Suppr超能文献

人类与头部无约束猴子的平稳跟踪精度比较。

Comparison of the precision of smooth pursuit in humans and head unrestrained monkeys.

作者信息

Churan Jan, Braun Doris I, Gegenfurtner Karl R, Bremmer Frank

机构信息

University of Marburg & CMBB, Marburg, Germany.

Giessen University & CMBB, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

J Eye Mov Res. 2018 Nov 9;11(4). doi: 10.16910/jemr.11.4.6.

Abstract

Direct comparison of results of humans and monkeys is often complicated by differences in experimental conditions. We replicated in head unrestrained macaques experiments of a recent study comparing human directional precision during smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) and saccades to moving targets (Braun & Gegenfurtner, 2016). Directional precision of human SPEM follows an exponential decay function reaching optimal values of 1.5°-3° within 300 ms after target motion onset, whereas precision of initial saccades to moving targets is slightly better. As in humans, we found general agreement in the devel-opment of directional precision of SPEM over time and in the differences between direc-tional precision of initial saccades and SPEM initiation. However, monkeys showed over-all lower precision in SPEM compared to humans. This was most likely due to differences in experimental conditions, such as in the stabilization of the head, which was by a chin and a head rest in human subjects and unrestrained in monkeys.

摘要

由于实验条件的差异,对人类和猴子的实验结果进行直接比较往往很复杂。我们在头部无约束的猕猴身上重复了最近一项研究的实验,该研究比较了人类在平稳跟踪眼动(SPEM)和向移动目标的扫视过程中的方向精度(Braun & Gegenfurtner,2016)。人类SPEM的方向精度遵循指数衰减函数,在目标运动开始后300毫秒内达到1.5°-3°的最佳值,而向移动目标的初始扫视精度略好。与人类一样,我们发现随着时间的推移,SPEM方向精度的发展以及初始扫视和SPEM启动的方向精度之间的差异总体上是一致的。然而,与人类相比,猴子在SPEM中的总体精度较低。这很可能是由于实验条件的差异,例如头部的稳定方式,人类受试者通过下巴和头枕来稳定头部,而猴子的头部是无约束的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7182/7904314/85e70362784a/jemr-11-04-f-figure-01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验