• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多参数磁共振成像有助于在对子宫内膜癌进行保留生育力管理之前选择患者。

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging facilitates the selection of patients prior to fertility-sparing management of endometrial cancer.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Sep;46(9):4410-4419. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03050-7. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-021-03050-7
PMID:33825929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10152338/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) versus multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for the staging of well-differentiated endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) in potential candidates for fertility-sparing management.

METHODS

This multi-center retrospective study included 48 potential candidates for fertility-sparing management (age <46 years, grade 1 endometroid EC) who did not wish to undergo fertility-sparing management and thus underwent definitive surgery. Two readers (R1, R2) independently reviewed bpMRI (T1, T2, and diffusion-weighted imaging) and mpMRI (bpMRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, DCE) during two separate sessions spaced one month apart for the presence of myometrial invasion (MI), cervical stromal involvement (CSI), malignant adnexal disease (mAD), and pelvic lymphadenopathy (pLNM). Each reader also recorded maximum tumor diameter, tumor volume, and tumor-to-uterine volume ratio (TVR) on T2-weighted imaging. The diagnostic performance of bpMRI and mpMRI was determined for each reader with surgical pathology serving as a gold standard.

RESULTS

The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for bpMRI versus mpMRI was 0.76/0.78 (R1/R2) versus 0.84/0.83 for MI, 0.79/0.76 versus 0.99/0.80 for CSI, 0.84/0.84 versus 0.84/0.80 for mAD, and 0.82/0.82 for pLMN. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detecting tumor spread beyond the endometrium were 71%/77% and 71%/65% for bpMRI (R1/R2) vs. 84%/90% and 71%/65% for mpMRI (R1/R2), respectively. The AUC of maximum tumor diameter, tumor volume, and TVR for MI was 0.71/0.61, 0.73/0.75, and 0.75/0.77 for R1/R2, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MRI had moderate diagnostic performance across potential candidates for fertility-sparing treatment of EC. mpMRI outperformed bpMRI for detecting EC spreading beyond the endometrium.

摘要

目的

比较双参数磁共振成像(bpMRI)与多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)在潜在生育保留管理候选者中对分化良好的子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌(EC)进行分期的诊断性能。

方法

这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了 48 名潜在的生育保留管理候选者(年龄<46 岁,G1 子宫内膜样 EC),他们不希望进行生育保留管理,因此接受了确定性手术。两位读者(R1、R2)分别在相隔一个月的两次会议上独立检查 bpMRI(T1、T2 和弥散加权成像)和 mpMRI(bpMRI 和动态对比增强成像,DCE),以评估是否存在子宫肌层侵犯(MI)、宫颈基质受累(CSI)、恶性附件疾病(mAD)和盆腔淋巴结病(pLNM)。每位读者还记录 T2 加权成像上的最大肿瘤直径、肿瘤体积和肿瘤与子宫体积比(TVR)。以手术病理为金标准,确定 bpMRI 和 mpMRI 的诊断性能。

结果

bpMRI 与 mpMRI 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.76/0.78(R1/R2)和 0.84/0.83 用于 MI,0.79/0.76 用于 CSI,0.84/0.84 用于 mAD,0.82/0.82 用于 pLNM。MRI 检测肿瘤是否超出子宫内膜的敏感性和特异性分别为 71%/77%和 71%/65%的 bpMRI(R1/R2)与 84%/90%和 71%/65%的 mpMRI(R1/R2)。用于 MI 的最大肿瘤直径、肿瘤体积和 TVR 的 AUC 分别为 0.71/0.61、0.73/0.75 和 0.75/0.77,用于 R1/R2。

