Suppr超能文献

从收入不平等到社会不公平:对国际效率比较小组中健康水平的影响。

From income inequality to social inequity: impact on health levels in an international efficiency comparison panel.

机构信息

Department of Policies, Management and Health, Faculdade de Saúde Pública - FSP (School of Public Health), Universidade de São Paulo - USP (Sao Paulo University), Av. Dr. Arnaldo 715, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 01246-904, Brazil.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;21(1):688. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10395-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health equity, although addressed in several publications dealing with health efficiency analysis, is not easily translated into the operationalization of variables, mainly due to technical difficulties. Some studies provide evidence that it does not influence health outcomes; others demonstrate that its effect is an indirect one, with the hegemony of material living conditions over its social connotation. The aim of this article is to evaluate the role of health equity in determining health outcomes, in an international comparative analysis of the effectiveness and efficiency of health systems.

METHOD

Fixed Effects Model Panel and Data Envelopment Analysis, a dynamic and network model, in addition to comparative analysis between methods and health impacts. The effect variables considered in the study were life expectancy at birth and infant mortality, in 2010 and 2015, according to the sociocultural regions of the selected countries. Inequity was assessed both economically and socially. The following dimensions were considered: physical and financial resources, health production (access, coverage and prevention) and intersectoral variables: demographic, socioeconomic, governance and health risks.

RESULTS

Both methods demonstrated that countries with higher inequity levels (regarding income, education and health dimensions), associated or not with poverty, are the least efficient, not reaching the potential for effective health outcomes. The outcome life expectancy at birth exhibited, in the final model, the following variables: social inequity and per capita health expenditure. The outcome infant mortality comprehended the level of education variable, in association with the following healthcare variabels: care seeking due to diarrhea in children under five, births attended by skilled health professionals and the reduction in the incidence of HIV.

CONCLUSION

The dissociation between the distribution of health outcomes and the overall level of health of the population characterizes a devastating political choice for society, as it is associated with high levels of segregation, disrespect and violence from within. Countries should prioritize health equity, adding value to its resources, since health inequties affect society altogether, generating mistrust and reduced social cohesion.

摘要

背景

尽管在一些涉及卫生效率分析的出版物中都提到了卫生公平性,但由于技术上的困难,它不易转化为变量的操作化,一些研究表明它不会影响健康结果;另一些研究则表明,它的影响是间接的,物质生活条件对其社会内涵具有主导性。本文旨在评估卫生公平性在决定健康结果方面的作用,在卫生系统有效性和效率的国际比较分析中。

方法

固定效应模型面板和数据包络分析,一种动态和网络模型,除了方法和健康影响之间的比较分析。该研究考虑的效应变量包括 2010 年和 2015 年按所选国家社会文化区域划分的出生时预期寿命和婴儿死亡率。不平等性从经济和社会两个方面进行评估。考虑了以下维度:物质和财政资源、卫生生产(获得、覆盖和预防)以及部门间变量:人口、社会经济、治理和卫生风险。

结果

这两种方法都表明,收入、教育和卫生维度不平等程度较高(无论是否与贫困相关)的国家效率最低,无法实现有效健康结果的潜力。出生时预期寿命的结果在最终模型中显示了以下变量:社会不平等和人均卫生支出。婴儿死亡率的结果包括教育水平变量,与以下医疗保健变量相关联:五岁以下儿童腹泻的就医、熟练卫生专业人员接生和艾滋病毒发病率降低。

结论

卫生结果的分布与人口的整体健康水平之间的分离是社会毁灭性的政治选择,因为它与高水平的隔离、不尊重和内部暴力有关。各国应优先考虑卫生公平性,增加其资源的附加值,因为卫生不平等会影响整个社会,导致不信任和社会凝聚力下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2825/8033748/56326a257298/12889_2021_10395_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验