Heath Laura M, Wardell Jeffrey D, Hendershot Christian S
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada.
Addict Res Theory. 2020;28(4):335-344. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2019.1653862. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
The acquired preparedness model (APM) posits that relationships between impulsivity-related traits and alcohol use are partly mediated by the biased acquisition of positive alcohol expectancies. Additionally, alcohol administration studies implicate associations between impulsivity-related traits and sensitivity to acute alcohol effects, suggesting that impulsivity-expectancy associations could be partly explained by individual differences in alcohol response. The present study assessed a theoretical extension of the APM by testing the prediction that self-reported sensitivity to alcohol would partly mediate impulsivity-expectancy relationships, and that the addition of alcohol sensitivity variables would account for increased variance in drinking quantity and problems relative to the traditional APM.
Young adult heavy drinkers (N = 300, 53% women) completed the Alcohol Sensitivity Questionnaire, the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale, and measures of alcohol expectancies (Comprehensive Effects of Alcohol Questionnaire) and drinking quantity and related problems. Hypotheses were examined using path analysis.
Results supported significant indirect effects of sensation seeking on drinking quantity and problems via higher positive expectancies. Results also supported a significant indirect effect of negative urgency on drinking problems via negative expectancies. Although alcohol sensitivity variables showed unique associations with drinking outcomes, the addition of these variables did not improve model fit and hypothesized indirect paths involving impulsivity-related traits, alcohol sensitivity, and expectancies were not supported.
Future research is necessary to reconcile these results with laboratory findings suggesting that impulsive traits are frequently associated with sensitivity to alcohol's acute effects.
习得性准备模型(APM)认为,冲动相关特质与酒精使用之间的关系部分是由对积极酒精预期的偏向性习得所介导的。此外,酒精给药研究表明冲动相关特质与对急性酒精效应的敏感性之间存在关联,这表明冲动 - 预期关联可能部分由酒精反应的个体差异来解释。本研究通过测试以下预测来评估APM的理论扩展:自我报告的酒精敏感性将部分介导冲动 - 预期关系,并且相对于传统的APM,添加酒精敏感性变量将解释饮酒量和问题方面增加的方差。
年轻成年重度饮酒者(N = 300,53%为女性)完成了酒精敏感性问卷、UPPS - P冲动行为量表、酒精预期测量(酒精综合效应问卷)以及饮酒量和相关问题的测量。使用路径分析检验假设。
结果支持了通过更高的积极预期,冒险寻求对饮酒量和问题产生显著的间接影响。结果还支持了通过消极预期,消极紧迫性对饮酒问题产生显著的间接影响。尽管酒精敏感性变量与饮酒结果显示出独特的关联,但添加这些变量并没有改善模型拟合,并且涉及冲动相关特质、酒精敏感性和预期的假设间接路径未得到支持。
未来有必要进行研究,以将这些结果与实验室研究结果相协调,实验室研究结果表明冲动特质经常与对酒精急性效应的敏感性相关。