School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, P.R. China.
School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, P.R. China.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1029. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05963-5.
Significant challenges are arising around how to best enable peer communities, broaden educational reach, and innovate in pedagogy. While digital education can address these challenges, digital elements alone do not guarantee effective learning. This study reports a blended learning approach integrating online and face-to-face components, guided by the Student Approaches to Learning framework.
This study was carried out investigating learning in first and second year medical students over two academic years, 2019/20 and 2020/21. We evaluated: (1) comparison of students engaged with blended learning and traditional learning; and (2) student learning engaged with blended learning approach over a two-year preclinical curriculum. A revised two-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) evaluated students' surface/deep learning before and after an academic year. Learning experience (LE) questionnaire was administered over the domains of learning engagement, and outcomes of learning approach. In-depth interviews were carried out to understand the context of students' responses to the R-SPQ-2F and LE questionnaires.
The R-SPQ-2F analysis indicated first year students maintained deep learning but second year students became neutral across the academic year, regardless of learning approach, with workload contributing to this outcome. R-SPQ-2F sub-scales showed that students engaged with blended learning maintained an intrinsic interest to learning, as compared to traditional learning which led to surface learning motives. The LE questionnaire showed students engaged with blended learning had deeper subject interest, and more positive perceptions of workload, feedback, and effectively developed skills and knowledge. However, peer interactions from blended learning were significantly lacking. In-depth interviews revealed that the flexibility and multi-modality of blended learning enabled learning, but the best use of these features require teacher support. Online interactions could be cultivated through intentional institutional efforts.
This study highlights the importance of designing blended learning that leverages technology-enabled flexibility while prioritising collaborative, learner-centred spaces for deep engagement and knowledge construction.
如何更好地发挥同行社区的作用、扩大教育覆盖面并创新教学方法,正面临着巨大的挑战。虽然数字教育可以解决这些挑战,但仅仅依靠数字元素并不能保证有效的学习。本研究报告了一种融合在线和面对面教学的混合学习方法,该方法以学生学习方法框架为指导。
本研究在两个学年(2019/20 年和 2020/21 年)中对一年级和二年级医学生的学习情况进行了调查。我们评估了:(1)混合学习和传统学习的学生参与度比较;(2)在两年的临床前课程中,混合学习方法对学生学习的影响。修订后的双因素学习过程问卷(R-SPQ-2F)评估了学生在一学年前后的表层/深层学习情况。学习体验(LE)问卷评估了学习参与度和学习方法的学习成果等领域。通过深入访谈,了解学生对 R-SPQ-2F 和 LE 问卷的反应背景。
R-SPQ-2F 分析表明,一年级学生保持了深度学习,但无论学习方式如何,二年级学生在整个学年中都变得中立,工作量是造成这种结果的原因。R-SPQ-2F 子量表显示,与传统学习导致表面学习动机相比,参与混合学习的学生保持了对学习的内在兴趣。LE 问卷显示,参与混合学习的学生对学科更有兴趣,对工作量、反馈和有效发展技能和知识的评价更积极。然而,混合学习中的同伴互动明显不足。深入访谈揭示了混合学习的灵活性和多模态性能够促进学习,但最好地利用这些功能需要教师的支持。可以通过机构的有意识努力来培养在线互动。
本研究强调了设计混合学习的重要性,这种学习方法需要充分利用技术支持的灵活性,同时优先考虑协作、以学生为中心的空间,以实现深度参与和知识构建。