• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于湿吸引与传统内镜超声引导下对上消化道上皮下病变进行细针抽吸技术的随机交叉试验性研究。

A Pilot Randomized Crossover Trial of Wet Suction and Conventional Techniques of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions.

作者信息

Takasumi Mika, Hikichi Takuto, Hashimoto Minami, Nakamura Jun, Kato Tsunetaka, Kikuchi Hitomi, Waragai Yuichi, Watanabe Ko, Takagi Tadayuki, Suzuki Rei, Sugimoto Mitsuru, Hayashi Manabu, Sato Yuki, Irie Hiroki, Kobashi Ryoichiro, Okubo Yoshinori, Kobayakawa Masao, Ohira Hiromasa

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.

Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2021 Mar 22;2021:4913107. doi: 10.1155/2021/4913107. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/4913107
PMID:33824658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8007354/
Abstract

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with UGI-SELs indicated for EUS-FNA were randomly assigned to the dry-first arm using the dry technique for the first two passes or the wet-first arm using the wet technique for the first two passes using a cross-over design with a ratio of 1 : 1. The primary endpoint was the cellularity score of the EUS-FNA specimens rated on a 4-point scale (0-3). The secondary endpoints were the factors influencing cellularity in each suction technique.

RESULTS

The mean cellularity score was 1.65 ± 1.20 for the wet technique and 2.00 ± 0.98 for the dry technique ( = 0.068). Logistic regression analysis showed that higher cellularity may be related to the final diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the dry technique and the SEL location in the upper stomach in the wet technique.

CONCLUSION

The wet EUS-FNA technique failed to show a potential for improved cellularity of specimens compared to the dry technique for UGI-SELs.

摘要

方法

26例因上消化道黏膜下病变(UGI-SELs)需行超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)的患者,采用交叉设计,以1∶1的比例随机分为先干组(前两针采用干抽技术)或先湿组(前两针采用湿抽技术)。主要终点是EUS-FNA标本的细胞丰富度评分,采用4分制(0 - 3分)。次要终点是每种抽吸技术中影响细胞丰富度的因素。

结果

湿抽技术的平均细胞丰富度评分为1.65±1.20,干抽技术为2.00±0.98(P = 0.068)。逻辑回归分析显示,较高的细胞丰富度可能与干抽技术中胃肠道间质瘤的最终诊断以及湿抽技术中上段胃的SEL位置有关。

结论

对于UGI-SELs,与干抽技术相比,湿抽EUS-FNA技术未能显示出提高标本细胞丰富度的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ee2/8007354/574df739a26e/GRP2021-4913107.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ee2/8007354/58b2dc343d33/GRP2021-4913107.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ee2/8007354/6c84bd3c3696/GRP2021-4913107.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ee2/8007354/574df739a26e/GRP2021-4913107.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ee2/8007354/58b2dc343d33/GRP2021-4913107.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ee2/8007354/6c84bd3c3696/GRP2021-4913107.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ee2/8007354/574df739a26e/GRP2021-4913107.003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Pilot Randomized Crossover Trial of Wet Suction and Conventional Techniques of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions.一项关于湿吸引与传统内镜超声引导下对上消化道上皮下病变进行细针抽吸技术的随机交叉试验性研究。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2021 Mar 22;2021:4913107. doi: 10.1155/2021/4913107. eCollection 2021.
2
The Wet Suction Technique Enhances the Diagnostic Efficacy and Aspirate Quality of EUS-FNA for Solid Lesions: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in China.湿吸技术提高了超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检对实性病变的诊断效能和抽吸质量:一项中国多中心回顾性研究
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 1;57(4):417-422. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001700.
3
Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术(EUS-FNA)中改良湿吸技术与干吸技术对实体病灶的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Jan 17;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2380-y.
4
"Wet suction technique (WEST)": a novel way to enhance the quality of EUS-FNA aspirate. Results of a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial using a 22-gauge needle for EUS-FNA of solid lesions."湿吸技术(WEST)":一种提高 EUS-FNA 抽吸物质量的新方法。一项使用 22 号针进行 EUS-FNA 实性病变的前瞻性、单盲、随机、对照试验的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1401-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.023. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
5
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: just wet it.内镜超声引导下胃肠道黏膜下病变的取样:只需润湿。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec 1;33(12):1533-1538. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002108.
6
Clinical usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for gastric subepithelial lesions smaller than 2 cm.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺对小于2cm胃黏膜下病变的临床应用价值
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2014 Dec;23(4):405-12. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.234.eug.
7
Influence of layer, size and organ of subepithelial lesions of upper gastrointestinal tract in outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.上消化道黏膜下病变的层次、大小和部位对内镜超声引导下细针抽吸结果的影响。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2014 Apr;3(Suppl 1):S16.
8
EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.EUS 引导下的细针活检与 FNA 在诊断黏膜下病变中的对比:一项大型多中心研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):108-119.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.021. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
9
Opinion: How to manage subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract?观点:如何处理上消化道的上皮下病变?
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Dec 10;7(18):1262-7. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i18.1262.
10
EUS-guided FNA and FNB after on-site cytological evaluation in gastric subepithelial tumors.超声内镜引导下对胃上皮下肿瘤进行现场细胞学评估后的细针穿刺抽吸活检和细针穿刺活检
J Dig Dis. 2016 Sep;17(9):582-587. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12381.

