Oray Valedie, Katsanis Sara H
Initiative for Science and Society, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Mary Ann & J Milburn Smith Child Health Research, Outreach, and Advocacy Center, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Glob Bioeth. 2021 Mar 25;32(1):51-66. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2021.1896454.
As nations strengthen borders and restrict refugee admissions, national security officials are screening for fraudulent nationality claims. One tool to investigate nationality claims is DNA testing, either for claimed relationships or for ancestral origins. At the same time, the plight of global statelessness leaves millions without documentation of their nationality, and DNA testing might be the only recourse to provide evidence of heritage or relationships. DNA testing has been used sparsely to date to determine ancestral origin as a proxy for nationality but could increase as border controls tighten. Given the historic lessons in eugenics and the potential for misuse of personal genetic information, it is essential to consider the ethical parameters in order to guide the implementation of genetic data for such purposes. Here, we break down examples of the use of DNA testing for nationality, and the risks and benefits of genetic testing for this purpose. Important ethical considerations discussed include (1) empowerment of stateless individuals with evidence for citizenship proceedings; (2) imprecise correlation between genetic heritage and nationality; (3) effective protection of state interests; and (4) practicalities of DNA testing.
随着各国加强边境管控并限制难民入境,国家安全官员正在筛查虚假国籍申请。调查国籍申请的一种工具是DNA检测,用于检测声称的亲属关系或祖籍。与此同时,全球无国籍状态的困境使数百万人没有国籍文件,而DNA检测可能是提供血统或亲属关系证据的唯一途径。迄今为止,DNA检测很少被用于确定祖籍以作为国籍的替代,但随着边境管控收紧,其使用可能会增加。鉴于优生学的历史教训以及个人基因信息被滥用的可能性,必须考虑道德参数,以指导为此目的使用基因数据。在此,我们剖析了将DNA检测用于国籍认定的实例,以及为此目的进行基因检测的风险和益处。讨论的重要伦理考量包括:(1)赋予无国籍个人在公民身份程序中提供证据的权力;(2)基因血统与国籍之间的不精确关联;(3)有效保护国家利益;以及(4)DNA检测的实际操作。