Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jul;30(13-14):2093-2106. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15767. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
The aims of the study were to identify content categories of unreasonable and unnecessary illegitimate tasks and to investigate how unreasonable and unnecessary tasks relate to occupational wellbeing.
Illegitimate tasks are a common stressor among healthcare professionals, and they have been shown to have negative associations with occupational well-being. Despite this evidence, research has not yet uncovered what kinds of tasks healthcare professionals consider illegitimate.
The data gathered by means of an online survey consisted of 1024 municipal healthcare organisation employees. A theory-driven qualitative content analysis was used to analyse freely reported illegitimate tasks. For occupational well-being associations, a mixed-methods approach was used (ANCOVA and linear regression analysis). The STROBE statement-checklist for cross-sectional studies was used.
Eight content categories were found for illegitimate tasks. For unreasonable tasks, these were (1) tasks outside one's occupational role (78% of all unreasonable tasks), (2) conflicting or unclear demands (9%), (3) tasks with insufficient resources (8%) and (4) tasks with difficult consequences (5%), and for unnecessary tasks, these were (1) impractical or outdated working habits (31% of all unnecessary tasks), (2) tasks related to dysfunctional technology (30%), (3) unnecessary procedures (27%) and (4) tasks related to bureaucratic demands (12%). Unreasonable and unnecessary tasks were associated with higher levels of burnout and lower work engagement and the meaningfulness of work.
Our findings support the theory that illegitimate tasks are an occupational stressor with negative effects on burnout, work engagement and meaningfulness of work.
The study offers insights into the types of tasks health care employees see as illegitimate and highlights the importance of good job design in promoting occupational well-being in health care.
本研究的目的是确定不合理和不必要的非正当任务的内容类别,并调查不合理和不必要的任务与职业幸福感的关系。
非正当任务是医疗保健专业人员常见的压力源,并且已经证明它们与职业幸福感呈负相关。尽管有这方面的证据,但研究尚未揭示医疗保健专业人员认为什么样的任务是不正当的。
通过在线调查收集的数据包括 1024 名市政医疗机构员工。使用理论驱动的定性内容分析来分析自由报告的非正当任务。对于职业幸福感的关联,采用了混合方法(ANCOVA 和线性回归分析)。使用 STROBE 声明检查表进行横断面研究。
发现了八项非正当任务的内容类别。对于不合理的任务,这些任务包括(1)超出职业角色的任务(所有不合理任务的 78%),(2)相互冲突或不明确的要求(9%),(3)资源不足的任务(8%)和(4)后果困难的任务(5%),对于不必要的任务,这些任务包括(1)不切实际或过时的工作习惯(所有不必要任务的 31%),(2)与功能失调技术相关的任务(30%),(3)不必要的程序(27%)和(4)与官僚主义要求相关的任务(12%)。不合理和不必要的任务与更高水平的倦怠、更低的工作投入和工作意义相关。
我们的研究结果支持这样一种理论,即非正当任务是一种职业压力源,对倦怠、工作投入和工作意义产生负面影响。
该研究深入了解了卫生保健员工认为非正当的任务类型,并强调了良好的工作设计在促进卫生保健职业幸福感方面的重要性。