Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, CEPR, and CESifo, Frankfurt, Germany.
University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249732. eCollection 2021.
While most countries imposed a lockdown in response to the first wave of COVID-19 infections, Sweden did not. To quantify the lockdown effect, we approximate a counterfactual lockdown scenario for Sweden through the outcome in a synthetic control unit. We find, first, that a 9-week lockdown in the first half of 2020 would have reduced infections and deaths by about 75% and 38%, respectively. Second, the lockdown effect starts to materialize with a delay of 3-4 weeks only. Third, the actual adjustment of mobility patterns in Sweden suggests there has been substantial voluntary social restraint, although the adjustment was less strong than under the lockdown scenario. Lastly, we find that a lockdown would not have caused much additional output loss.
虽然大多数国家为应对 COVID-19 感染的第一波疫情而实施了封锁,但瑞典没有。为了量化封锁的效果,我们通过合成对照组的结果来近似模拟瑞典的反事实封锁情况。我们发现,首先,2020 年上半年实施为期 9 周的封锁,将分别减少约 75%和 38%的感染和死亡人数。其次,封锁效果仅滞后 3-4 周就开始显现。第三,瑞典实际调整流动性模式表明存在大量自愿的社会限制,尽管这种调整不如封锁情况下那么强烈。最后,我们发现封锁不会造成太多额外的产出损失。