Interdisciplinary Centre on Population Dynamics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 31;13(1):18745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45934-2.
In March 2020, in an attempt to slow the spread of Covid-19, several countries intervened by imposing strict lockdown measures that limited contact among people. In contrast, Sweden decided to not implement a mandatory lockdown and instead allowed people free choice on whether or not to follow the government recommendation to limit contact with others. Using the Synthetic Control Method, we estimate the causal effect of not implementing a mandatory lockdown in Sweden in the period from the end of February 2020 to the end of September 2020, a time when vaccines were as yet not available. We find that not imposing a mandatory lockdown resulted in a lower reduction of mobility and a substantial increase in mortality. Our results indicates that up to about 4411 of the 46554 deaths registered in Sweden during this period could have been avoided had Sweden implemented a mandatory lockdown. These results remain consistent when using two additional state-of-the-art estimation methods; the augmented synthetic control method and synthetic difference-in-difference.
2020 年 3 月,为了减缓 COVID-19 的传播,一些国家采取了严格的封锁措施限制人与人之间的接触。相比之下,瑞典决定不实施强制性封锁,而是允许人们自由选择是否遵循政府限制与他人接触的建议。我们使用合成控制法估计了在 2020 年 2 月底至 9 月底期间瑞典不实施强制性封锁的因果效应,当时还没有疫苗。我们发现,不实施强制性封锁导致流动性下降幅度较小,死亡率大幅上升。我们的结果表明,如果瑞典实施了强制性封锁,在此期间登记的瑞典 46554 例死亡中,多达 4411 例可能本可以避免。当使用另外两种最先进的估计方法,即增强型合成控制法和合成差分法时,这些结果仍然一致。