RT-PCR, lower performance of antigen detection assays, including the Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay, may depend on specific testing scenarios.

METHODS

We tested 594 nasopharyngeal swab samples from individuals with COVID-19 (RT-PCR cycle threshold [Ct] values ≤ 40) or non-COVID-19 (Ct values >40) diagnoses. RT-PCR positive samples were assigned to diagnostic, screening, or monitoring groups of testing.

RESULTS

With a limit of detection of 1.2 × 10 SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies/mL, Lumipulse showed positive percent agreement (PPA) of 79.9% (155/194) and negative percent agreement of 99.3% (397/400), whereas PPAs were 100% for samples with Ct values of <18 or 18-<25 and 92.5% for samples with Ct values of 25-<30. By three groups, Lumipulse showed PPA of 87.0% (60/69), 81.1% (43/53), or 72.2% (52/72), respectively, whereas PPA was 100% for samples with Ct values of <18 or 18-<25, and was 94.4, 80.0, or 100% for samples with Ct values of 25-<30, respectively. Additional testing of RT-PCR positive samples for SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RNA showed that, by three groups, PPA was 63.8% (44/69), 62.3% (33/53), or 33.3% (24/72), respectively. PPAs dropped to 55.6, 20.0, or 41.7% for samples with Ct values of 25-<30, respectively. All 101 samples with a subgenomic RNA positive result had a Lumipulse assay's antigen positive result, whereas only 54 (58.1%) of remaining 93 samples had a Lumipulse assay's antigen positive result.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumipulse assay was highly sensitive in samples with low RT-PCR Ct values, implying repeated testing to reduce consequences of false-negative results.

摘要

目的

与 RT-PCR 相比,抗原检测试剂盒(包括 Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测试剂盒)的性能较低,这可能取决于特定的检测情况。

方法

我们测试了 594 份来自 COVID-19 个体(RT-PCR 循环阈值 [Ct] 值≤40)或非 COVID-19 个体(Ct 值>40)的鼻咽拭子样本。将 RT-PCR 阳性样本分配到诊断、筛查或监测检测组。

结果

在检测限为 1.2×10 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 拷贝/mL 的情况下,Lumipulse 显示出 79.9%(155/194)的阳性百分一致率(PPA)和 99.3%(397/400)的阴性百分一致率,而对于 Ct 值<18 或 18-<25 的样本,PPA 为 100%,对于 Ct 值为 25-<30 的样本,PPA 为 92.5%。按三组计算,Lumipulse 的 PPA 分别为 87.0%(60/69)、81.1%(43/53)或 72.2%(52/72),而对于 Ct 值<18 或 18-<25 的样本,PPA 为 100%,对于 Ct 值为 25-<30 的样本,PPA 分别为 94.4%、80.0%或 100%。对 RT-PCR 阳性样本进行 SARS-CoV-2 亚基因组 RNA 的进一步检测显示,按三组计算,PPA 分别为 63.8%(44/69)、62.3%(33/53)或 33.3%(24/72),对于 Ct 值为 25-<30 的样本,PPA 分别降至 55.6%、20.0%或 41.7%。所有 101 份亚基因组 RNA 阳性结果的样本均有 Lumipulse 检测的抗原阳性结果,而在其余 93 份样本中,仅有 54 份(58.1%)有 Lumipulse 检测的抗原阳性结果。

