• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整合毒性终点数据以提高化学品安全性评估的准确性:以致癌性评估为例。

Integration of data across toxicity endpoints for improved safety assessment of chemicals: the example of carcinogenicity assessment.

机构信息

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra, VA, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 2021 Jun;95(6):1971-1993. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03035-x. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00204-021-03035-x
PMID:33830278
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8166685/
Abstract

In view of the need to enhance the assessment of consumer products called for in the EU Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability, we developed a methodology for evaluating hazard by combining information across different systemic toxicity endpoints and integrating the information with new approach methodologies. This integrates mechanistic information with a view to avoiding redundant in vivo studies, minimising reliance on apical endpoint tests and ultimately devising efficient testing strategies. Here, we present the application of our methodology to carcinogenicity assessment, mapping the available information from toxicity test methods across endpoints to the key characteristics of carcinogens. Test methods are deconstructed to allow the information they provide to be organised in a systematic way, enabling the description of the toxicity mechanisms leading to the adverse outcome. This integrated approach provides a flexible and resource-efficient means of fully exploiting test methods for which test guidelines are available to fulfil regulatory requirements for systemic toxicity assessment as well as identifying where new methods can be integrated.

摘要

鉴于需要加强欧盟化学品可持续性战略中对消费品的评估,我们开发了一种通过结合不同系统毒性终点的信息并将信息与新方法整合来评估危害的方法。这将机制信息与避免重复体内研究、减少对顶极终点测试的依赖并最终设计高效测试策略结合起来。在这里,我们将我们的方法应用于致癌性评估,将来自毒性测试方法的可用信息映射到终点的致癌剂的关键特征。对测试方法进行解构,以便以系统的方式组织它们提供的信息,从而能够描述导致不良后果的毒性机制。这种综合方法为充分利用测试方法提供了一种灵活且资源高效的手段,这些测试方法有测试指南可用于满足系统毒性评估的监管要求,并确定可以整合新方法的地方。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136d/8166685/a50fbf79a3e8/204_2021_3035_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136d/8166685/3d0c1ac16392/204_2021_3035_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136d/8166685/68e4f4b72d73/204_2021_3035_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136d/8166685/1011b4ab21a9/204_2021_3035_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136d/8166685/a50fbf79a3e8/204_2021_3035_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136d/8166685/3d0c1ac16392/204_2021_3035_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136d/8166685/68e4f4b72d73/204_2021_3035_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136d/8166685/1011b4ab21a9/204_2021_3035_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136d/8166685/a50fbf79a3e8/204_2021_3035_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Integration of data across toxicity endpoints for improved safety assessment of chemicals: the example of carcinogenicity assessment.整合毒性终点数据以提高化学品安全性评估的准确性:以致癌性评估为例。
Arch Toxicol. 2021 Jun;95(6):1971-1993. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03035-x. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
2
The mouse carcinogenicity study is no longer a scientifically justifiable core data requirement for the safety assessment of pesticides.鼠致癌性研究不再是农药安全性评估的科学合理核心数据要求。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2010 Jan;40(1):35-49. doi: 10.3109/10408440903367741.
3
Integrated testing strategies for use in the EU REACH system.欧盟化学品注册、评估、授权和限制法规(REACH)体系中使用的综合测试策略。
Altern Lab Anim. 2006 Aug;34(4):407-27. doi: 10.1177/026119290603400402.
4
Consensus report on the future of animal-free systemic toxicity testing.无动物化系统性毒性测试未来的共识报告
ALTEX. 2014;31(3):341-56. doi: 10.14573/altex.1406091.
5
A Tox21 Approach to Altered Epigenetic Landscapes: Assessing Epigenetic Toxicity Pathways Leading to Altered Gene Expression and Oncogenic Transformation In Vitro.一种用于改变表观遗传格局的Tox21方法:评估导致体外基因表达改变和致癌转化的表观遗传毒性途径。
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):1179. doi: 10.3390/ijms18061179.
6
Multiple-endpoint in vitro carcinogenicity test in human cell line TK6 distinguishes carcinogens from non-carcinogens and highlights mechanisms of action.在人源细胞系 TK6 中进行的多终点体外致癌性试验可区分致癌剂和非致癌剂,并突出作用机制。
Arch Toxicol. 2021 Jan;95(1):321-336. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02902-3. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
7
Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects-2010.化妆品测试的替代(非动物)方法:现状和未来展望-2010 年。
Arch Toxicol. 2011 May;85(5):367-485. doi: 10.1007/s00204-011-0693-2. Epub 2011 May 1.
8
Is current risk assessment of non-genotoxic carcinogens protective?当前非遗传毒性致癌物的风险评估是否具有保护作用?
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018 Jul;48(6):500-511. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1458818. Epub 2018 May 10.
9
Temporal concordance between apical and transcriptional points of departure for chemical risk assessment.用于化学风险评估的起始转录点和起始化学点之间的时间一致性。
Toxicol Sci. 2013 Jul;134(1):180-94. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kft094. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
10
Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC.草甘膦的毒性与致癌性:欧盟评估的科学依据及其与国际癌症研究机构评估差异的综述
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Aug;91(8):2723-2743. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular response of to antibiotics.(此处“of”后缺少具体内容)对抗生素的分子反应。
