Beck Ben, Perkins Monica, Olivier Jake, Chong Derek, Johnson Marilyn
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Laval, Quebec, Canada.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC, Australia.
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jun;155:106102. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106102. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
Feeling unsafe when riding a bicycle is a key barrier to cycling participation. To better understand the experiences of cycling on-road, this study aimed to explore the relationship between cyclists' subjective experiences and the lateral passing distance of motor vehicles.
An on-road observational study was conducted in Victoria, Australia. Participants had a custom device installed on their bicycle that measured the lateral passing distance of motor vehicles and included a handlebar mounted "panic button" that participants could press when they felt that a passing event was too close or unsafe. A random effects logistic regression model was used to investigate the relationship between cyclist sex, motor vehicle type and infrastructure characteristics, and button press events.
A total of 217 button press events were recorded (1.2 % of all passing events) from 60 participants. For events with a passing distance closer than 100 cm, 10.4 % of these events had a recorded button press. The adjusted odds of a button press event were over three-fold higher when the rider was passed by a truck, compared to when the rider was passed by a sedan. The predicted probability of a button press event was higher in events occurring in road environments with no bike lane and no parked cars (1.9 %) compared to no bike lane with parked cars (1.2 %), a bike lane with no parked cars (0.9 %) and a bike lane with parked cars (0.7 %).
The study identified important links between cyclists' subjective experience of unsafe events, motor vehicle types and infrastructure characteristics. Greater emphasis needs to be placed on capturing subjective experiences to inform and advance the development and implementation of safe and comfortable cycling infrastructure.
骑自行车时感到不安全是阻碍人们参与骑行活动的关键因素。为了更好地了解在道路上骑行的体验,本研究旨在探讨骑车人的主观体验与机动车横向超车距离之间的关系。
在澳大利亚维多利亚州进行了一项道路观察研究。参与者的自行车上安装了一个定制设备,用于测量机动车的横向超车距离,该设备还包括一个安装在车把上的“紧急按钮”,当参与者感觉超车事件过于靠近或不安全时可以按下该按钮。采用随机效应逻辑回归模型来研究骑车人性别、机动车类型和基础设施特征与按钮按下事件之间的关系。
60名参与者共记录了217次按钮按下事件(占所有超车事件的1.2%)。对于超车距离小于100厘米的事件,其中10.4%的事件有按钮按下记录。与轿车超车相比,当骑车人被卡车超车时,按钮按下事件的调整后优势比高出三倍多。与有自行车道且有停放车辆(1.2%)、有自行车道但无停放车辆(0.9%)以及无自行车道但有停放车辆(1.2%)的道路环境相比,在没有自行车道且没有停放车辆的道路环境中发生的事件中,按钮按下事件的预测概率更高(1.9%)。
该研究确定了骑车人对不安全事件的主观体验、机动车类型和基础设施特征之间的重要联系。需要更加重视捕捉主观体验,以为安全舒适的自行车基础设施的开发和实施提供信息并推动其发展。