结论

Lumipulse 检测在 RT-PCR Ct 值较低的样本中具有高度敏感性,提示重复检测以减少假阴性结果的后果。

相似文献

1
Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay evaluation using clinical samples from different testing groups.使用来自不同检测组的临床样本对 Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测试剂盒进行评估。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Apr 7;59(8):1468-1476. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0182. Print 2021 Jul 27.
2
Prospective study of 1308 nasopharyngeal swabs from 1033 patients using the LUMIPULSE SARS-CoV-2 antigen test: Comparison with RT-qPCR.1033 例患者 1308 份鼻咽拭子的前瞻性研究:LUMIPULSE SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测与 RT-qPCR 的比较。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
3
Evaluation of Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay automated test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) in nasopharyngeal swabs for community and population screening.Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2抗原检测法用于社区和人群筛查中检测鼻咽拭子中SARS-CoV-2核衣壳蛋白(NP)的自动化检测评估。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:391-396. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.098. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
4
Comparison of Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay, Easy SARS-CoV-2 WE and Lumipulse quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19.采用自动化系统比较 Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 检测试剂盒、Easy SARS-CoV-2 WE 检测试剂盒和 Lumipulse 定量 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒在 COVID-19 诊断中的性能。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;113:113-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.069. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
5
Analysis of a persistent viral shedding patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR, FilmArray Respiratory Panel v2.1, and antigen detection.采用 RT-qPCR、FilmArray 呼吸道Panel v2.1 和抗原检测对持续性病毒脱落感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者进行分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Feb;27(2):406-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.10.026. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
6
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection from combined nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab samples by a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR test and the Roche SARS-CoV-2 assay on a cobas 8800 instrument.比较实验室开发的实时 RT-PCR 检测与罗氏 cobas 8800 仪器上的 SARS-CoV-2 检测试剂盒对鼻咽/口咽联合拭子样本中 SARS-CoV-2 的检测。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Nov;132:104615. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104615. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
7
Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid antigen test to the real star Sars-CoV-2 RT PCR kit.比较 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测与 real star SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 试剂盒。
J Virol Methods. 2021 Feb;288:114024. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.114024. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
8
Accuracy and cost description of rapid antigen test compared with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2 detection.快速抗原检测与逆转录-聚合酶链反应检测 SARS-CoV-2 的准确性和成本描述。
Dan Med J. 2021 Jun 14;68(7):A03210217.
9
Evaluation of a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for the diagnosis of COVID-19: The VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test.基于化学发光酶免疫分析的高通量 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒用于 COVID-19 诊断的评估:VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒。
J Med Virol. 2021 Dec;93(12):6778-6781. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27153. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
10
Clinical evaluation of a multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in individual and pooled upper respiratory tract samples.用于检测个体和混合上呼吸道样本中 SARS-CoV-2 的多重实时 RT-PCR 检测的临床评估。
Arch Virol. 2021 Sep;166(9):2551-2561. doi: 10.1007/s00705-021-05148-1. Epub 2021 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated antigen assays display a high heterogeneity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including several Omicron sublineages.自动化抗原检测在检测 SARS-CoV-2 关注变体方面表现出高度的异质性,包括几种奥密克戎亚谱系。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2023 Oct;212(5):307-322. doi: 10.1007/s00430-023-00774-9. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
2
Evolution of the newest diagnostic methods for COVID-19: a Chinese perspective.新冠病毒最新诊断方法的演变:中国视角。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2023 Jun 15;24(6):463-484. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2200625.
3
Analytical performance evaluation of Lumipulse® SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in 392 asymptomatic patients.
Lumipulse® SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒在 392 例无症状患者中的分析性能评估。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2023 Mar;37(6):e24867. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24867. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
4
Clinical evaluation of DIAGNOVIR SARS-CoV-2 ultra-rapid antigen test performance compared to PCR-based testing.与基于 PCR 的检测相比,对 DIAGNOVIR SARS-CoV-2 超快速抗原检测性能的临床评估。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 17;13(1):4438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8.
5
Development of a Fully Automated Desktop Analyzer and Ultrahigh Sensitivity Digital Immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Antigen Detection.用于SARS-CoV-2核衣壳抗原检测的全自动台式分析仪及超高灵敏度数字免疫分析方法的开发
Biomedicines. 2022 Sep 15;10(9):2291. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092291.
6
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
7
The Detection of SARS-CoV2 Antigen in Wastewater Using an Automated Chemiluminescence Enzyme Immunoassay.利用自动化化学发光酶免疫分析检测污水中的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 24;19(13):7783. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137783.
8
Performance of Antigen Detection Tests for SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新型冠状病毒抗原检测试验的性能:系统评价与荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 4;12(6):1388. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061388.
9
SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test Results to Infer Active or Non-Active Virus Replication Status in COVID-19 Patients.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗原检测结果用于推断新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者的病毒复制处于活跃还是非活跃状态
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 28;12(6):1338. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061338.
10
Factors that Influence the Reported Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2.影响新冠病毒快速抗原检测报告敏感性的因素。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Oct 5;12:714242. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.714242. eCollection 2021.