Canadian Sport Institute - Pacific, Victoria, Canada.
Exercise Science, Physical & Health Education, University of Victoria British Columbia, Victoria, Canada.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 May;22(5):709-719. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1915391. Epub 2021 May 3.
Decades of laboratory research have shown impairments to several body systems after only 4-5 days of strictly controlled consistent low energy availability (LEA); where energy availability (EA) = Energy Intake (EI) - Exercise Energy Expenditure (EEE)/Fat-Free Mass. Meanwhile, cross-sectional reports exist on the interrelatedness of LEA, menstrual dysfunction and impaired bone health in females (the Female Athlete Triad). These findings have demonstrated that LEA is the key underpinning factor behind a broader set of health and performance outcomes, recently termed as Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S). There is utmost importance of early screening and diagnosis of RED-S to avoid the development of severe negative health and performance outcomes. However, a significant gap exists between short-term laboratory studies and cross-sectional reports, or clinically field-based situations, of long-term/chronic LEA and no definitive, validated diagnostic tests for RED-S exist. This review aims to highlight methodological challenges related to the assessment of the components of EA equation in the field (e.g. challenges with EI and EEE measures). Due to the uncertainty of these parameters, we propose the use of more chronic "objective" markers of LEA (i.e. blood markers). However, we note that direct extrapolations of laboratory-based outcomes into the field are likely to be problematic due to potentially poor ecological validity and the extreme variability in most athlete's daily EI and EEE. Therefore, we provide a critical appraisal of the scientific literature, highlighting research gaps, and a potential set of leading objective RED-S markers while working in the field. HighlightsDirect application of short-term laboratory-based findings in the field is problematic.Calculation of energy availability (EA) in the field is methodologically challenging and prone to errors.The use of several biomarkers may allow the detection of early exposure to low EA in the female athlete.
几十年的实验室研究表明,仅在严格控制的一致低能量供应 (LEA) 4-5 天后,几个身体系统就会受到损害;其中能量供应 (EA)=能量摄入 (EI)-运动能量消耗 (EEE)/去脂体重。同时,横断面报告存在 LEA、月经功能障碍和女性骨骼健康受损(女性运动员三联征)之间的相关性。这些发现表明,LEA 是一系列更广泛的健康和表现结果的关键基础因素,最近被称为运动中的相对能量不足 (RED-S)。早期筛查和诊断 RED-S 非常重要,以避免严重的负面健康和表现结果的发生。然而,短期实验室研究与横断面报告之间存在显著差距,或者长期/慢性 LEA 的临床现场情况之间存在显著差距,并且没有针对 RED-S 的明确、经过验证的诊断测试。本综述旨在强调评估 EA 方程在现场的各个组成部分(例如 EI 和 EEE 测量)时相关的方法学挑战。由于这些参数的不确定性,我们建议使用更慢性的“客观”LEA 标志物(即血液标志物)。然而,我们注意到,由于潜在的生态有效性差和大多数运动员日常 EI 和 EEE 的极端可变性,将实验室结果直接推断到现场可能会出现问题。因此,我们对科学文献进行了批判性评估,强调了研究差距,并提出了一组潜在的主要客观 RED-S 标志物,同时在现场工作。要点直接将短期实验室发现应用于现场存在问题。现场计算能量供应 (EA) 在方法学上具有挑战性,容易出错。使用多种生物标志物可能有助于检测女性运动员早期接触低 EA。