• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赞比亚住院患者发生谵妄的危险因素。

Risk factors for delirium among hospitalized patients in Zambia.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249097. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0249097
PMID:33831010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8031188/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for delirium among hospitalized patients in Zambia.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study at the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia, from October 2017 to April 2018. We report associations of exposures including sociodemographic and clinical factors with delirium over the first three days of hospital admission, assessed using a modified Brief Confusion Assessment Method (bCAM).

FINDINGS

749 patients were included for analysis (mean age, 42.9 years; 64.8% men; 47.3% with HIV). In individual regression analyses of potential delirium risk factors adjusted for age, sex and education, factors significantly associated with delirium included being divorced/widowed (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.09-2.47), lowest tercile income (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.04-2.40), informal employment (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.25-3.15), untreated HIV infection (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.21-4.06), unknown HIV status (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.47-6.16), history of stroke (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.15-7.19), depression/anxiety (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.08-2.14), alcohol overuse (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.39-2.79), sedatives ordered on admission (OR 3.77, 95% CI 1.70-9.54), severity of illness (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.82-2.22), neurological (OR 7.66, 95% CI 4.90-12.24) and pulmonary-system admission diagnoses (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.29-2.85), and sepsis (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.51-4.08). After combining significant risk factors into a multivariable regression analysis, severity of illness, history of stroke, and being divorced/widowed remained predictive of delirium (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Among hospitalized adults at a national referral hospital in Zambia, severity of illness, history of stroke, and being divorced/widowed were independently predictive of delirium. Extension of this work will inform future efforts to prevent, detect, and manage delirium in low- and middle-income countries.

摘要

目的

确定赞比亚住院患者发生谵妄的风险因素。

方法

我们在赞比亚卢萨卡的教学医院进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,时间为 2017 年 10 月至 2018 年 4 月。我们使用改良的Brief Confusion Assessment Method(bCAM)评估了在入院后的头三天内与谵妄相关的暴露因素,包括社会人口统计学和临床因素。

结果

共纳入 749 例患者进行分析(平均年龄 42.9 岁;64.8%为男性;47.3%感染了 HIV)。在调整年龄、性别和教育程度的潜在谵妄风险因素的个体回归分析中,与谵妄显著相关的因素包括离婚/丧偶(OR 1.64,95%CI 1.09-2.47)、收入最低三分之一(OR 1.58,95%CI 1.04-2.40)、非正规就业(OR 1.97,95%CI 1.25-3.15)、未经治疗的 HIV 感染(OR 2.18,95%CI 1.21-4.06)、HIV 状态未知(OR 2.90,95%CI 1.47-6.16)、中风史(OR 2.70,95%CI 1.15-7.19)、抑郁/焦虑(OR 1.52,95%CI 1.08-2.14)、酒精过度使用(OR 1.96,95%CI 1.39-2.79)、入院时开镇静剂(OR 3.77,95%CI 1.70-9.54)、疾病严重程度(OR 2.00,95%CI 1.82-2.22)、神经(OR 7.66,95%CI 4.90-12.24)和肺部系统入院诊断(OR 1.91,95%CI 1.29-2.85),以及脓毒症(OR 2.44,95%CI 1.51-4.08)。将显著的风险因素结合到多变量回归分析中后,疾病严重程度、中风史和离婚/丧偶仍然是谵妄的预测因素(p<0.05)。

结论

在赞比亚一家国立转诊医院的住院成年患者中,疾病严重程度、中风史和离婚/丧偶与谵妄独立相关。这项工作的扩展将为预防、发现和管理低收入和中等收入国家的谵妄提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a298/8031188/eeb38dc0ab44/pone.0249097.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a298/8031188/4bfc775b36e0/pone.0249097.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a298/8031188/eeb38dc0ab44/pone.0249097.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a298/8031188/4bfc775b36e0/pone.0249097.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a298/8031188/eeb38dc0ab44/pone.0249097.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors for delirium among hospitalized patients in Zambia.赞比亚住院患者发生谵妄的危险因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249097. eCollection 2021.
2
Delirium as a predictor of mortality and disability among hospitalized patients in Zambia.赞比亚住院患者谵妄与死亡率和失能相关。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246330. eCollection 2021.
3
Risk factors for developing delirium in older patients admitted to general medical wards.入住综合内科病房的老年患者发生谵妄的危险因素。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Feb;94 Suppl 1:S99-104.
4
Association between delirium superimposed on dementia and mortality in hospitalized older adults: A prospective cohort study.老年住院患者中痴呆叠加谵妄与死亡率的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Mar 28;14(3):e1002264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002264. eCollection 2017 Mar.
5
Poststroke delirium incidence and outcomes: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU).卒中后谵妄的发生率和结局:重症监护病房意识模糊评估方法(CAM-ICU)的验证。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):484-90. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da12.
6
Frailty and Geriatric Syndromes in Vascular Surgical Ward Patients.血管外科病房患者的衰弱与老年综合征
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Aug;35:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.01.033. Epub 2016 May 27.
7
"Delirium Day": a nationwide point prevalence study of delirium in older hospitalized patients using an easy standardized diagnostic tool.“谵妄日”:一项使用简易标准化诊断工具对老年住院患者谵妄进行的全国性现况研究
BMC Med. 2016 Jul 18;14:106. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0649-8.
8
Development and Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning Model to Estimate Delirium Risk in Newly Hospitalized Patients Without Known Cognitive Impairment.基于电子病历的机器学习模型开发与验证:用于预测无已知认知障碍的新入院患者发生谵妄的风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181018. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1018.
9
Long-Term Mental Health Problems After Delirium in the ICU.重症监护病房谵妄后的长期心理健康问题
Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):1808-13. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001861.
10
Delirium in hospitalized older persons: outcomes and predictors.住院老年人的谵妄:结局与预测因素
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Aug;42(8):809-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06551.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Delirium as a predictor of mortality and disability among hospitalized patients in Zambia.赞比亚住院患者谵妄与死亡率和失能相关。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246330. eCollection 2021.
2
Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、地区和国家脓毒症发病率和死亡率,1990-2017 年:全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
3
Postoperative delirium in critically ill surgical patients: incidence, risk factors, and predictive scores.
术后危重病手术患者的意识混乱:发生率、危险因素和预测评分。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Mar 20;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0694-x.
4
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU.成人 ICU 患者疼痛、躁动/镇静、谵妄、活动减少、睡眠障碍预防与管理临床实践指南。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
5
Critical care outcomes in resource-limited settings.资源有限环境下的重症监护结局。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018 Oct;24(5):421-427. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000528.
6
Clinical phenotypes of delirium during critical illness and severity of subsequent long-term cognitive impairment: a prospective cohort study.危重病期间谵妄的临床表型与随后长期认知障碍的严重程度:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Mar;6(3):213-222. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30062-6.
7
Derivation and validation of a universal vital assessment (UVA) score: a tool for predicting mortality in adult hospitalised patients in sub-Saharan Africa.通用生命评估(UVA)评分的推导与验证:一种预测撒哈拉以南非洲地区成年住院患者死亡率的工具。
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Jul 28;2(2):e000344. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000344. eCollection 2017.
8
Risk Factors for Delirium in Older Medical Inpatients in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚老年内科住院患者谵妄的危险因素
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;44(3-4):160-170. doi: 10.1159/000479058. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
9
The ABCDEF Bundle in Critical Care.重症监护中的ABCDEF集束化护理
Crit Care Clin. 2017 Apr;33(2):225-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2016.12.005.
10
Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department.Sepsis-3 标准对急诊科疑似感染患者住院死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):301-308. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20329.