Kislaya Irina, Leite Andreia, Perelman Julian, Machado Ausenda, Torres Ana Rita, Tolonen Hanna, Nunes Baltazar
Departament of Epidemiology, National Health Institute Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.
NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Arch Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;79(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00562-y.
Accurate data on hypertension is essential to inform decision-making. Hypertension prevalence may be underestimated by population-based surveys due to misclassification of health status by participants. Therefore, adjustment for misclassification bias is required when relying on self-reports. This study aims to quantify misclassification bias in self-reported hypertension prevalence and prevalence ratios in the Portuguese component of the European Health Interview Survey (INS2014), and illustrate application of multiple imputation (MIME) for bias correction using measured high blood pressure data from the first Portuguese health examination survey (INSEF).
We assumed that objectively measured hypertension status was missing for INS2014 participants (n = 13,937) and imputed it using INSEF (n = 4910) as auxiliary data. Self-reported, objectively measured and MIME-corrected hypertension prevalence and prevalence ratios (PR) by sex, age group and education were estimated. Bias in self-reported and MIME-corrected estimates were computed using objectively measured INSEF data as a gold-standard.
Self-reported INS2014 data underestimated hypertension prevalence in all population subgroups, with misclassification bias ranging from 5.2 to 18.6 percentage points (pp). After MIME-correction, prevalence estimates increased and became closer to objectively measured ones, with bias reduction to 0 pp - 5.7 pp. Compared to objectively measured INSEF, self-reported INS2014 data considerably underestimated prevalence ratio by sex (PR = 0.8, 95CI = [0.7, 0.9] vs. PR = 1.2, 95CI = [1.1, 1.4]). MIME successfully corrected direction of association with sex in bivariate (PR = 1.1, 95CI = [1.0, 1.3]) and multivariate analyses (PR = 1.2, 95CI = [1.0, 1.3]). Misclassification bias in hypertension prevalence ratios by education and age group were less pronounced and did not require correction in multivariate analyses.
Our results highlight the importance of misclassification bias analysis in self-reported hypertension. Multiple imputation is a feasible approach to adjust for misclassification bias in prevalence estimates and exposure-outcomes associations in survey data.
准确的高血压数据对于决策至关重要。由于参与者对健康状况的错误分类,基于人群的调查可能会低估高血压患病率。因此,在依赖自我报告时,需要对错误分类偏差进行调整。本研究旨在量化欧洲健康访谈调查(INS2014)葡萄牙部分中自我报告的高血压患病率和患病率比中的错误分类偏差,并说明使用葡萄牙第一次健康检查调查(INSEF)的测量高血压数据进行多重填补(MIME)以校正偏差的应用。
我们假设INS2014参与者(n = 13937)的客观测量高血压状态缺失,并使用INSEF(n = 4910)作为辅助数据进行填补。估计了按性别、年龄组和教育程度划分的自我报告、客观测量和MIME校正的高血压患病率和患病率比(PR)。使用客观测量的INSEF数据作为金标准计算自我报告和MIME校正估计中的偏差。
自我报告的INS2014数据低估了所有人群亚组中的高血压患病率,错误分类偏差范围为5.2至18.6个百分点(pp)。经过MIME校正后,患病率估计值增加并更接近客观测量值,偏差减少至0 pp - 5.7 pp。与客观测量的INSEF相比,自我报告的INS2014数据在按性别划分的患病率比方面存在相当大的低估(PR = 0.8,95CI = [0.7, 0.9] 对比 PR = 1.2,95CI = [1.1, 1.4])。MIME在双变量分析(PR = 1.1,95CI = [1.0, 1.3])和多变量分析(PR = 1.2,95CI = [1.0, 1.3])中成功校正了与性别的关联方向。按教育程度和年龄组划分的高血压患病率比中的错误分类偏差不太明显,在多变量分析中不需要校正。
我们的结果突出了自我报告高血压中错误分类偏差分析的重要性。多重填补是一种可行的方法,可用于校正调查数据中患病率估计和暴露-结果关联中的错误分类偏差。