结论

MRI 在 EC 潜在生育保留治疗的候选者中具有中等的诊断性能。mpMRI 在检测 EC 超出子宫内膜的扩散方面优于 bpMRI。

相似文献

1
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging facilitates the selection of patients prior to fertility-sparing management of endometrial cancer.多参数磁共振成像有助于在对子宫内膜癌进行保留生育力管理之前选择患者。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Sep;46(9):4410-4419. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03050-7. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
2
Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.基于PI-RADS v2.1的双参数和多参数MRI在检测临床显著性前列腺癌中的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jan;53(1):283-291. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27283. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
Prostate cancer detection with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) by readers with different experience: performance and comparison with multiparametric (mpMRI).双参数磁共振成像(bpMRI)在不同经验水平的阅片者中对前列腺癌的检测:与多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)的比较及性能评估。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 May;44(5):1883-1893. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01934-3.
4
Benefit of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging for prostate cancer detection depending on readers experience in prostate MRI.根据读者在前列腺MRI方面的经验,动态对比增强(DCE)成像对前列腺癌检测的益处。
Clin Radiol. 2024 Mar;79(3):e468-e474. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.11.026. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
5
Biparametric versus Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessing Muscle Invasion in Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma with Variant Histology Using the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System.基于膀胱影像学报告和数据系统的膀胱尿路上皮癌异型组织学的肌层侵犯评估中双参数与多参数磁共振成像的比较
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Jan;10(1):131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.004. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice.二参数与三参数前列腺 MRI 诊断准确性:评估临床实践中的对比获益。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul;30(7):4039-4049. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06782-0. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
7
Comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in biopsy naïve patients.双参数与多参数前列腺MRI在初诊活检患者中检测包膜外侵犯和精囊侵犯的比较
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Aug;141:109804. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109804. Epub 2021 May 27.
8
MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.MRI 联合 PSA 密度在检测 PSA 血清水平为 4∼10ng/mL 的患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌:双参数与多参数 MRI。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Apr;101(4):235-244. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
9
Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity of Biparametric versus Multiparametric Prostate MRI in the Detection of Prostate Cancer in 431 Men with Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels.431名前列腺特异性抗原水平升高男性中,双参数与多参数前列腺MRI检测前列腺癌的敏感性和特异性比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 7;11(7):1223. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071223.
10
Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.前列腺机器人辅助经会阴融合前列腺活检前前列腺双参数与多参数 MRI 的头对头比较。
World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2431-2438. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04120-1. Epub 2022 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Endometrial Cancer: A Daily Clinical Practice Guide for Radiologists.子宫内膜癌:放射科医生日常临床实践指南
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2025;24(3):387-402. doi: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2025-0004.
2
Updated ESUR Guidelines for Endometrial Cancer: integrating MRI with the 2023 FIGO Staging Revolution.更新后的欧洲泌尿生殖放射学会子宫内膜癌指南:将磁共振成像与2023年国际妇产科联盟分期变革相结合。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11700-3.
3
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines on MR imaging prior to fertility-sparing treatments in patients with cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers.欧洲泌尿生殖放射学会(ESUR)关于宫颈癌、子宫内膜癌和卵巢癌患者保留生育功能治疗前磁共振成像的指南。
Eur Radiol. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11625-x.
4
Assessment of endometrial cancer with microcystic, elongated, and fragmented pattern invasion using multiparametric MRI.使用多参数磁共振成像评估具有微囊状、细长状和碎片状浸润模式的子宫内膜癌。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04937-5.
5
Role of Multiparametric MRI in the Preoperative Evaluation of Endometrial Carcinoma: A Cross-Sectional Study.多参数磁共振成像在子宫内膜癌术前评估中的作用:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 21;16(7):e65058. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65058. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Radiomics-based fertility-sparing treatment in endometrial carcinoma: a review.基于放射组学的子宫内膜癌保留生育功能治疗:综述
Insights Imaging. 2023 Jul 19;14(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01473-y.
7
Peritumoral Enhancement for the Evaluation of Myometrial Invasion in Low-Risk Endometrial Carcinoma on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.动态对比增强MRI上瘤周强化对低风险子宫内膜癌肌层浸润的评估
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 17;11:793709. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.793709. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic efficacy of MRI for pre-operative assessment of ovarian malignancy in endometrial carcinoma: A decision tree analysis.磁共振成像(MRI)对子宫内膜癌卵巢恶性肿瘤术前评估的诊断效能:一项决策树分析
Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Apr;57:285-292. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
2
Endometrial Cancer MRI staging: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.子宫内膜癌 MRI 分期:欧洲泌尿生殖放射学会更新指南。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Feb;29(2):792-805. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5515-y. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
3
Cancer statistics, 2018.癌症统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
4
Assessment of Myometrial Invasion in Premenopausal Grade 1 Endometrial Carcinoma: Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Reliable Tool in Selecting Patients for Fertility-Preserving Therapy?绝经前1级子宫内膜癌肌层浸润的评估:磁共振成像在选择保留生育功能治疗的患者中是一种可靠的工具吗?
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018 May/Jun;42(3):412-417. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000689.
5
Fertility-preservation in endometrial cancer: is it safe? Review of the literature.子宫内膜癌的生育力保存:安全吗?文献综述。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2016 Dec 1;20(4):232-239. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20160045.
6
Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions.诊断准确性的测量:基本定义。
EJIFCC. 2009 Jan 20;19(4):203-11. eCollection 2009 Jan.
7
Endometrial cancer with cervical stromal invasion: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging at 3T.伴有宫颈间质浸润的子宫内膜癌:3T磁共振成像中扩散加权成像与动态对比增强成像的诊断准确性
Eur Radiol. 2017 May;27(5):1867-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4583-0. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
8
Application of FLASH-3D dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma.FLASH-3D动态对比增强成像在子宫内膜癌诊断中的应用。
Br J Radiol. 2016 Oct;89(1066):20160268. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160268. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
9
Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines 2013 for the treatment of uterine body neoplasms.日本妇科肿瘤学会2013年子宫体肿瘤治疗指南
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;21(3):419-34. doi: 10.1007/s10147-016-0981-1. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
10
ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO 子宫内膜癌共识会议:诊断、治疗和随访。
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jan;27(1):16-41. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv484. Epub 2015 Dec 2.