• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会认知对道德判断的影响。

The Effects of Social Perception on Moral Judgment.

作者信息

Jin Wen Ying, Peng Ming

机构信息

School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.

Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 23;11:557216. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.557216. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.557216
PMID:33833702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8023274/
Abstract

When people express a moral judgment, others make inferences about their personality, such as whether they are warm or competent. People may use this interpersonal process to present themselves in a way that is socially acceptable in the current circumstances. Across four studies, we investigated this hypothesis in Chinese culture and showed that college student participants tended to associate others' deontological moral judgments with warmth and utilitarian moral judgments with competence (Study 1, = 21.1, SD = 2.45; Study 2, = 20.53, SD = 1.87). In addition, participants made more deontological judgments after preparing to be interviewed for a job requiring them to be in a warm social role, and more utilitarian judgments after preparing for a job requiring them to be in a competent social role (Study 3, = 19.5, SD = 1.63). This effect held true in moral dilemmas involving different degrees of hypothetical personal involvement, and appeared to be mediated by the perception of others' expectations (Study 4, = 19.92, SD = 1.97). The results suggest an important role for social cognition as an influence on moral judgments in Chinese culture.

摘要

当人们表达道德判断时,其他人会对他们的性格做出推断,比如他们是热情还是有能力。人们可能会利用这种人际过程以一种在当前情况下社会可接受的方式展现自己。在四项研究中,我们在中国文化背景下对这一假设进行了调查,结果表明大学生参与者倾向于将他人的道义论道德判断与热情联系起来,将功利主义道德判断与能力联系起来(研究1,M = 21.1,标准差 = 2.45;研究2,M = 20.53,标准差 = 1.87)。此外,参与者在准备接受一份要求他们扮演热情社会角色的工作面试后,会做出更多的道义论判断;而在准备一份要求他们扮演有能力社会角色的工作后,会做出更多的功利主义判断(研究3,M = 19.5,标准差 = 1.63)。这种效应在涉及不同程度假设个人参与的道德困境中都成立,并且似乎是由对他人期望的感知所介导的(研究4,M = 19.92,标准差 = 1.97)。研究结果表明,社会认知在中国文化中对道德判断有着重要影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ce/8023274/05773f18ff0c/fpsyg-11-557216-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ce/8023274/bb32695d8235/fpsyg-11-557216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ce/8023274/3178782e2f70/fpsyg-11-557216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ce/8023274/a7165393c857/fpsyg-11-557216-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ce/8023274/10ccc625d639/fpsyg-11-557216-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ce/8023274/ccdd68f3bb04/fpsyg-11-557216-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ce/8023274/05773f18ff0c/fpsyg-11-557216-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ce/8023274/bb32695d8235/fpsyg-11-557216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ce/8023274/3178782e2f70/fpsyg-11-557216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ce/8023274/a7165393c857/fpsyg-11-557216-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ce/8023274/10ccc625d639/fpsyg-11-557216-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ce/8023274/ccdd68f3bb04/fpsyg-11-557216-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ce/8023274/05773f18ff0c/fpsyg-11-557216-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effects of Social Perception on Moral Judgment.社会认知对道德判断的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 23;11:557216. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.557216. eCollection 2020.
2
At the heart of morality lies neuro-visceral integration: lower cardiac vagal tone predicts utilitarian moral judgment.道德的核心在于神经-内脏整合:较低的心脏迷走神经张力预示着功利主义道德判断。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Oct;11(10):1588-96. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw077. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
3
Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.道德决策中的道义论和功利主义倾向:一种过程分离方法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Feb;104(2):216-35. doi: 10.1037/a0031021. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
4
What makes moral dilemma judgments "utilitarian" or "deontological"?是什么使得道德困境判断成为“功利主义的”或“义务论的”?
Soc Neurosci. 2017 Dec;12(6):626-632. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1248787. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
5
Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.牺牲功利主义判断确实反映了对更大利益的关注:通过过程分离和哲学家的判断进行澄清。
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:241-265. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
6
Do People Believe That They Are More Deontological Than Others?人们是否认为自己比别人更有道德?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Aug;45(8):1308-1320. doi: 10.1177/0146167218823040. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
7
Beyond Affective Influences on Deontological Moral Judgment: The Role of Motivations for Prevention in the Moral Condemnation of Harm.超越情感对道义论道德判断的影响:预防动机在伤害道德谴责中的作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Nov;42(11):1522-1537. doi: 10.1177/0146167216665094. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
'Utilitarian' judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good.在牺牲性道德困境中做出的“功利主义”判断并不反映对更大利益的公正关切。
Cognition. 2015 Jan;134:193-209. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
9
Do affective episodes modulate moral judgment in individuals with bipolar disorder?情感发作是否会调节双相情感障碍个体的道德判断?
J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:289-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.067. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
10
When You Think of and Identify Yourself as a Nurse, You Will Become More Deontological and Less Utilitarian.当你将自己视为护士并认同这一身份时,你将变得更加注重道德,而不是功利主义。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 31;21(6):712. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060712.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Social Relationships Influence Moral Judgment? A Cross-Cultural Examination.社会关系会影响道德判断吗?一项跨文化研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 12;15(8):1097. doi: 10.3390/bs15081097.
2
When empathy leads to aggression: The effects of empathy on punitive attitudes towards aggressors.当同理心引发攻击行为:同理心对惩罚侵犯者态度的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e12907. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12907.

本文引用的文献

1
Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.从直观的道德判断中推断可信度。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jun;145(6):772-87. doi: 10.1037/xge0000165. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
2
Moral judgment as information processing: an integrative review.作为信息处理的道德判断:一项综合综述。
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 30;6:1637. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01637. eCollection 2015.
3
Morality: An Evolutionary Account.道德:一种进化解释。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 May;3(3):149-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00072.x.
4
A person-centered approach to moral judgment.一种以人为本的道德判断方法。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;10(1):72-81. doi: 10.1177/1745691614556679.
5
Core values versus common sense: consequentialist views appear less rooted in morality.核心价值观与常识:结果主义观点似乎不太植根于道德。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;40(11):1529-42. doi: 10.1177/0146167214551154. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
6
Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation.道德品质在人际知觉和评价中占主导地位。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jan;106(1):148-68. doi: 10.1037/a0034726. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
7
Warmth and competence in your face! Visual encoding of stereotype content.面容上的温暖与能力!刻板印象内容的视觉编码。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 28;4:386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00386. Print 2013.
8
When it takes a bad person to do the right thing.当一个坏人做了正确的事。
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):326-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
9
Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality.心理感知是道德的本质。
Psychol Inq. 2012 Apr;23(2):101-124. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387. Epub 2012 May 31.
10
Benefiting from misfortune: when harmless actions are judged to be morally blameworthy.因祸得福:当无害的行为被判定为道德上应受谴责时。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jan;38(1):52-62. doi: 10.1177/0146167211430232.