• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国比特币区块链运行的碳排放流和可持续性的政策评估。

Policy assessments for the carbon emission flows and sustainability of Bitcoin blockchain operation in China.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2021 Apr 6;12(1):1938. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22256-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-22256-3
PMID:33824331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8024295/
Abstract

The growing energy consumption and associated carbon emission of Bitcoin mining could potentially undermine global sustainable efforts. By investigating carbon emission flows of Bitcoin blockchain operation in China with a simulation-based Bitcoin blockchain carbon emission model, we find that without any policy interventions, the annual energy consumption of the Bitcoin blockchain in China is expected to peak in 2024 at 296.59 Twh and generate 130.50 million metric tons of carbon emission correspondingly. Internationally, this emission output would exceed the total annualized greenhouse gas emission output of the Czech Republic and Qatar. Domestically, it ranks in the top 10 among 182 cities and 42 industrial sectors in China. In this work, we show that moving away from the current punitive carbon tax policy to a site regulation policy which induces changes in the energy consumption structure of the mining activities is more effective in limiting carbon emission of Bitcoin blockchain operation.

摘要

比特币挖矿日益增长的能源消耗和相关碳排放可能会破坏全球的可持续发展努力。通过基于模拟的比特币区块链碳排放模型,研究中国比特币区块链运营的碳排放流,我们发现,如果没有任何政策干预,中国比特币区块链的年能源消耗预计将在 2024 年达到峰值,为 2965.90 太瓦时,相应产生 1.305 亿吨碳排放。在国际上,这一排放量将超过捷克共和国和卡塔尔的温室气体年排放量总和。在国内,它在中国 182 个城市和 42 个工业部门中排名前 10 位。在这项工作中,我们表明,从当前的惩罚性碳税政策转向场地监管政策,这种政策可以改变挖矿活动的能源消耗结构,从而更有效地限制比特币区块链运营的碳排放。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b10b/8024295/fb05b85320e3/41467_2021_22256_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b10b/8024295/c8e17c3c7431/41467_2021_22256_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b10b/8024295/83e8b8bcbc88/41467_2021_22256_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b10b/8024295/419d35777e10/41467_2021_22256_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b10b/8024295/fb05b85320e3/41467_2021_22256_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b10b/8024295/c8e17c3c7431/41467_2021_22256_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b10b/8024295/83e8b8bcbc88/41467_2021_22256_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b10b/8024295/419d35777e10/41467_2021_22256_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b10b/8024295/fb05b85320e3/41467_2021_22256_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Policy assessments for the carbon emission flows and sustainability of Bitcoin blockchain operation in China.中国比特币区块链运行的碳排放流和可持续性的政策评估。
Nat Commun. 2021 Apr 6;12(1):1938. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22256-3.
2
Life cycle assessment of behind-the-meter Bitcoin mining at US power plant.美国发电厂厂内比特币挖矿的生命周期评估。
Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2022;27(3):355-365. doi: 10.1007/s11367-022-02025-0. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
3
Is there more to bitcoin mining than carbon emissions?比特币挖矿的影响是否不止于碳排放?
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):e15099. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15099. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Dataset on bitcoin carbon footprint and energy consumption.关于比特币碳足迹和能源消耗的数据集。
Data Brief. 2022 May 11;42:108252. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108252. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Confronting the Carbon-Footprint Challenge of Blockchain.应对区块链的碳足迹挑战。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Jan 6. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c05165.
6
Life Cycle Assessment of Bitcoin Mining.比特币挖矿的生命周期评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Dec 3;53(23):13598-13606. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05687. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
7
Climate sustainability through a dynamic duo: Green hydrogen and crypto driving energy transition and decarbonization.通过一对活力组合实现气候可持续性:绿色氢能与加密技术推动能源转型和脱碳。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Apr 2;121(14):e2313911121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2313911121. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
8
Modeling and Simulation of the Economics of Mining in the Bitcoin Market.比特币市场中采矿经济学的建模与仿真
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 21;11(10):e0164603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164603. eCollection 2016.
9
Do bitcoin electricity consumption and carbon footprint exhibit random walk and bubbles? Analysis with policy implications.比特币耗电量和碳足迹是否具有随机游走和泡沫特征?政策含义分析。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;367:121958. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121958. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
10
Steganographic Analysis of Blockchains.区块链的隐写分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 13;21(12):4078. doi: 10.3390/s21124078.

