• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Modified team-based and blended learning perception: a cohort study among medical students at King Saud University.基于团队的和混合学习感知的改进:沙特国王大学医学生队列研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 8;21(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02639-2.
2
Enhancement of Medical Students' Performance and Motivation in Pathophysiology Courses: Shifting From Traditional Instruction to Blended Learning.将医学专业学术文献翻译为简体中文
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 26;9:813577. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.813577. eCollection 2021.
3
[Assessment of a newly-implemented blended teaching of intensive care and emergency medicine at Paris-Diderot University].[巴黎狄德罗大学重症监护与急诊医学新实施的混合式教学评估]
Rev Med Interne. 2020 Jun;41(6):368-374. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2019.12.021. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
4
[Chances and challenges of increasing digitalization of teaching in the discipline anesthesiology from the perspective of students].从学生视角看麻醉学专业教学日益数字化的机遇与挑战
Anaesthesiologie. 2022 Sep;71(9):689-696. doi: 10.1007/s00101-022-01102-1. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
5
A model for the use of blended learning in large group teaching sessions.混合式学习在大班教学中的应用模式。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 9;17(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1057-2.
6
Can blended learning and the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction in Saudi Arabia?混合式学习和翻转课堂能否提高沙特阿拉伯学生的学习效果和满意度?
Int J Med Educ. 2016 Sep 4;7:281-5. doi: 10.5116/ijme.57a7.83d4.
7
Students' Engagement in and Perceptions of Blended Learning in a Clinical Module in a Veterinary Degree Program.学生对兽医学位课程临床模块中混合式学习的参与度和看法。
J Vet Med Educ. 2021 Apr;48(2):181-195. doi: 10.3138/jvme.2019-0018. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
8
Surface and deep learning: a blended learning approach in preclinical years of medical school.表面和深度学习:医学院临床前阶段的混合学习方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1029. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05963-5.
9
Perception of online and face to face microbiology laboratory sessions among medical students and faculty at Arabian Gulf University: a mixed method study.《海湾阿拉伯大学生医学生和教师对线上和线下微生物学实验室课程的感知:混合方法研究》
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 30;22(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03346-2.
10
Impact of blended learning on learning outcomes in the public healthcare education course: a review of flipped classroom with team-based learning.混合式学习对公共卫生教育培训课程学习成果的影响:翻转课堂结合团队学习的回顾。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 28;21(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02508-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing and Assessing an Integrated Comprehensive Obstetric Ultrasound Training Program for Undergraduate Medical Students - the Fetal Assessment in Medical Education Study (FAME study).为本科医学生制定并评估综合全面的产科超声培训计划——医学教育中的胎儿评估研究(FAME研究)。
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2025 Mar 3;85(9):976-986. doi: 10.1055/a-2531-2707. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Evaluation of Mobile Apps Used among Medical Students for Learning and Education: A Mixed-Method Concurrent Triangulation Approach.评估医学生用于学习和教育的移动应用程序:混合方法同步三角测量方法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Aug;15(4):717-726. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788332. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
3
The effect of modified team-based learning method on the knowledge and skills of medical emergency personnel: a clinical trial.改良团队式学习方法对医疗急救人员知识与技能的影响:一项临床试验
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Jun 4;86(8):4505-4511. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002219. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
"I really liked the chance to talk about it": Students' Reflections on the Process of Completing Paper Puzzles, a Novel Active Learning Activity.“我真的很喜欢有机会谈论这个话题”:学生对完成纸质拼图这一新型主动学习活动过程的反思。
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Nov 17;32(6):1503-1511. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01682-y. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Perceptions of distance learning among Al-Qunfudhah medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间库夫达哈医科学生对远程学习的看法。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2022 Jun;17(3):516-522. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Influencing Medical Students' Experiences and Satisfaction with Blended Integrated E-Learning.影响医学生混合式整合电子学习体验和满意度的因素。
Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(4):396-402. doi: 10.1159/000505210. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
2
A tailored e-learning gives long-term changes in determinants of GPs' benzodiazepines prescribing: a pretest-posttest study with self-report assessments.个体化电子学习可长期改变全科医生开具苯二氮䓬类药物的决定因素:一项使用自我报告评估的预测试后研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Dec;37(4):418-425. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1663591. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
3
Exploring how medical students learn with the help of a digital presentation: a qualitative study.探讨医学生如何借助数字演示文稿进行学习:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1569-z.
4
Team-based learning improves knowledge and retention in an emergency medicine clerkship.基于团队的学习可提高急诊医学实习中的知识水平和记忆效果。
Int J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb 11;12(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12245-019-0222-2.
5
Implementation of modified team-based learning within a problem based learning medical curriculum: a focus group study.在基于问题的医学课程中实施改良的团队学习:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1172-8.
6
A Moodle-based blended learning solution for physiology education in Montenegro: a case study.黑山共和国基于Moodle的生理学教育混合学习解决方案:一项案例研究。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2018 Mar 1;42(1):111-117. doi: 10.1152/advan.00155.2017.
7
Team based learning in nursing and midwifery higher education; a systematic review of the evidence for change.护理与助产高等教育中的团队式学习;对变革证据的系统评价
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jan;60:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
8
Comparison of lecture and team-based learning in medical ethics education.讲座法与小组为基础的学习在医学伦理学教育中的比较。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 May;26(3):903-913. doi: 10.1177/0969733017731916. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
9
A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education.系统评价翻转课堂在医学教育中的有效性。
Med Educ. 2017 Jun;51(6):585-597. doi: 10.1111/medu.13272.
10
Monitoring and regulation of learning in medical education: the need for predictive cues.医学教育中的学习监测与调控:预测线索的必要性。
Med Educ. 2017 Jun;51(6):575-584. doi: 10.1111/medu.13267. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