引用本文的文献

1
EUS-guided tissue acquisition from gastric subepithelial lesions-The optimal technique still remains undecided.超声内镜引导下从胃上皮下病变获取组织——最佳技术仍未确定。
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2024 Jul 19;27(4):263-264. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12398. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Comparison of suction techniques for EUS-guided tissue acquisition: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.超声内镜引导下组织获取的抽吸技术比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Aug 1;11(8):E703-E711. doi: 10.1055/a-2085-3674. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized controlled trial comparing the Franseen needle with the Fork-tip needle for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy.随机对照试验比较 Franseen 针与叉尖针在超声内镜引导下细针活检中的应用。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):140-150.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.057. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
2
EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.EUS 引导下的细针活检与 FNA 在诊断黏膜下病变中的对比:一项大型多中心研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):108-119.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.021. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
3
Can the wet suction technique change the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis type 1? A prospective single-arm study.
内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术用于胃肠道黏膜下病变。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2024 Apr;51(2):195-207. doi: 10.1007/s10396-023-01342-7. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
4
Usefulness of a Fork-Tip Needle in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy for Gastric Subepithelial Lesions.叉尖针在内镜超声引导下对胃上皮下病变进行细针穿刺活检中的应用价值。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Oct 12;11(10):1883. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101883.
湿抽吸引术能否改变内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术对1型自身免疫性胰腺炎的诊断效能?一项前瞻性单臂研究。
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Jan 6;8(1):88-96. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i1.88.
4
Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study.细针活检(FNB)与细针穿刺抽吸(FNA)组织及分子产量的比较:一项随机研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Aug;7(8):E955-E963. doi: 10.1055/a-0903-2565. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
5
Efficacy of Mucosal Cutting Biopsy for the Histopathological Diagnosis of Gastric Submucosal Tumors.黏膜切除活检对胃黏膜下肿瘤组织病理学诊断的效能
Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr 9;13(1):185-194. doi: 10.1159/000499442. eCollection 2019 Jan-Apr.
6
The difference in histological yield between 19G EUS-FNA and EUS-fine-needle biopsy needles.19G超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检针与超声内镜细针活检针在组织学取材量上的差异。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Jul-Aug;8(4):255-260. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_12_19.
7
Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with a rapid on-site evaluation for gastric subepithelial lesions: A randomized cross-over study.黏膜切口辅助活检与内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术联合快速现场评估用于胃黏膜下病变:一项随机交叉研究。
Dig Endosc. 2019 Jul;31(4):413-421. doi: 10.1111/den.13367. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
8
A prospective pilot comparison of wet and dry heparinized suction for EUS-guided liver biopsy (with videos).超声内镜引导下肝活检中湿肝素化抽吸与干肝素化抽吸的前瞻性试点比较(附视频)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Dec;88(6):919-925. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.07.036. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
9
Current clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.胃肠道间质瘤的当前临床管理。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 14;24(26):2806-2817. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i26.2806.
10
Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions.新型细针活检装置用于超声内镜引导下实体病变采样性能的前瞻性评估。
Clin Endosc. 2018 Nov;51(6):576-583. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.053. Epub 2018 Jul 13.