Gilgur Alexander, Ramirez-Marquez Jose Emmanuel
Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, United States of America.
Socioecon Plann Sci. 2022 Dec;84:101397. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101397. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, most US states have taken measures of varying strength, enforcing social and physical distancing in the interest of public safety. These measures have enabled counties and states, with varying success, to slow down the propagation and mortality of the disease by matching the propagation rate to the capacity of medical facilities. However, each state's government was making its decisions based on limited information and without the benefit of being able to look retrospectively at the problem at large and to analyze the commonalities and the differences among the states and the counties across the country. We developed models connecting people's mobility, socioeconomic, and demographic factors with severity of the COVID pandemic in the US at the County level. These models can be used to inform policymakers and other stakeholders on measures to be taken during a pandemic. They also enable in-depth analysis of factors affecting the relationship between mobility and the severity of the disease. With the exception of one model, that of COVID recovery time, the resulting models accurately predict the vulnerability and severity metrics and rank the explanatory variables in the order of statistical importance. We also analyze and explain why recovery time did not allow for a good model.
在新冠疫情期间,美国大多数州都采取了力度各异的措施,为了公共安全实施社交和物理距离措施。这些措施使得各县和各州不同程度地成功减缓了疾病的传播和死亡率,方法是使传播速度与医疗设施的能力相匹配。然而,每个州的政府都是基于有限的信息做出决策,且无法从宏观角度回顾性地审视这个问题,也无法分析全国各州及各县之间的共性和差异。我们开发了一些模型,将人们的流动性、社会经济和人口因素与美国县级层面的新冠疫情严重程度联系起来。这些模型可用于为政策制定者和其他利益相关者提供有关疫情期间应采取措施的信息。它们还能对影响流动性与疾病严重程度之间关系的因素进行深入分析。除了一个模型,即新冠恢复时间模型外,所得出的模型能够准确预测脆弱性和严重程度指标,并按统计重要性顺序对解释变量进行排序。我们还分析并解释了为何恢复时间无法得出一个良好的模型。