基于团队的和混合学习感知的改进:沙特国王大学医学生队列研究。

Modified team-based and blended learning perception: a cohort study among medical students at King Saud University.

机构信息

Medical Informatics and E-Learning Unit, Medical Education Department, Health Informatics and Promotion Research Chair, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

UM eHealth Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 8;21(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02639-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-021-02639-2
PMID:33832479
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8034081/
Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Medical schools have evolved toward competency-based education and active learner-centered strategies. Medical informatics course was introduced in 2011 in the 3rd year at the College of Medicine (CoM), King Saud University (KSU), to enhance future medical graduates with technological and information competencies. Modified team-based learning and blended learning were emphasized using face-to-face lectures, various e-learning technologies, workshop and seminars. The current study's main objective was to assess students' perceptions towards blended and modified team-based learning at the CoM in KSU.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to medical students in three consecutive years: 2017-2019. The survey contains items regarding student perception of various types of blended learning techniques applied in the course. The survey was administered using i-Clicker; an interactive device that enables students to answer survey questions. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the perception of students on these blended learning dimensions investigated.

RESULTS

Seven-hundred and one student responded to the questionnaire (male; 69.5%, female 30.5%). Out of which, 59.1% of students found team interactions positively supported discussions and asked questions freely, and 48.1% expressed that working in groups facilitated their learning process. However, 56.0% of students chose face-to-face lectures as the most preferred class activities followed by discussion 23.8%. More than 78% of participants agree that online quizzes are good experience and enjoyable. Grade center where students can check for marks and attendance also received high perception (66.3%).

CONCLUSION

Introducing modified team-based and blended-learning are considered challenging, and therefore, investigating their perceptions can provide useful insights into how these methods could be used more effectively. The blended-learning technique is highly essential in teaching medical informatics to overcome challenges faced due to a large number of students and the need for various exposures to reach the course's learning goals. Moreover, it is noticed that students were engaged in face-to-face and online activities, furthermore, modified team-based learning reported facilitating learning and asking questions without embarrassment.

摘要

背景与目的

医学院校已经朝着以能力为基础的教育和以主动学习者为中心的策略发展。2011 年,沙特国王大学(KSU)医学院(CoM)在第 3 年开设了医学信息学课程,旨在增强未来医学毕业生的技术和信息能力。本课程强调使用面对面讲座、各种电子学习技术、讲习班和研讨会来实施改良团队学习和混合学习。本研究的主要目的是评估 KSU CoM 学生对混合式和改良团队学习的看法。

方法

我们在连续三年(2017-2019 年)向医学生发放了一份调查问卷。该问卷包含了学生对课程中应用的各种混合学习技术的看法。使用 i-Clicker 来管理问卷,这是一种可以使学生回答问卷问题的互动设备。我们使用描述性统计来检验学生对这些混合学习维度的看法。

结果

701 名学生对问卷做出了回应(男生占 69.5%,女生占 30.5%)。其中,59.1%的学生认为团队互动积极支持讨论并自由提问,48.1%的学生表示小组合作促进了他们的学习过程。然而,56.0%的学生选择面对面讲座作为他们最喜爱的课堂活动,其次是讨论(占 23.8%)。超过 78%的参与者认为在线测验是很好的体验,令人愉快。学生可以在成绩中心查看成绩和出勤情况,该系统也获得了很高的评价(占 66.3%)。

结论

引入改良团队学习和混合学习被认为是具有挑战性的,因此,调查他们的看法可以为如何更有效地使用这些方法提供有用的见解。混合学习技术在教授医学信息学方面非常重要,可以克服由于学生人数众多和需要各种机会来实现课程学习目标而面临的挑战。此外,我们注意到学生参与了面对面和在线活动,并且改良团队学习报告促进了学习和提问,而不会让人感到尴尬。