Curr Res Toxicol. 2025 May 18;8:100239. doi: 10.1016/j.crtox.2025.100239. eCollection 2025.
2
Corrosion inhibition and toxicity assessment of imidazo[1,2-]pyrimidine-Schiff base derivatives as effective and environmentally friendly corrosion inhibitors for mild steel.咪唑并[1,2 - ]嘧啶 - 席夫碱衍生物作为低碳钢有效且环境友好型缓蚀剂的缓蚀性能及毒性评估
RSC Adv. 2025 Apr 17;15(16):12342-12363. doi: 10.1039/d5ra02000j. eCollection 2025 Apr 16.
3
Systematic evaluation of the evidence base on methyl -butyl ether supporting a lack of concern for carcinogenic hazard in humans based on animal cancer studies and mechanistic data.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards a mechanism-based approach for the prediction of nongenotoxic carcinogenic potential of agrochemicals.迈向基于机制的方法,用于预测农药的非遗传毒性致癌潜力。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2020 Oct;50(9):725-739. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2020.1841732. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
2
Optimising testing strategies for classification of human health and environmental hazards - A proof-of-concept study.优化人类健康和环境危害分类的测试策略——概念验证研究。
Toxicol Lett. 2020 Dec 15;335:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
3
A comprehensive view on mechanistic approaches for cancer risk assessment of non-genotoxic agrochemicals.
基于动物癌症研究和机制数据,对甲基丁基醚证据库进行系统评估,以支持对其在人类中致癌风险无需担忧的观点。
Curr Res Toxicol. 2025 Feb 16;8:100224. doi: 10.1016/j.crtox.2025.100224. eCollection 2025.
4
Assessing human carcinogenicity risk of agrochemicals without the rodent cancer bioassay.在不进行啮齿动物癌症生物测定的情况下评估农用化学品对人类的致癌风险。
Front Toxicol. 2024 Jun 12;6:1394361. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1394361. eCollection 2024.
5
Evaluation of weak genotoxicity of hydroxychloroquine in human TK6 cells.羟氯喹在人TK6细胞中的弱遗传毒性评估。
Toxicol Lett. 2024 Mar;393:84-95. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
6
New approach methodologies to facilitate and improve the hazard assessment of non-genotoxic carcinogens-a PARC project.促进和改进非遗传毒性致癌物危害评估的新方法学——一项PARC项目
Front Toxicol. 2023 Jul 10;5:1220998. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1220998. eCollection 2023.
7
Digital Transformation in Toxicology: Improving Communication and Efficiency in Risk Assessment.毒理学中的数字转型:提高风险评估中的沟通与效率
ACS Omega. 2023 Jun 8;8(24):21377-21390. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00596. eCollection 2023 Jun 20.
8
Towards a future regulatory framework for chemicals in the European Union - Chemicals 2.0.迈向欧盟化学品监管框架的未来——化学品 2.0。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Aug;142:105431. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105431. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
9
A New Interpretation of Relative Importance on an Analysis of Per and Polyfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) Exposures on Bone Mineral Density.全氟及多氟烷基物质(PFAS)暴露对骨密度影响分析中相对重要性的新解释
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 3;20(5):4539. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054539.
10
A framework for establishing scientific confidence in new approach methodologies.建立新方法学科学置信度的框架。
Arch Toxicol. 2022 Nov;96(11):2865-2879. doi: 10.1007/s00204-022-03365-4. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
非遗传毒性农药致癌风险评估的机制方法的综合观点。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;118:104789. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104789. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
4
Screening of repeated dose toxicity data in safety evaluation reports of cosmetic ingredients issued by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety between 2009 and 2019.2009 年至 2019 年期间,消费者安全科学委员会发布的化妆品成分安全评估报告中重复剂量毒性数据的筛选。
Arch Toxicol. 2020 Nov;94(11):3723-3735. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02868-2. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
5
Making better use of toxicity studies for human health by extrapolating across endpoints.通过跨终点外推,更好地利用毒性研究以保护人类健康。
ALTEX. 2020 Jul 28;37(4):519-531. doi: 10.14573/altex.2005061.
6
Guidance for the identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EU) No 528/2012 and (EC) No 1107/2009.关于在(欧盟)第528/2012号法规和(欧盟)第1107/2009号法规背景下识别内分泌干扰物的指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Jun 7;16(6):e05311. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5311. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
Chemical carcinogen safety testing: OECD expert group international consensus on the development of an integrated approach for the testing and assessment of chemical non-genotoxic carcinogens.化学致癌物安全测试:OECD 专家组关于开发化学非遗传毒性致癌物测试和评估综合方法的国际共识。
Arch Toxicol. 2020 Aug;94(8):2899-2923. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02784-5. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
8
Identifying and Characterizing Stress Pathways of Concern for Consumer Safety in Next-Generation Risk Assessment.在下一代风险评估中识别并表征关乎消费者安全的应激途径。
Toxicol Sci. 2020 Jul 1;176(1):11-33. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaa054.
9
A Next-Generation Risk Assessment Case Study for Coumarin in Cosmetic Products.化妆品中香豆素的下一代风险评估案例研究。
Toxicol Sci. 2020 Jul 1;176(1):236-252. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaa048.
10
The Key Characteristics of Carcinogens: Relationship to the Hallmarks of Cancer, Relevant Biomarkers, and Assays to Measure Them.致癌物的关键特征:与癌症相关的标志物、相关生物标志物及其检测方法的关系。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Oct;29(10):1887-1903. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1346. Epub 2020 Mar 9.