引用本文的文献

1
The environmental burden of the United States' bitcoin mining boom.美国比特币挖矿热潮带来的环境负担。
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 26;16(1):2970. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58287-3.
2
Nonlinear connectedness of conventional crypto-assets and sustainable crypto-assets with climate change: A complex systems modelling approach.传统加密资产与可持续加密资产与气候变化的非线性关联:一种复杂系统建模方法。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 7;20(2):e0318647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318647. eCollection 2025.
3
Can ICT investment promote green development? new insights from highly polluting listed enterprises in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Blockchain-facilitated sharing to advance outbreak R&D.区块链助力共享以推动疫情相关研发。
Science. 2020 May 15;368(6492):719-721. doi: 10.1126/science.aba1355.
2
The technological and economic prospects for CO utilization and removal.CO 的利用和去除的技术和经济前景。
Nature. 2019 Nov;575(7781):87-97. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1681-6. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Assessing the Policy gaps for achieving China's climate targets in the Paris Agreement.评估实现《巴黎协定》中国气候目标的政策差距。
信息通信技术投资能否促进绿色发展?来自中国高污染上市公司的新见解。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 30;19(12):e0316337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316337. eCollection 2024.
4
The Environmental Burden of the United States' Bitcoin Mining Boom.美国比特币挖矿热潮的环境负担
Res Sq. 2024 Oct 22:rs.3.rs-5306015. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5306015/v1.
5
Climate sustainability through a dynamic duo: Green hydrogen and crypto driving energy transition and decarbonization.通过一对活力组合实现气候可持续性:绿色氢能与加密技术推动能源转型和脱碳。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Apr 2;121(14):e2313911121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2313911121. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
6
Connectedness in cross-assets and digital assets attention indices.跨资产与数字资产关注度指数中的关联性。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 11;9(10):e20668. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20668. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
The COVID-19 pandemic and Bitcoin: Perspective from investor attention.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情与比特币:基于投资者关注度的视角。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 12;11:1147838. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147838. eCollection 2023.
8
Is there more to bitcoin mining than carbon emissions?比特币挖矿的影响是否不止于碳排放?
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):e15099. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15099. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
The transaction behavior of cryptocurrency and electricity consumption.加密货币的交易行为与电力消耗。
Financ Innov. 2023;9(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40854-023-00449-7. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
10
Non-fungible tokens in ophthalmology: what is it good for?眼科中的非同质化代币:它有什么用?
Eye (Lond). 2023 Aug;37(12):2434-2435. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02371-1. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 26;10(1):1256. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09159-0.
4
Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C.《巴黎协定》气候提案需要进一步推动,才能将升温控制在 2°C 以下。
Nature. 2016 Jun 30;534(7609):631-9. doi: 10.1038/nature18307.
5
Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China.中国化石燃料燃烧和水泥生产的碳排放量估算值降低。
Nature. 2015 Aug 20;524(7565):335-8. doi: 10.1038/nature14677.
6
The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests.人类在温带和北方森林碳循环中的足迹。
Nature. 2007 Jun 14;447(7146):848-50. doi: 10.1038/nature05847.
7
A system dynamics model to facilitate public understanding of water management options in Las Vegas, Nevada.一个用于促进公众理解内华达州拉斯维加斯市水资源管理选项的系统动力学模型。
J Environ Manage. 2003 Apr;67(4):303-13. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4797(02)00205-0.