• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国人口研究结构和过程对断指再植结果的影响。

National Population Study of the Effect of Structure and Process on Outcomes of Digit Replantation.

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, the College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Section of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jun;232(6):900-909.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.03.018
PMID:33831540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10167636/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgeon experience, hospital volume, and teaching hospital status may play a role in the success of digit replantation. This study aims to analyze factors that influence digit replantation success rates.

STUDY DESIGN

We examined patients with traumatic digit amputations, between 2000 and 2015, from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan, which comprises data of more than 99% of its population. We measured the number of traumatic digit amputations and success rate of replantation. Chi-square and ANOVA tests were used for descriptive statistics. Regression models were built to analyze the association among patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics, and replant success.

RESULTS

We identified 13,416 digit replantation patients using the eligibility criteria. The overall replantation failure rate was significantly higher in medium- and high-volume hospitals (low-volume: 11%, medium-volume: 17%, and high-volume: 15%, p < 0.001). Teaching hospitals had significantly higher replantation failure rates [(15.5% vs 7.6%), odds ratio (OR) 2.0; confidence interval (CI) 1.1-3.7]. Lower surgeon case volume resulted in a significantly higher failure rate in the thumb replantation (OR 0.89; CI 0.85-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Teaching hospitals had greater odds of replantation failure, owing to being high volume centers and attempting more replantations. However, the effect of residents performing the replantation during their training should be considered. Teaching units are mandatory for resident training; however, a balance should be established to provide training, but with sufficient supervision to achieve optimal replant success. A national protocol to triage digit amputation cases to high volume centers with experienced microsurgeons will help improve the replantation success rate.

摘要

背景

外科医生经验、医院容量和教学医院地位可能在断指再植的成功中发挥作用。本研究旨在分析影响断指再植成功率的因素。

研究设计

我们从台湾全民健康保险研究数据库(NHIRD)中检查了 2000 年至 2015 年期间因创伤性断指的患者,该数据库包含其超过 99%的人口的数据。我们测量了创伤性断指的数量和再植的成功率。使用卡方检验和方差分析进行描述性统计。回归模型用于分析患者、外科医生和医院特征与再植成功之间的关系。

结果

我们使用合格标准确定了 13416 例断指再植患者。中高容量医院的整体再植失败率明显较高(低容量:11%,中容量:17%,高容量:15%,p < 0.001)。教学医院的再植失败率明显更高[(15.5%比 7.6%),优势比(OR)2.0;置信区间(CI)1.1-3.7]。较低的外科医生手术量导致拇指再植的失败率明显更高(OR 0.89;CI 0.85-0.94)。

结论

教学医院的再植失败率更高,这是由于它们是大容量中心并尝试进行更多的再植。然而,应该考虑到住院医师在培训期间进行再植的效果。教学单位是住院医师培训的强制性要求;但是,应该建立平衡,既要提供培训,又要进行充分的监督,以实现最佳的再植成功率。将断指病例分诊到有经验的显微外科医生的高容量中心的全国方案将有助于提高再植成功率。

相似文献

1
National Population Study of the Effect of Structure and Process on Outcomes of Digit Replantation.全国人口研究结构和过程对断指再植结果的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jun;232(6):900-909.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
2
Finger Replantation Optimization Study (FRONT): Update on National Trends.手指再植优化研究(FRONT):全国趋势更新
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Oct;43(10):903-912.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.07.021.
3
A nationwide review of the treatment patterns of traumatic thumb amputations.一项关于创伤性拇指截肢治疗模式的全国性综述。
Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Jun;70(6):647-51. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31828986c9.
4
The impact of hospital, surgeon, and patient characteristics on digit replantation decision: A national population study.医院、外科医生和患者特征对断指再植决策的影响:一项全国性的人群研究。
Injury. 2020 Nov;51(11):2532-2540. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.024. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
5
Safety and Suitability of Finger Replantations as a Residency Training Procedure: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Analysis of the Initial Postoperative Outcomes.手指再植作为住院医师培训操作的安全性和适用性:一项对术后初始结果进行分析的回顾性队列研究
Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Apr;78(4):431-435. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000945.
6
Digit replantation: experience of two U.S. academic level-I trauma centers.断指再植:两家美国一级创伤中心的经验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Dec 4;95(23):2127-34. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01219.
7
Annual Hospital Volume and Success of Digital Replantation.年度医院手术量与断指再植成功率
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Mar;139(3):672-680. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003087.
8
Association of Interfacility Transfer and Patient and Hospital Characteristics With Thumb Replantation After Traumatic Amputation.医疗机构间转移与患者及医院特征对创伤性断指再植术后拇指再造的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036297. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36297.
9
Emergency Department Wait Time and Treatment of Traumatic Digit Amputation: Do Race and Insurance Matter?急诊科等待时间与外伤性手指离断伤的治疗:种族和保险类型有影响吗?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Feb;139(2):444e-454e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002936.
10
The Detrimental Effect of Decentralization in Digital Replantation in the United States: 15 Years of Evidence From the National Inpatient Sample.美国数字再植中去中心化的有害影响:来自全国住院患者样本的15年证据
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 May;41(5):593-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and external validation of a prediction model for digit replantation failure after traumatic amputations based on a prospective multicenter cohort.基于前瞻性多中心队列的创伤性截肢后指尖再植失败预测模型的建立与外部验证。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2701-2707. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001145.
2
Indications for replantation and factors that predict success.再植的适应证和预测成功的因素。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Oct;34(7):3661-3668. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03671-2. Epub 2023 Aug 18.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of hospital, surgeon, and patient characteristics on digit replantation decision: A national population study.医院、外科医生和患者特征对断指再植决策的影响:一项全国性的人群研究。
Injury. 2020 Nov;51(11):2532-2540. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.024. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
2
Hospital-Owned Apps in Taiwan: Nationwide Survey.台湾地区医院自有应用程序:全国性调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 16;6(1):e22. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8636.
3
The Associations of Hospital Volume, Surgeon Volume, and Surgeon Experience with Complications and 30-Day Rehospitalization after Free Tissue Transfer: A National Population Study.
医院手术量、外科医生手术量及外科医生经验与游离组织移植术后并发症和30天再入院率的相关性:一项全国性人群研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Aug;140(2):403-411. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003515.
4
Annual Hospital Volume and Success of Digital Replantation.年度医院手术量与断指再植成功率
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Mar;139(3):672-680. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003087.
5
Effect of Hospital Volume on Success of Thumb Replantation.医院手术量对拇指再植成功率的影响
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Feb;42(2):96-103.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.11.020. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
6
Evaluating the Effect of Comorbidities on the Success, Risk, and Cost of Digital Replantation.评估合并症对数字再植成功率、风险和成本的影响。
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Dec;41(12):1145-1152.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
7
Racial Variation in Treatment of Traumatic Finger/Thumb Amputation: A National Comparative Study of Replantation and Revision Amputation.创伤性手指/拇指离断治疗中的种族差异:一项关于再植和截肢修正术的全国性比较研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar;137(3):576e-585e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000479969.14557.9d.
8
A Systematic Review of Topical Vasodilators for the Treatment of Intraoperative Vasospasm in Reconstructive Microsurgery.用于治疗显微重建手术中术中血管痉挛的局部血管扩张剂的系统评价
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Aug;136(2):411-422. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001431.
9
Digit replantation: experience of two U.S. academic level-I trauma centers.断指再植:两家美国一级创伤中心的经验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Dec 4;95(23):2127-34. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01219.
10
Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.美国外科医生手术量与手术死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 27;349(22):2117-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa035205.