Suppr超能文献

两种用于实验室测量 HbA1c 的毛细血管样本采集试剂盒的评估。

An Evaluation of Two Capillary Sample Collection Kits for Laboratory Measurement of HbA1c.

机构信息

Jaeb Center for Health Research, 15310 Amberly Dr, Suite 350, Tampa, Florida, 33647 USA.

Rocky Mountain Clinical Research, Idaho Falls, Idaho, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Aug;23(8):537-545. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0023. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the conduct of clinic visits. We conducted a study to evaluate two academic laboratories' fingerstick capillary blood collection kits suitable for home use for laboratory measurement of HbA1c. Four clinical sites recruited 240 participants (aged 4-80 years, HbA1c 5.1%-13.5%). Capillary blood samples were obtained by the participant or parent using collection kits from two laboratories (University of Minnesota Advanced Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (ARDL) and Children's Mercy Hospital Laboratory (CMH)) and mailed under varying shipping conditions by United States Postal Service to the laboratories. Comparisons were made between HbA1c measurements from capillary samples and contemporaneously obtained venous samples. The primary outcome was percentage of capillary HbA1c values within 5% of the corresponding venous values. HbA1c values were within 5% of venous values for 96% of ARDL kit specimens shipped with a cold pack and 98% without a cold pack and 99% and 99%, respectively, for the CMH kits. values were 0.98, 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99, respectively. Results appeared similar across HbA1c levels and for pediatric and adult participants. Usability survey scores were high. Capillary blood collection kits, suitable for home use, from two academic laboratories, were demonstrated to be easy to use and provided results that are comparable with those obtained from venous specimens. Based on these results, there is strong evidence that HbA1c measurements from capillary specimens obtained with these specific kits can be used interchangeably with HbA1c measurements from venous specimens for clinical research and clinical care.

摘要

新冠疫情大流行影响了临床就诊的进行。我们开展了一项研究,旨在评估两个学术实验室的家用指尖毛细血管血采集套件,用于实验室测量糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)。四个临床站点共招募了 240 名参与者(年龄 4-80 岁,HbA1c 5.1%-13.5%)。参与者或其父母使用来自两个实验室(明尼苏达大学先进研究和诊断实验室(ARDL)和儿童医院实验室(CMH)的采集套件采集毛细血管血样,并通过美国邮政服务以不同的邮寄条件邮寄至实验室。比较了毛细血管血样和同期采集的静脉血样的 HbA1c 测量值。主要结局是毛细血管 HbA1c 值与相应静脉值相差在 5%以内的比例。在冷藏包运输的情况下,ARDL 试剂盒标本的 96%,在无冷藏包运输的情况下 98%,以及 CMH 试剂盒标本的 99%和 99%的毛细血管 HbA1c 值与静脉值相差在 5%以内。相应的一致性系数分别为 0.98、0.99、0.99 和 0.99。结果在不同 HbA1c 水平、儿科和成人参与者中均相似。使用情况调查评分较高。两个学术实验室的家用指尖毛细血管血采集套件易于使用,提供的结果与静脉标本获得的结果相当。基于这些结果,有强有力的证据表明,使用这些特定套件从毛细血管标本获得的 HbA1c 测量值可以与从静脉标本获得的 HbA1c 测量值在临床研究和临床护理中互换使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验